Strategic code-switching in IB negotiations: How confessional institutions shape negotiation strategy in Lebanon

IF 4.2 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Journal of International Management Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-13 DOI:10.1016/j.intman.2026.101346
Bachar Moughayt
{"title":"Strategic code-switching in IB negotiations: How confessional institutions shape negotiation strategy in Lebanon","authors":"Bachar Moughayt","doi":"10.1016/j.intman.2026.101346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Dominant culture-centric models in international business (IB) negotiation research often overlook the influence of intra-national religious diversity and its interplay with specific institutional contexts. This study extends these models by examining how religious values and a powerful, faith-based institutional system jointly shape negotiation strategy. Drawing on Neo-Institutional Theory (NIT), this paper analyzes qualitative data from 40 in-depth interviews with senior Lebanese managers from diverse religious backgrounds (Muslim, Christian, and Druze) with extensive IB negotiation experience. The study reveals that Lebanese negotiators navigate a tension between two competing institutional logics: a “logic of universal religious ethics” (derived from faith values like honesty and fairness), which fosters a preference for integrative strategies, and a “logic of sectarian pragmatism” (derived from Lebanon's confessional system), which encourages more distributive tactics. Managers engage in “strategic code-switching,” selectively deploying these logics based on the negotiation context (intra-Lebanon vs. cross-border), the dyadic pairing (e.g., intra-faith vs. faith-secular), and the deal structure (e.g., international joint ventures (IJV) vs. sales). This dynamic is most salient in the critical pre-negotiation phase of partner selection and trust-building. This study advances IB negotiation theory by providing a granular, institutionally-embedded conceptual model of negotiator behavior that moves beyond monolithic views of culture. It contributes to NIT by empirically illustrating how actors strategically navigate conflicting logics at the micro-level and enriches the study of religion in IB by specifying the mechanisms through which faith shapes strategy. Practically, the findings highlight the need for managers to develop deep institutional acumen to succeed in complex, multi-faith markets.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47937,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Management","volume":"32 2","pages":"Article 101346"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075425326000207","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dominant culture-centric models in international business (IB) negotiation research often overlook the influence of intra-national religious diversity and its interplay with specific institutional contexts. This study extends these models by examining how religious values and a powerful, faith-based institutional system jointly shape negotiation strategy. Drawing on Neo-Institutional Theory (NIT), this paper analyzes qualitative data from 40 in-depth interviews with senior Lebanese managers from diverse religious backgrounds (Muslim, Christian, and Druze) with extensive IB negotiation experience. The study reveals that Lebanese negotiators navigate a tension between two competing institutional logics: a “logic of universal religious ethics” (derived from faith values like honesty and fairness), which fosters a preference for integrative strategies, and a “logic of sectarian pragmatism” (derived from Lebanon's confessional system), which encourages more distributive tactics. Managers engage in “strategic code-switching,” selectively deploying these logics based on the negotiation context (intra-Lebanon vs. cross-border), the dyadic pairing (e.g., intra-faith vs. faith-secular), and the deal structure (e.g., international joint ventures (IJV) vs. sales). This dynamic is most salient in the critical pre-negotiation phase of partner selection and trust-building. This study advances IB negotiation theory by providing a granular, institutionally-embedded conceptual model of negotiator behavior that moves beyond monolithic views of culture. It contributes to NIT by empirically illustrating how actors strategically navigate conflicting logics at the micro-level and enriches the study of religion in IB by specifying the mechanisms through which faith shapes strategy. Practically, the findings highlight the need for managers to develop deep institutional acumen to succeed in complex, multi-faith markets.
IB谈判中的战略语码转换:黎巴嫩的忏悔机构如何塑造谈判策略
在国际商务谈判研究中,以文化为中心的主流模式往往忽视了国家内部宗教多样性的影响及其与特定制度背景的相互作用。本研究通过考察宗教价值观和强大的、基于信仰的制度体系如何共同塑造谈判策略来扩展这些模型。利用新制度理论(NIT),本文分析了40位具有丰富IB谈判经验的不同宗教背景(穆斯林、基督教和德鲁兹教派)的黎巴嫩高级管理人员的深度访谈所得的定性数据。这项研究表明,黎巴嫩谈判者在两种相互竞争的制度逻辑之间游走:一种是“普世宗教伦理逻辑”(源自诚实和公平等信仰价值观),它促进了对综合战略的偏好;另一种是“宗派实用主义逻辑”(源自黎巴嫩的忏悔体系),它鼓励更多的分配策略。管理人员从事“战略代码转换”,根据谈判背景(黎巴嫩内部vs跨境)、二元配对(例如,信仰内部vs信仰-世俗)和交易结构(例如,国际合资企业(IJV) vs销售)有选择地部署这些逻辑。这种动态在选择合作伙伴和建立信任的关键谈判前阶段最为突出。本研究提供了一个细化的、制度嵌入的谈判者行为概念模型,超越了单一的文化观点,从而推进了IB谈判理论。它通过实证说明行为者如何在微观层面上战略性地驾驭冲突逻辑,并通过具体说明信仰塑造策略的机制,丰富了IB中的宗教研究,从而为NIT做出了贡献。实际上,研究结果突显出,要在复杂、多元信仰的市场中取得成功,基金经理需要培养深厚的机构敏锐度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
9.80%
发文量
67
审稿时长
81 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of International Management is devoted to advancing an understanding of issues in the management of global enterprises, global management theory, and practice; and providing theoretical and managerial implications useful for the further development of research. It is designed to serve an audience of academic researchers and educators, as well as business professionals, by publishing both theoretical and empirical research relating to international management and strategy issues. JIM publishes theoretical and empirical research addressing international business strategy, comparative and cross-cultural management, risk management, organizational behavior, and human resource management, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书