{"title":"Proverbs as other-than-human actants in corporate social responsibility communication: A ventriloquial analysis of corporate-community dialogues","authors":"Mai Chi Vu, Hyemi Shin","doi":"10.1177/00187267261425549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How do proverbs play a role in the evolution of corporate-community communication about social responsibility? We show that these everyday sayings can act as powerful, other-than-human actants in corporate social responsibility (CSR) dialogues. Drawing on 32 interviews with CSR managers in Vietnam, supported by ethnographic notes and observations from 8 corporate–community presentation sessions, we trace how proverbs enter conversations and redirect the flow of interaction. Using a ventriloquial lens, we identify three mechanisms—authoring, re-authoring, and counter-authoring—through which proverbs speak on behalf of participants, challenge corporate narratives, and reopen space for community voice. Our findings reveal how proverbs become resources through which community members reclaim authority, rework the meaning of CSR, and negotiate more equal communicative ground with corporations. By foregrounding how these cultural resources participate in interaction, our study encourages communication constitutes organization scholarship to take seriously the organizing role of material and other-than-human actants. We argue that attending to proverbs not only enriches our understanding of communication in the Global South but also unsettles dominant assumptions about who, and what, gets to participate in organizational life.","PeriodicalId":48433,"journal":{"name":"Human Relations","volume":"92 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Relations","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267261425549","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
How do proverbs play a role in the evolution of corporate-community communication about social responsibility? We show that these everyday sayings can act as powerful, other-than-human actants in corporate social responsibility (CSR) dialogues. Drawing on 32 interviews with CSR managers in Vietnam, supported by ethnographic notes and observations from 8 corporate–community presentation sessions, we trace how proverbs enter conversations and redirect the flow of interaction. Using a ventriloquial lens, we identify three mechanisms—authoring, re-authoring, and counter-authoring—through which proverbs speak on behalf of participants, challenge corporate narratives, and reopen space for community voice. Our findings reveal how proverbs become resources through which community members reclaim authority, rework the meaning of CSR, and negotiate more equal communicative ground with corporations. By foregrounding how these cultural resources participate in interaction, our study encourages communication constitutes organization scholarship to take seriously the organizing role of material and other-than-human actants. We argue that attending to proverbs not only enriches our understanding of communication in the Global South but also unsettles dominant assumptions about who, and what, gets to participate in organizational life.
期刊介绍:
Human Relations is an international peer reviewed journal, which publishes the highest quality original research to advance our understanding of social relationships at and around work through theoretical development and empirical investigation. Scope Human Relations seeks high quality research papers that extend our knowledge of social relationships at work and organizational forms, practices and processes that affect the nature, structure and conditions of work and work organizations. Human Relations welcomes manuscripts that seek to cross disciplinary boundaries in order to develop new perspectives and insights into social relationships and relationships between people and organizations. Human Relations encourages strong empirical contributions that develop and extend theory as well as more conceptual papers that integrate, critique and expand existing theory. Human Relations welcomes critical reviews and essays: - Critical reviews advance a field through new theory, new methods, a novel synthesis of extant evidence, or a combination of two or three of these elements. Reviews that identify new research questions and that make links between management and organizations and the wider social sciences are particularly welcome. Surveys or overviews of a field are unlikely to meet these criteria. - Critical essays address contemporary scholarly issues and debates within the journal''s scope. They are more controversial than conventional papers or reviews, and can be shorter. They argue a point of view, but must meet standards of academic rigour. Anyone with an idea for a critical essay is particularly encouraged to discuss it at an early stage with the Editor-in-Chief. Human Relations encourages research that relates social theory to social practice and translates knowledge about human relations into prospects for social action and policy-making that aims to improve working lives.