Pain, policy, and the opioid dilemma in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review of access, regulation, and health governance from 1990 to 2024.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Simon Nyarko, Roger A Atinga, Julius Caesar Mahama
{"title":"Pain, policy, and the opioid dilemma in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review of access, regulation, and health governance from 1990 to 2024.","authors":"Simon Nyarko, Roger A Atinga, Julius Caesar Mahama","doi":"10.1093/heapol/czag035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) faces a dual opioid dilemma: widespread undertreatment of moderate to severe pain due to limited access to essential opioid analgesics, alongside increasing concern about misuse and diversion in selected contexts. Opioids are clinically indicated for severe cancer-related pain, advanced chronic illness, major trauma, surgery, and end-of-life care; yet, regional consumption remains disproportionately low relative to documented disease burden, indicating systemic under-provision rather than low need. This systematic review synthesizes evidence on opioid policy, regulation, access, and governance in SSA to examine how legal frameworks, institutional arrangements, political dynamics, and data systems shape medical availability. Following PRISMA and SWiM guidance, we reviewed peer-reviewed and gray literature addressing national drug control laws, regulatory implementation, procurement and supply systems, prescribing authority, and surveillance capacity; 33 studies met inclusion criteria. Across settings, restrictive or ambiguously interpreted legislation, multi-layered administrative controls, fragmented mandates across health and enforcement institutions, weak forecasting and distribution systems, concentrated prescribing authority, professional risk aversion, and chronic data gaps were consistently associated with constrained access. Concurrently, rising political and media attention to non-medical use, particularly of tramadol, has reinforced enforcement-oriented narratives that may further limit reform space. Persistent deficiencies in routine consumption data and unmet need assessment contribute to conservative import quotas and regulatory inertia. Addressing this imbalance requires proportionate, sequenced reform that strengthens data and forecasting systems, clarifies and aligns legal mandates with public health objectives, invests in workforce capacity and supply chains, and embeds safeguards against diversion while correcting avoidable under-treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":12926,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and planning","volume":" ","pages":"898-912"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13187638/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health policy and planning","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czag035","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) faces a dual opioid dilemma: widespread undertreatment of moderate to severe pain due to limited access to essential opioid analgesics, alongside increasing concern about misuse and diversion in selected contexts. Opioids are clinically indicated for severe cancer-related pain, advanced chronic illness, major trauma, surgery, and end-of-life care; yet, regional consumption remains disproportionately low relative to documented disease burden, indicating systemic under-provision rather than low need. This systematic review synthesizes evidence on opioid policy, regulation, access, and governance in SSA to examine how legal frameworks, institutional arrangements, political dynamics, and data systems shape medical availability. Following PRISMA and SWiM guidance, we reviewed peer-reviewed and gray literature addressing national drug control laws, regulatory implementation, procurement and supply systems, prescribing authority, and surveillance capacity; 33 studies met inclusion criteria. Across settings, restrictive or ambiguously interpreted legislation, multi-layered administrative controls, fragmented mandates across health and enforcement institutions, weak forecasting and distribution systems, concentrated prescribing authority, professional risk aversion, and chronic data gaps were consistently associated with constrained access. Concurrently, rising political and media attention to non-medical use, particularly of tramadol, has reinforced enforcement-oriented narratives that may further limit reform space. Persistent deficiencies in routine consumption data and unmet need assessment contribute to conservative import quotas and regulatory inertia. Addressing this imbalance requires proportionate, sequenced reform that strengthens data and forecasting systems, clarifies and aligns legal mandates with public health objectives, invests in workforce capacity and supply chains, and embeds safeguards against diversion while correcting avoidable under-treatment.

撒哈拉以南非洲的疼痛、政策和阿片类药物困境:1990年至2024年对获取、监管和卫生治理的系统回顾。
撒哈拉以南非洲(SSA)面临着阿片类药物的双重困境:由于获得基本阿片类镇痛药的机会有限,中度至重度疼痛普遍治疗不足,同时在某些情况下对滥用和转移的担忧日益增加。阿片类药物在临床上用于严重的癌症相关疼痛、晚期慢性疾病、重大创伤、手术和临终关怀,但相对于文献记载的疾病负担,区域消费量仍然低得不成比例,表明系统性供应不足,而不是需求低。本系统综述综合了SSA中阿片类药物政策、监管、获取和治理方面的证据,以研究法律框架、制度安排、政治动态和数据系统如何影响医疗可用性。根据PRISMA和SWiM的指导,我们审查了同行评议的文献和灰色文献,涉及国家药物管制法律、监管实施、采购和供应系统、开处方权限和监测能力;33项研究符合纳入标准。在各种情况下,限制性或解释含糊的立法、多层次的行政控制、卫生和执法机构之间分散的任务、薄弱的预测和分配系统、集中的开处方权力、专业风险规避以及长期的数据差距始终与获取受限有关。与此同时,政治和媒体对曲马多的非医疗用途,特别是曲马多的非医疗用途的日益关注,加强了以执法为导向的叙述,这可能进一步限制改革空间。日常消费数据的持续不足和未满足的需求评估导致进口配额保守和监管惰性。要解决这一不平衡问题,需要有比例、有顺序的改革,加强数据和预测系统,澄清法律授权并使其与公共卫生目标保持一致,投资于劳动力能力和供应链,并在纠正可避免的治疗不足的同时,落实防范转用的保障措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health policy and planning
Health policy and planning 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
98
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Health Policy and Planning publishes health policy and systems research focusing on low- and middle-income countries. Our journal provides an international forum for publishing original and high-quality research that addresses questions pertinent to policy-makers, public health researchers and practitioners. Health Policy and Planning is published 10 times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书