Therapeutic and Side Effects of Enoxaparin over Heparin on Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients in Bali.

IF 2.4 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Rini Noviyani, I Gusti Ayu Widha Paramistya Devi, I Made Putra Swi Antara, Agata Widtama, Sagung Chandra Yowani
{"title":"Therapeutic and Side Effects of Enoxaparin over Heparin on Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients in Bali.","authors":"Rini Noviyani, I Gusti Ayu Widha Paramistya Devi, I Made Putra Swi Antara, Agata Widtama, Sagung Chandra Yowani","doi":"10.2174/011573403X414877251124225616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Anticoagulant therapies such as enoxaparin and heparin are commonly used to reduce thrombotic events, but their comparative efficacy and safety profiles remain to be fully established. This study aimed to compare the therapeutic effects and side effects of enoxaparin versus heparin in patients with ACS treated at hospitals in Bali. No randomization or blinding was performed in this observational study due to its retrospective design. This study was conducted as a cross-sectional observational study by reviewing medical records of patients diagnosed with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) treated at Prof. Dr. I.G.N.G. Ngoerah Hospital and RSUD Tabanan from January 2021 to December 2023, Bali, Indonesia.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A retrospective cross-sectional observational study was conducted by reviewing medical records of ACS patients treated at Prof. Dr. I.G.N.G. Ngoerah Hospital and RSUD Tabanan, Bali, Indonesia, from January 2021 to December 2023. No randomization or blinding was performed due to the observational design. Sample size was calculated using the Lemeshow formula, with a minimum of 66 patients required. The primary outcomes were recurrence of myocardial infarction (MI) and mortality, while bleeding events were secondary outcomes. Logistic regression was employed to adjust for confounders, including age, sex, hypertension, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and ACS subtype, Bali, Indonesia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 73 patients (60 receiving enoxaparin, 13 receiving heparin), MI recurrence rates were 6.7% and 0%, mortality rates were 3.3% and 30.8%, and bleeding incidence was 5% and 7.7%, respectively. Mortality was significantly lower in the enoxaparin group (p = 0.008). Adjusted logistic regression revealed that hypertension significantly increased bleeding risk (adjusted OR = 29.4; 95% CI: 1.02-844.0; p = 0.049), while other factors showed no significant association.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The results suggest that enoxaparin is associated with lower mortality compared to heparin without significant differences in MI recurrence or bleeding events. The strong association between hypertension and bleeding highlights the need for careful management of hypertensive ACS patients. However, wide confidence intervals and small sample size warrant cautious interpretation, and further large-scale prospective studies are needed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Enoxaparin appears to be more effective in reducing mortality than heparin in ACS patients, with hypertension identified as a significant risk factor for bleeding. These findings support the preferential use of enoxaparin in this population, pending validation from larger studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":10832,"journal":{"name":"Current Cardiology Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13656227/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Cardiology Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/011573403X414877251124225616","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Anticoagulant therapies such as enoxaparin and heparin are commonly used to reduce thrombotic events, but their comparative efficacy and safety profiles remain to be fully established. This study aimed to compare the therapeutic effects and side effects of enoxaparin versus heparin in patients with ACS treated at hospitals in Bali. No randomization or blinding was performed in this observational study due to its retrospective design. This study was conducted as a cross-sectional observational study by reviewing medical records of patients diagnosed with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) treated at Prof. Dr. I.G.N.G. Ngoerah Hospital and RSUD Tabanan from January 2021 to December 2023, Bali, Indonesia.

Methodology: A retrospective cross-sectional observational study was conducted by reviewing medical records of ACS patients treated at Prof. Dr. I.G.N.G. Ngoerah Hospital and RSUD Tabanan, Bali, Indonesia, from January 2021 to December 2023. No randomization or blinding was performed due to the observational design. Sample size was calculated using the Lemeshow formula, with a minimum of 66 patients required. The primary outcomes were recurrence of myocardial infarction (MI) and mortality, while bleeding events were secondary outcomes. Logistic regression was employed to adjust for confounders, including age, sex, hypertension, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and ACS subtype, Bali, Indonesia.

Results: Among 73 patients (60 receiving enoxaparin, 13 receiving heparin), MI recurrence rates were 6.7% and 0%, mortality rates were 3.3% and 30.8%, and bleeding incidence was 5% and 7.7%, respectively. Mortality was significantly lower in the enoxaparin group (p = 0.008). Adjusted logistic regression revealed that hypertension significantly increased bleeding risk (adjusted OR = 29.4; 95% CI: 1.02-844.0; p = 0.049), while other factors showed no significant association.

Discussion: The results suggest that enoxaparin is associated with lower mortality compared to heparin without significant differences in MI recurrence or bleeding events. The strong association between hypertension and bleeding highlights the need for careful management of hypertensive ACS patients. However, wide confidence intervals and small sample size warrant cautious interpretation, and further large-scale prospective studies are needed.

Conclusion: Enoxaparin appears to be more effective in reducing mortality than heparin in ACS patients, with hypertension identified as a significant risk factor for bleeding. These findings support the preferential use of enoxaparin in this population, pending validation from larger studies.

依诺肝素优于肝素治疗巴厘急性冠脉综合征的疗效及不良反应。
简介:急性冠脉综合征(ACS)是世界范围内发病率和死亡率的主要原因。抗凝治疗如依诺肝素和肝素通常用于减少血栓事件,但其相对疗效和安全性仍有待完全确定。本研究旨在比较依诺肝素与肝素在巴厘岛医院治疗的ACS患者的治疗效果和副作用。由于采用回顾性设计,本观察性研究未采用随机化或盲法。本研究是一项横断面观察性研究,通过回顾2021年1月至2023年12月在印度尼西亚巴厘岛的I.G.N.G. Ngoerah博士医院和RSUD Tabanan治疗的急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者的医疗记录进行的。方法:通过回顾2021年1月至2023年12月在印度尼西亚巴厘岛的I.G.N.G. Ngoerah教授博士医院和RSUD塔巴南医院治疗的ACS患者的医疗记录,进行了一项回顾性横断面观察研究。由于观察性设计,没有进行随机化或盲化。使用Lemeshow公式计算样本量,至少需要66名患者。主要结局是心肌梗死(MI)复发和死亡率,而出血事件是次要结局。采用Logistic回归校正混杂因素,包括年龄、性别、高血压、糖尿病、慢性肾脏疾病和ACS亚型(印度尼西亚巴厘岛)。结果:73例患者(接受依诺肝素治疗60例,接受肝素治疗13例),心肌梗死复发率分别为6.7%和0%,死亡率分别为3.3%和30.8%,出血发生率分别为5%和7.7%。依诺肝素组死亡率显著降低(p = 0.008)。经校正logistic回归分析,高血压显著增加出血风险(校正OR = 29.4; 95% CI: 1.02 ~ 844.0; p = 0.049),其他因素无显著相关性。讨论:结果表明,与肝素相比,依诺肝素与较低的死亡率相关,但在心肌梗死复发或出血事件方面没有显著差异。高血压和出血之间的密切联系强调了对高血压ACS患者进行谨慎管理的必要性。然而,较宽的置信区间和较小的样本量需要谨慎的解释,并且需要进一步的大规模前瞻性研究。结论:依诺肝素在降低ACS患者死亡率方面似乎比肝素更有效,高血压被认为是出血的重要危险因素。这些发现支持在这一人群中优先使用依诺肝素,有待更大规模研究的验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Cardiology Reviews
Current Cardiology Reviews CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.50%
发文量
117
期刊介绍: Current Cardiology Reviews publishes frontier reviews of high quality on all the latest advances on the practical and clinical approach to the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. All relevant areas are covered by the journal including arrhythmia, congestive heart failure, cardiomyopathy, congenital heart disease, drugs, methodology, pacing, and preventive cardiology. The journal is essential reading for all researchers and clinicians in cardiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书