Proverbs as other-than-human actants in corporate social responsibility communication: A ventriloquial analysis of corporate-community dialogues

IF 4.6 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Mai Chi Vu, Hyemi Shin
{"title":"Proverbs as other-than-human actants in corporate social responsibility communication: A ventriloquial analysis of corporate-community dialogues","authors":"Mai Chi Vu, Hyemi Shin","doi":"10.1177/00187267261425549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How do proverbs play a role in the evolution of corporate-community communication about social responsibility? We show that these everyday sayings can act as powerful, other-than-human actants in corporate social responsibility (CSR) dialogues. Drawing on 32 interviews with CSR managers in Vietnam, supported by ethnographic notes and observations from 8 corporate–community presentation sessions, we trace how proverbs enter conversations and redirect the flow of interaction. Using a ventriloquial lens, we identify three mechanisms—authoring, re-authoring, and counter-authoring—through which proverbs speak on behalf of participants, challenge corporate narratives, and reopen space for community voice. Our findings reveal how proverbs become resources through which community members reclaim authority, rework the meaning of CSR, and negotiate more equal communicative ground with corporations. By foregrounding how these cultural resources participate in interaction, our study encourages communication constitutes organization scholarship to take seriously the organizing role of material and other-than-human actants. We argue that attending to proverbs not only enriches our understanding of communication in the Global South but also unsettles dominant assumptions about who, and what, gets to participate in organizational life.","PeriodicalId":48433,"journal":{"name":"Human Relations","volume":"92 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Relations","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267261425549","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How do proverbs play a role in the evolution of corporate-community communication about social responsibility? We show that these everyday sayings can act as powerful, other-than-human actants in corporate social responsibility (CSR) dialogues. Drawing on 32 interviews with CSR managers in Vietnam, supported by ethnographic notes and observations from 8 corporate–community presentation sessions, we trace how proverbs enter conversations and redirect the flow of interaction. Using a ventriloquial lens, we identify three mechanisms—authoring, re-authoring, and counter-authoring—through which proverbs speak on behalf of participants, challenge corporate narratives, and reopen space for community voice. Our findings reveal how proverbs become resources through which community members reclaim authority, rework the meaning of CSR, and negotiate more equal communicative ground with corporations. By foregrounding how these cultural resources participate in interaction, our study encourages communication constitutes organization scholarship to take seriously the organizing role of material and other-than-human actants. We argue that attending to proverbs not only enriches our understanding of communication in the Global South but also unsettles dominant assumptions about who, and what, gets to participate in organizational life.
谚语在企业社会责任沟通中的非人类行为:企业-社区对话的腹语分析
谚语在企业与社区社会责任沟通的演变过程中扮演了怎样的角色?我们表明,这些日常用语可以在企业社会责任(CSR)对话中发挥强大的、超越人类的作用。通过对32位越南企业社会责任经理的采访,并结合8次企业社区演讲的民族志笔记和观察,我们追踪了谚语如何进入对话并重新引导互动流程。通过腹语镜头,我们确定了三种机制——创作、再创作和反创作——通过这些机制,谚语代表参与者说话,挑战企业叙事,并重新打开社区声音的空间。我们的研究结果揭示了谚语如何成为社区成员重新获得权威、重新定义企业社会责任的意义以及与企业谈判更平等的沟通基础的资源。通过强调这些文化资源如何参与互动,我们的研究鼓励沟通构成组织学术认真对待物质和非人类行动者的组织作用。我们认为,关注谚语不仅丰富了我们对南半球沟通的理解,而且动摇了关于谁、什么可以参与组织生活的主流假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Relations
Human Relations Multiple-
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
7.00%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: Human Relations is an international peer reviewed journal, which publishes the highest quality original research to advance our understanding of social relationships at and around work through theoretical development and empirical investigation. Scope Human Relations seeks high quality research papers that extend our knowledge of social relationships at work and organizational forms, practices and processes that affect the nature, structure and conditions of work and work organizations. Human Relations welcomes manuscripts that seek to cross disciplinary boundaries in order to develop new perspectives and insights into social relationships and relationships between people and organizations. Human Relations encourages strong empirical contributions that develop and extend theory as well as more conceptual papers that integrate, critique and expand existing theory. Human Relations welcomes critical reviews and essays: - Critical reviews advance a field through new theory, new methods, a novel synthesis of extant evidence, or a combination of two or three of these elements. Reviews that identify new research questions and that make links between management and organizations and the wider social sciences are particularly welcome. Surveys or overviews of a field are unlikely to meet these criteria. - Critical essays address contemporary scholarly issues and debates within the journal''s scope. They are more controversial than conventional papers or reviews, and can be shorter. They argue a point of view, but must meet standards of academic rigour. Anyone with an idea for a critical essay is particularly encouraged to discuss it at an early stage with the Editor-in-Chief. Human Relations encourages research that relates social theory to social practice and translates knowledge about human relations into prospects for social action and policy-making that aims to improve working lives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书