Cognitive and behavioral involvement in spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy (SBMA): a systematic review.

IF 2.8
Giulia De Luca, Edoardo Nicolò Aiello, Arianna Moreschi, Beatrice Curti, Sonia Marcato, Federica Paredi, Federico Verde, Vincenzo Silani, Nicola Ticozzi, Barbara Poletti, Gianni Sorarù
{"title":"Cognitive and behavioral involvement in spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy (SBMA): a systematic review.","authors":"Giulia De Luca, Edoardo Nicolò Aiello, Arianna Moreschi, Beatrice Curti, Sonia Marcato, Federica Paredi, Federico Verde, Vincenzo Silani, Nicola Ticozzi, Barbara Poletti, Gianni Sorarù","doi":"10.1080/21678421.2025.2608228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed at reviewing currently available evidence on cognitive and behavioral involvement in spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy (SBMA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This review was performed in accordance with the 2020 PRISMA guidelines. We included case reports/series and group studies reporting data on the neuropsychological features of SBMA patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 123 unique records identified, 11 studies were included (<i>N</i> = 5 case reports/series; <i>N</i> = 6 group studies), comprising 151 SBMA patients. Among case reports and series, 6 out of 10 patients were reported to exhibit some degree of neuropsychological involvement, with two being diagnosed with a dementia condition resembling the characteristics of behavioral variant-frontotemporal dementia. Three of the 6 case-control studies found no cognitive differences between SBMA patients and healthy controls. Cognitive deficits reported in group studies mostly involved the executive, attentional, memory and visuo-spatial/-constructive domains.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The available evidence on cognitive and behavioral involvement in SBMA is scarce and conflicting. However, it is conceivable that at least some patients may exhibit dysexecutive-type changes, possibly reflecting a frontal system involvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":72184,"journal":{"name":"Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration","volume":" ","pages":"652-670"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degeneration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21678421.2025.2608228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed at reviewing currently available evidence on cognitive and behavioral involvement in spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy (SBMA).

Methods: This review was performed in accordance with the 2020 PRISMA guidelines. We included case reports/series and group studies reporting data on the neuropsychological features of SBMA patients.

Results: Out of 123 unique records identified, 11 studies were included (N = 5 case reports/series; N = 6 group studies), comprising 151 SBMA patients. Among case reports and series, 6 out of 10 patients were reported to exhibit some degree of neuropsychological involvement, with two being diagnosed with a dementia condition resembling the characteristics of behavioral variant-frontotemporal dementia. Three of the 6 case-control studies found no cognitive differences between SBMA patients and healthy controls. Cognitive deficits reported in group studies mostly involved the executive, attentional, memory and visuo-spatial/-constructive domains.

Conclusions: The available evidence on cognitive and behavioral involvement in SBMA is scarce and conflicting. However, it is conceivable that at least some patients may exhibit dysexecutive-type changes, possibly reflecting a frontal system involvement.

认知和行为参与脊髓和球性肌萎缩(SBMA):一个系统的回顾。
目的:本研究旨在回顾目前关于脊髓和球性肌萎缩(SBMA)的认知和行为参与的证据。方法:本综述按照2020年PRISMA指南进行。我们纳入了报告SBMA患者神经心理特征的病例报告/系列研究和小组研究。结果:在鉴定的123份独特记录中,纳入了11项研究(N = 5例病例报告/系列;N = 6组研究),包括151例SBMA患者。在病例报告和系列研究中,10名患者中有6名表现出一定程度的神经心理学参与,其中2名被诊断患有类似行为变异-额颞叶痴呆特征的痴呆症。6个病例对照研究中有3个发现SBMA患者和健康对照组之间没有认知差异。在小组研究中报告的认知缺陷主要涉及执行、注意力、记忆和视觉空间/建构领域。结论:关于SBMA的认知和行为参与的现有证据很少且相互矛盾。然而,可以想象的是,至少一些患者可能表现出执行障碍类型的变化,可能反映了额叶系统的参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书