Promoting Safe Opioid Disposal: Experimental Evidence on Behavioral Messaging With Financial Incentives

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Health economics Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-16 DOI:10.1002/hec.70085
Mattie Toma, Russell Burnett, Pompa Debroy, Eugen Dimant, Jean Liu, Elana Safran, Uzaib Saya, Bill Schultz
{"title":"Promoting Safe Opioid Disposal: Experimental Evidence on Behavioral Messaging With Financial Incentives","authors":"Mattie Toma,&nbsp;Russell Burnett,&nbsp;Pompa Debroy,&nbsp;Eugen Dimant,&nbsp;Jean Liu,&nbsp;Elana Safran,&nbsp;Uzaib Saya,&nbsp;Bill Schultz","doi":"10.1002/hec.70085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Some patients prescribed opioid pills fail to properly dispose of their unused pills, posing a risk for others. We report results from a pre-registered field experiment testing whether behaviorally informed reminder cards increase participation in a financial incentive program for returning unused opioid pills among U.S. Veterans. The cards incorporate principles from behavioral economics, including timely reminders, implementation intention prompts, and loss framing. Relative to a cash incentive alone, the reminder cards increase both the likelihood that patients return unused pills (the extensive margin) and the number of pills returned (the intensive margin). The intervention also improves cost-effectiveness, reducing both the cost per pill returned and the cost per participant who returns pills. These findings show that low-cost behavioral messaging can meaningfully enhance the effectiveness of existing financial incentive programs for safe opioid disposal.</p>","PeriodicalId":12847,"journal":{"name":"Health economics","volume":"35 7","pages":"1023-1032"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hec.70085","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hec.70085","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Some patients prescribed opioid pills fail to properly dispose of their unused pills, posing a risk for others. We report results from a pre-registered field experiment testing whether behaviorally informed reminder cards increase participation in a financial incentive program for returning unused opioid pills among U.S. Veterans. The cards incorporate principles from behavioral economics, including timely reminders, implementation intention prompts, and loss framing. Relative to a cash incentive alone, the reminder cards increase both the likelihood that patients return unused pills (the extensive margin) and the number of pills returned (the intensive margin). The intervention also improves cost-effectiveness, reducing both the cost per pill returned and the cost per participant who returns pills. These findings show that low-cost behavioral messaging can meaningfully enhance the effectiveness of existing financial incentive programs for safe opioid disposal.

Abstract Image

促进阿片类药物的安全处置:金融激励下行为信息传递的实验证据。
一些服用阿片类药物的患者没有妥善处理他们未使用的药片,给其他人带来了风险。我们报告了一项预先注册的现场实验的结果,该实验测试了行为通知提醒卡是否增加了美国退伍军人归还未使用阿片类药物的财务激励计划的参与。这些卡片结合了行为经济学的原则,包括及时提醒、执行意图提示和损失框架。相对于单独的现金激励,提醒卡增加了患者退回未使用的药片的可能性(广泛边际)和退回的药片数量(密集边际)。干预措施还提高了成本效益,降低了每个退回药片的成本和每个退回药片的参与者的成本。这些发现表明,低成本的行为信息传递可以有效地提高现有的阿片类药物安全处置财政激励计划的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health economics
Health economics 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.80%
发文量
177
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: This Journal publishes articles on all aspects of health economics: theoretical contributions, empirical studies and analyses of health policy from the economic perspective. Its scope includes the determinants of health and its definition and valuation, as well as the demand for and supply of health care; planning and market mechanisms; micro-economic evaluation of individual procedures and treatments; and evaluation of the performance of health care systems. Contributions should typically be original and innovative. As a rule, the Journal does not include routine applications of cost-effectiveness analysis, discrete choice experiments and costing analyses. Editorials are regular features, these should be concise and topical. Occasionally commissioned reviews are published and special issues bring together contributions on a single topic. Health Economics Letters facilitate rapid exchange of views on topical issues. Contributions related to problems in both developed and developing countries are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书