Advancing Smell Disorder Diagnostics: A Comparative Review of Portable Test Kits and Self-Reported Tools.

IF 1.9
Jayasurya Ramesh, Lakshmi Kanakaraj, Mohammad Badrud Duza
{"title":"Advancing Smell Disorder Diagnostics: A Comparative Review of Portable Test Kits and Self-Reported Tools.","authors":"Jayasurya Ramesh, Lakshmi Kanakaraj, Mohammad Badrud Duza","doi":"10.2174/0115672050427159251203090611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><p> Olfactory Dysfunction (OD) is a prevalent yet underdiagnosed sensory disorder with profound implications for quality of life and for the early detection of neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson's and Alzheimer's. Beyond its sensory role, OD has emerged as an early, noninvasive biomarker of neurodegenerative pathology, often preceding measurable cognitive decline in Alzheimer's Disease (AD) and Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). Quantitative smell loss correlates with pathological changes in the olfactory bulb and entorhinal cortex, highlighting its diagnostic potential for early screening and longitudinal monitoring. </p><p> Traditional diagnostic tools, though validated, often require specialized personnel, laboratory infrastructure, and extended testing time, limiting accessibility. This review critically examines recent innovations in the detection of olfactory dysfunction, focusing on portable, user-friendly smell test kits and their comparative performance with self-reported tools such as the Mini Olfactory Questionnaire (Self-MOQ) and 4-CAST. We synthesize evidence on diagnostic reliability, usability, and cultural adaptability, evaluating how these methods align with emerging needs in Alzheimer's and dementia research. </p><p> Portable kits such as PT-Smell and SSomix demonstrate high diagnostic precision and cultural adaptability, while self-administered and self-report tools enable scalable deployment in memory clinics and community screening programs. Within Alzheimer's research, these approaches present practical solutions for early identification of sensory biomarkers linked to cognitive decline. </p><p> To optimize diagnostic integration, a two-step framework is proposed: first-line screening with self-administered tools such as Self-MOQ or 4-CAST, followed by confirmatory psychophysical testing with portable kits such as PT-Smell or SSomix. This tiered model supports early AD and MCI detection, enhances accessibility, and promotes digital health integration for widespread olfactory monitoring. </p>.</p>","PeriodicalId":94309,"journal":{"name":"Current Alzheimer research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Alzheimer research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115672050427159251203090611","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Olfactory Dysfunction (OD) is a prevalent yet underdiagnosed sensory disorder with profound implications for quality of life and for the early detection of neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson's and Alzheimer's. Beyond its sensory role, OD has emerged as an early, noninvasive biomarker of neurodegenerative pathology, often preceding measurable cognitive decline in Alzheimer's Disease (AD) and Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). Quantitative smell loss correlates with pathological changes in the olfactory bulb and entorhinal cortex, highlighting its diagnostic potential for early screening and longitudinal monitoring.

Traditional diagnostic tools, though validated, often require specialized personnel, laboratory infrastructure, and extended testing time, limiting accessibility. This review critically examines recent innovations in the detection of olfactory dysfunction, focusing on portable, user-friendly smell test kits and their comparative performance with self-reported tools such as the Mini Olfactory Questionnaire (Self-MOQ) and 4-CAST. We synthesize evidence on diagnostic reliability, usability, and cultural adaptability, evaluating how these methods align with emerging needs in Alzheimer's and dementia research.

Portable kits such as PT-Smell and SSomix demonstrate high diagnostic precision and cultural adaptability, while self-administered and self-report tools enable scalable deployment in memory clinics and community screening programs. Within Alzheimer's research, these approaches present practical solutions for early identification of sensory biomarkers linked to cognitive decline.

To optimize diagnostic integration, a two-step framework is proposed: first-line screening with self-administered tools such as Self-MOQ or 4-CAST, followed by confirmatory psychophysical testing with portable kits such as PT-Smell or SSomix. This tiered model supports early AD and MCI detection, enhances accessibility, and promotes digital health integration for widespread olfactory monitoring.

.

推进嗅觉障碍诊断:便携式测试试剂盒和自我报告工具的比较回顾。
嗅觉功能障碍(OD)是一种普遍但未被诊断的感觉障碍,对生活质量和早期发现神经退行性疾病(如帕金森病和阿尔茨海默病)有着深远的影响。除了它的感觉作用,OD已经成为神经退行性病理的早期、非侵入性生物标志物,通常在阿尔茨海默病(AD)和轻度认知障碍(MCI)的可测量的认知衰退之前出现。定量嗅觉丧失与嗅球和嗅内皮层的病理变化相关,突出了其早期筛查和纵向监测的诊断潜力。传统的诊断工具虽然经过验证,但通常需要专门的人员、实验室基础设施和延长的测试时间,限制了可及性。本文综述了最近在嗅觉功能障碍检测方面的创新,重点关注便携式,用户友好的气味测试试剂盒及其与自我报告工具(如迷你嗅觉问卷(Self-MOQ)和4-CAST)的比较性能。我们综合了诊断可靠性、可用性和文化适应性方面的证据,评估了这些方法如何与阿尔茨海默病和痴呆症研究的新需求相一致。便携式工具包,如PT-Smell和SSomix,具有较高的诊断精度和文化适应性,而自我管理和自我报告工具可以在记忆诊所和社区筛查项目中进行可扩展部署。在阿尔茨海默氏症的研究中,这些方法为早期识别与认知能力下降有关的感觉生物标志物提供了实用的解决方案。为了优化诊断整合,提出了一个两步框架:使用自我管理工具(如Self-MOQ或4-CAST)进行一线筛查,然后使用便携式试剂盒(如PT-Smell或SSomix)进行确认性心理物理测试。这种分层模型支持早期AD和MCI检测,增强了可及性,并促进了广泛嗅觉监测的数字健康集成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书