Performance Verification and Establishment of Reference Intervals for Dendritic Cells, γδT Cells, and Follicular Helper T Cells Using Flow Cytometry.

IF 3.2
Mei Liu, Tian-Ling Yang, Xin Cheng, Si-Hua Yu, Ya-Jing Fu, Pan Wang, Yong-Jun Jiang, Zi-Ning Zhang, Hong Shang
{"title":"Performance Verification and Establishment of Reference Intervals for Dendritic Cells, γδT Cells, and Follicular Helper T Cells Using Flow Cytometry.","authors":"Mei Liu, Tian-Ling Yang, Xin Cheng, Si-Hua Yu, Ya-Jing Fu, Pan Wang, Yong-Jun Jiang, Zi-Ning Zhang, Hong Shang","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2025-0371-OA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>Dendritic cells (DCs), gamma-delta T (γδT) cells, and T follicular helper (Tfh) cells are key players in immune responses and clinical surveillance. While flow cytometry (FCM) provides precise quantification of these subsets with their subpopulations, its clinical application remains limited, partly due to lack of standardized performance verification and reference intervals.</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To facilitate the standardization and clinical application of peripheral DCs, γδT cells, and Tfh cells with their subpopulations, based on FCM.</p><p><strong>Design.—: </strong>Peripheral whole blood from healthy individuals was collected to measure the frequency of DCs, γδT cells, and Tfh cells with their subpopulations via FCM. Sample stability, reportable range, intra-assay/interassay precision, and linearity were evaluated from best practice documents, followed by establishing reference intervals.</p><p><strong>Results.—: </strong>For sample stability, samples were stable up to 24 hours post collection at 4°C for DCs with their subpopulations; samples were stable up to 96 hours at both 4°C and room temperature for γδT cells with their subpopulations; samples showed instability after 24 hours at both 4°C and room temperature for Tfh cells with their subpopulations. For the reportable range, the minimum cell numbers of upper gate for target cells that could meet the detection requirements of DCs, γδT cells, and Tfh cells with their subpopulations were 5000, 250, and 1000. Both intra-assay/interassay precision and linearity fulfilled the acceptance criteria. Furthermore, we established the reference intervals for DCs, γδT cells, and Tfh cells with their subpopulations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>We conducted systematic performance verification and established reference intervals for DCs, γδT cells, and Tfh cells with their subpopulations via FCM, promoting the standardization and clinical application of these assays.</p>","PeriodicalId":93883,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e141-e148"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2025-0371-OA","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context.—: Dendritic cells (DCs), gamma-delta T (γδT) cells, and T follicular helper (Tfh) cells are key players in immune responses and clinical surveillance. While flow cytometry (FCM) provides precise quantification of these subsets with their subpopulations, its clinical application remains limited, partly due to lack of standardized performance verification and reference intervals.

Objective.—: To facilitate the standardization and clinical application of peripheral DCs, γδT cells, and Tfh cells with their subpopulations, based on FCM.

Design.—: Peripheral whole blood from healthy individuals was collected to measure the frequency of DCs, γδT cells, and Tfh cells with their subpopulations via FCM. Sample stability, reportable range, intra-assay/interassay precision, and linearity were evaluated from best practice documents, followed by establishing reference intervals.

Results.—: For sample stability, samples were stable up to 24 hours post collection at 4°C for DCs with their subpopulations; samples were stable up to 96 hours at both 4°C and room temperature for γδT cells with their subpopulations; samples showed instability after 24 hours at both 4°C and room temperature for Tfh cells with their subpopulations. For the reportable range, the minimum cell numbers of upper gate for target cells that could meet the detection requirements of DCs, γδT cells, and Tfh cells with their subpopulations were 5000, 250, and 1000. Both intra-assay/interassay precision and linearity fulfilled the acceptance criteria. Furthermore, we established the reference intervals for DCs, γδT cells, and Tfh cells with their subpopulations.

Conclusions.—: We conducted systematic performance verification and established reference intervals for DCs, γδT cells, and Tfh cells with their subpopulations via FCM, promoting the standardization and clinical application of these assays.

流式细胞术检测树突状细胞、γδT细胞和滤泡辅助T细胞的性能验证和参考区间的建立
上下文。-:树突状细胞(dc)、γδT细胞(γδT)和T滤泡辅助细胞(Tfh)在免疫应答和临床监测中起着关键作用。虽然流式细胞术(FCM)提供了这些亚群及其亚群的精确定量,但其临床应用仍然有限,部分原因是缺乏标准化的性能验证和参考区间。-:基于FCM.Design,促进外周血dc、γδT细胞、Tfh细胞及其亚群的标准化和临床应用。-:采集健康人外周血,通过流式细胞术测定dc、γδT细胞和Tfh细胞及其亚群的频率。根据最佳实践文件评估样品稳定性、可报告范围、测定内/测定间精密度和线性,然后建立参考区间。-:对于样品稳定性,dc及其亚群在4°C下采集后24小时内样品是稳定的;γδT细胞及其亚群在4℃和室温下均可稳定96小时;Tfh细胞及其亚群在4°C和室温下放置24小时后均表现出不稳定性。在可报告范围内,能够满足dc、γδT细胞和Tfh细胞及其亚群检测要求的靶细胞上门限最小细胞数分别为5000、250和1000。测定内/测定间的精密度和线性均符合验收标准。此外,我们建立了dc、γδT细胞和Tfh细胞及其亚群的参考区间。-:通过流式细胞术对dc、γδT细胞和Tfh细胞及其亚群进行了系统的性能验证,建立了参考区间,促进了这些检测的标准化和临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书