{"title":"Potential Harm of the Use of the Word “Benign” in Gynecologic Care","authors":"Mary G. Hoberg, Lacey W. Heinsberg","doi":"10.1016/j.jogn.2026.02.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>“Benign gynecologic conditions” is an umbrella term widely used to describe prevalent conditions such as endometriosis, adenomyosis, uterine fibroids, and genitourinary syndrome of menopause in clinical guidelines, research, reviews, and health policy. However, this term is nonspecific, clinically misleading, and potentially harmful. Although these conditions are not cancerous, they can be chronic, painful, and life-disrupting, which renders the term inappropriate because it does not reflect women’s experiences. In this article, we trace the historical origins of the term “benign” and explore how its continued use may contribute to delays in diagnosis, minimization of symptoms, and disinvestment in women’s health research and education. Replacing the term benign with more precise and respectful phrases, such as “chronic gynecologic conditions,” is an essential part of efforts to improve patient-centered care, restore trust, and advance equity in women’s health.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54903,"journal":{"name":"Jognn-Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing","volume":"55 5","pages":"Pages 501-509"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jognn-Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0884217526000377","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
“Benign gynecologic conditions” is an umbrella term widely used to describe prevalent conditions such as endometriosis, adenomyosis, uterine fibroids, and genitourinary syndrome of menopause in clinical guidelines, research, reviews, and health policy. However, this term is nonspecific, clinically misleading, and potentially harmful. Although these conditions are not cancerous, they can be chronic, painful, and life-disrupting, which renders the term inappropriate because it does not reflect women’s experiences. In this article, we trace the historical origins of the term “benign” and explore how its continued use may contribute to delays in diagnosis, minimization of symptoms, and disinvestment in women’s health research and education. Replacing the term benign with more precise and respectful phrases, such as “chronic gynecologic conditions,” is an essential part of efforts to improve patient-centered care, restore trust, and advance equity in women’s health.
期刊介绍:
JOGNN is a premier resource for health care professionals committed to clinical scholarship that advances the health care of women and newborns. With a focus on nursing practice, JOGNN addresses the latest research, practice issues, policies, opinions, and trends in the care of women, childbearing families, and newborns.
This peer-reviewed scientific and technical journal is highly respected for groundbreaking articles on important - and sometimes controversial - issues. Articles published in JOGNN emphasize research evidence and clinical practice, building both science and clinical applications. JOGNN seeks clinical, policy and research manuscripts on the evidence supporting current best practice as well as developing or emerging practice trends. A balance of quantitative and qualitative research with an emphasis on biobehavioral outcome studies and intervention trials is desired. Manuscripts are welcomed on all subjects focused on the care of women, childbearing families, and newborns.