Charlotte Copas, Abigail D Astridge, Olivia Hannon, Beatriz Duarte Martins, Rhiannon Rowse, Christine Padgett, Gershon Spitz, Terence J O'Brien, Jennifer Makovec Knight, Silke Meyer, Zhibin Chen, Michael J O'Sullivan, Stuart J McDonald, Sandy R Shultz, Georgia F Symons
{"title":"Predictors of Concussion-Like Symptoms in Women Recruited from the Community with a History of Intimate Partner Violence.","authors":"Charlotte Copas, Abigail D Astridge, Olivia Hannon, Beatriz Duarte Martins, Rhiannon Rowse, Christine Padgett, Gershon Spitz, Terence J O'Brien, Jennifer Makovec Knight, Silke Meyer, Zhibin Chen, Michael J O'Sullivan, Stuart J McDonald, Sandy R Shultz, Georgia F Symons","doi":"10.1177/08977151261425216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intimate partner violence (IPV) affects one in three women worldwide. Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI, i.e., concussion) is a frequent yet overlooked and under-researched consequence of IPV. Persistent postconcussion symptoms (PPCS) include a constellation of debilitating physical, emotional, and cognitive symptoms affecting approximately 15-30% of mTBI patients. Risk factors of PPCS include female sex, a history of mTBI, and mental health conditions, all of which are prominent in IPV contexts. Therefore, victim-survivors may be at an increased risk for PPCS; however, the prevalence and possible contributing factors, such as nonfatal strangulation (NFS) and head trauma (HT), remain largely unknown in this population. This study assessed 153 community-recruited women, including 96 IPV victim-survivors (>6 months postexposure to IPV) and 57 non-IPV controls. Participants completed structured interviews assessing medical history, concussion-like symptoms (Rivermead Postconcussion Symptom Questionnaire; RPQ), IPV (Composite Abuse Scale (Revised)-Short Form; CASR-SF), brain injury (Brain Injury Screening Questionnaire-7 + IPV module), and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms (The PTSD Checklist for The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders-5; PCL-5). First, regression analyses were used to examine how individual risk factors (i.e., IPV exposure, mTBI, HT, NFS events, depression diagnosis, and probable PTSD) are related to concussion-like symptoms. Second, participants were grouped based on IPV and mTBI status: (1) healthy control (HC) (<i>n</i> = 38), (2) mTBI with no IPV; non-IPV-mTBI (<i>n</i> = 19), (3) IPV without mTBI; IPV (<i>n</i> = 29), and (4) IPV with mTBI; IPV-mTBI (<i>n</i> = 67) to compare RPQ severity across groups and symptom profiles (i.e., total, somatic, emotional, and cognitive). As an exploratory analysis, we applied International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) postconcussion syndrome (PCS) symptom criteria to gauge how concussion-like symptom profiles in this cohort aligned with ICD-10 threshold levels. Overall, regression analysis revealed that IPV-mTBI, IPV-HT, and IPV-NFS were significantly associated with greater concussion-like symptoms, regardless of the number of times each event occurred, as were a history of depression diagnosis and probable PTSD. Non-IPV-related mTBI and HT were only associated at higher exposure (>5 and >10, respectively). Group comparisons revealed that the IPV-mTBI group exhibited greater RPQ severity across total, somatic, emotional, and cognitive symptom profiles compared to the mTBI and HC groups. Interestingly, the IPV and IPV-mTBI groups did not differ significantly, highlighting the nonspecific nature of concussion-like symptoms in this population. When applying the exploratory ICD-10 PCS symptom thresholds, significant predictors from the primary analysis were consistently associated, and the IPV-mTBI group showed a markedly higher proportion (74.6%) meeting these criteria compared to the mTBI (10.5%) and HC groups (23.7%). These findings highlight the under-recognized burden of concussion-like symptoms in IPV victim-survivors, highlighting the need for targeted services (e.g., linking IPV services and concussion clinics) to identify, manage, and treat an area currently lacking support for this high-risk population.</p>","PeriodicalId":16512,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurotrauma","volume":" ","pages":"1387-1399"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurotrauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08977151261425216","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Intimate partner violence (IPV) affects one in three women worldwide. Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI, i.e., concussion) is a frequent yet overlooked and under-researched consequence of IPV. Persistent postconcussion symptoms (PPCS) include a constellation of debilitating physical, emotional, and cognitive symptoms affecting approximately 15-30% of mTBI patients. Risk factors of PPCS include female sex, a history of mTBI, and mental health conditions, all of which are prominent in IPV contexts. Therefore, victim-survivors may be at an increased risk for PPCS; however, the prevalence and possible contributing factors, such as nonfatal strangulation (NFS) and head trauma (HT), remain largely unknown in this population. This study assessed 153 community-recruited women, including 96 IPV victim-survivors (>6 months postexposure to IPV) and 57 non-IPV controls. Participants completed structured interviews assessing medical history, concussion-like symptoms (Rivermead Postconcussion Symptom Questionnaire; RPQ), IPV (Composite Abuse Scale (Revised)-Short Form; CASR-SF), brain injury (Brain Injury Screening Questionnaire-7 + IPV module), and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms (The PTSD Checklist for The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders-5; PCL-5). First, regression analyses were used to examine how individual risk factors (i.e., IPV exposure, mTBI, HT, NFS events, depression diagnosis, and probable PTSD) are related to concussion-like symptoms. Second, participants were grouped based on IPV and mTBI status: (1) healthy control (HC) (n = 38), (2) mTBI with no IPV; non-IPV-mTBI (n = 19), (3) IPV without mTBI; IPV (n = 29), and (4) IPV with mTBI; IPV-mTBI (n = 67) to compare RPQ severity across groups and symptom profiles (i.e., total, somatic, emotional, and cognitive). As an exploratory analysis, we applied International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) postconcussion syndrome (PCS) symptom criteria to gauge how concussion-like symptom profiles in this cohort aligned with ICD-10 threshold levels. Overall, regression analysis revealed that IPV-mTBI, IPV-HT, and IPV-NFS were significantly associated with greater concussion-like symptoms, regardless of the number of times each event occurred, as were a history of depression diagnosis and probable PTSD. Non-IPV-related mTBI and HT were only associated at higher exposure (>5 and >10, respectively). Group comparisons revealed that the IPV-mTBI group exhibited greater RPQ severity across total, somatic, emotional, and cognitive symptom profiles compared to the mTBI and HC groups. Interestingly, the IPV and IPV-mTBI groups did not differ significantly, highlighting the nonspecific nature of concussion-like symptoms in this population. When applying the exploratory ICD-10 PCS symptom thresholds, significant predictors from the primary analysis were consistently associated, and the IPV-mTBI group showed a markedly higher proportion (74.6%) meeting these criteria compared to the mTBI (10.5%) and HC groups (23.7%). These findings highlight the under-recognized burden of concussion-like symptoms in IPV victim-survivors, highlighting the need for targeted services (e.g., linking IPV services and concussion clinics) to identify, manage, and treat an area currently lacking support for this high-risk population.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Neurotrauma is the flagship, peer-reviewed publication for reporting on the latest advances in both the clinical and laboratory investigation of traumatic brain and spinal cord injury. The Journal focuses on the basic pathobiology of injury to the central nervous system, while considering preclinical and clinical trials targeted at improving both the early management and long-term care and recovery of traumatically injured patients. This is the essential journal publishing cutting-edge basic and translational research in traumatically injured human and animal studies, with emphasis on neurodegenerative disease research linked to CNS trauma.