Unlocking digital health: inequalities in the adoption of a patient portal.

IF 6.2 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Richard David Barker, Refik Gökmen, Daisy Naylor, James T Teo
{"title":"Unlocking digital health: inequalities in the adoption of a patient portal.","authors":"Richard David Barker, Refik Gökmen, Daisy Naylor, James T Teo","doi":"10.1136/bmjhci-2025-101587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Digital health apps and patient portals are proposed as part of the drive from 'analogue to digital' care for the National Health Service (NHS) 10-Year Plan. Without mitigation strategies, digital inequalities could arise as a result, and more evidence is needed to understand how to mitigate this.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As part of an equality impact assessment, a retrospective cross-sectional analysis was conducted examining patient portal activation among patients invited to outpatient appointments at two large south-east London Hospital Trusts between 1 May and 1 November 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 503 688 patients invited to attend outpatient clinics during the study period, 52.7% had activated the patient portal. Availability of email contact details was the strongest determinant of onboarding likelihood (OR 10.86). Multivariate logistic regression models showed that the following groups were less likely to activate the patient portal: men (OR 0.84), individuals at the extremes of age (71-80 or 11-20 years), those of mixed or undefined ethnicity (OR 0.58), those of black ethnicity (OR 0.62) and those with the highest degree of socioeconomic deprivation (Index of Multiple Deprivation group 1; OR 0.68).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This large-scale roll-out of a digital health portal provides empirical evidence of factors that drive digital inequalities for patients of two major London NHS Trusts. The observed disparities across demographic and socioeconomic dimensions and simple reliable digital contact mechanisms highlight the risk that digital healthcare initiatives may inadvertently produce new types of inequalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":9050,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Health & Care Informatics","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12993344/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Health & Care Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2025-101587","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Digital health apps and patient portals are proposed as part of the drive from 'analogue to digital' care for the National Health Service (NHS) 10-Year Plan. Without mitigation strategies, digital inequalities could arise as a result, and more evidence is needed to understand how to mitigate this.

Methods: As part of an equality impact assessment, a retrospective cross-sectional analysis was conducted examining patient portal activation among patients invited to outpatient appointments at two large south-east London Hospital Trusts between 1 May and 1 November 2024.

Results: Of the 503 688 patients invited to attend outpatient clinics during the study period, 52.7% had activated the patient portal. Availability of email contact details was the strongest determinant of onboarding likelihood (OR 10.86). Multivariate logistic regression models showed that the following groups were less likely to activate the patient portal: men (OR 0.84), individuals at the extremes of age (71-80 or 11-20 years), those of mixed or undefined ethnicity (OR 0.58), those of black ethnicity (OR 0.62) and those with the highest degree of socioeconomic deprivation (Index of Multiple Deprivation group 1; OR 0.68).

Conclusion: This large-scale roll-out of a digital health portal provides empirical evidence of factors that drive digital inequalities for patients of two major London NHS Trusts. The observed disparities across demographic and socioeconomic dimensions and simple reliable digital contact mechanisms highlight the risk that digital healthcare initiatives may inadvertently produce new types of inequalities.

解锁数字卫生:采用患者门户网站中的不平等现象。
目的:数字健康应用程序和患者门户网站被提议作为国家卫生服务(NHS) 10年计划从“模拟到数字”护理的一部分。如果没有缓解战略,就可能产生数字不平等,需要更多证据来了解如何缓解这种不平等。方法:作为平等影响评估的一部分,回顾性横断面分析对2024年5月1日至11月1日在伦敦东南部两家大型医院信托基金接受门诊预约的患者进行了患者门户激活检查。结果:在研究期间,503688名门诊患者中,52.7%的患者激活了患者门户。电子邮件联系方式的可用性是入职可能性的最强决定因素(OR 10.86)。多因素logistic回归模型显示,以下人群激活患者门脉的可能性较小:男性(OR 0.84)、极端年龄(71-80岁或11-20岁)、混合或未定义种族(OR 0.58)、黑人(OR 0.62)和社会经济剥夺程度最高的人群(多重剥夺指数组1;OR 0.68)。结论:这一大规模推出的数字健康门户提供了实证证据的因素,推动数字不平等的两个主要伦敦NHS信托患者。观察到的人口和社会经济方面的差异以及简单可靠的数字联系机制突出了数字医疗保健举措可能在无意中产生新型不平等的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
4.90%
发文量
40
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书