Government-firm vs. government-business connections and outward foreign direct investment in China

IF 4.2 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Journal of International Management Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-21 DOI:10.1016/j.intman.2026.101328
Jinhui Luo, Qiao Wei, Xuantong Yi
{"title":"Government-firm vs. government-business connections and outward foreign direct investment in China","authors":"Jinhui Luo,&nbsp;Qiao Wei,&nbsp;Xuantong Yi","doi":"10.1016/j.intman.2026.101328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We replicate the study by <span><span>Du and Luo (2016)</span></span> and reconsider the effect of political connections on outward foreign direct investment (OFDI) in recent China. <span><span>Du and Luo (2016)</span></span> suggest that the traditional mode of political connections (i.e., government-firm connections) could create resource and legitimacy advantages for the connected firms in the local market and so prevent these connected firms from engaging in OFDI overseas. Whereas, the new mode of political connections (i.e., government-business connections) emerged in China recently, and has changed the processes of resource allocation and legitimacy granting to a more equal and transparent way, thereby reshaping the connected firms' advantages as well as their OFDI decisions. Specifically, the new government-business connections would diminish the resource and legitimacy advantages of the connected firms in home country while strengthen their resource and legitimacy advantages in host countries, thus driving OFDI. Based on the two mechanisms, this driving force is more salient in non-labor-intensive firms and non-state-owned enterprises. We replicate the study by <span><span>Du and Luo (2016)</span></span> with (1) sample from the same dataset while in more recent years (2016–2022), (2) a comparison between the impact of two modes of political connections and (3) an illustration for the resource and legitimacy mechanisms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47937,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Management","volume":"32 2","pages":"Article 101328"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075425326000025","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We replicate the study by Du and Luo (2016) and reconsider the effect of political connections on outward foreign direct investment (OFDI) in recent China. Du and Luo (2016) suggest that the traditional mode of political connections (i.e., government-firm connections) could create resource and legitimacy advantages for the connected firms in the local market and so prevent these connected firms from engaging in OFDI overseas. Whereas, the new mode of political connections (i.e., government-business connections) emerged in China recently, and has changed the processes of resource allocation and legitimacy granting to a more equal and transparent way, thereby reshaping the connected firms' advantages as well as their OFDI decisions. Specifically, the new government-business connections would diminish the resource and legitimacy advantages of the connected firms in home country while strengthen their resource and legitimacy advantages in host countries, thus driving OFDI. Based on the two mechanisms, this driving force is more salient in non-labor-intensive firms and non-state-owned enterprises. We replicate the study by Du and Luo (2016) with (1) sample from the same dataset while in more recent years (2016–2022), (2) a comparison between the impact of two modes of political connections and (3) an illustration for the resource and legitimacy mechanisms.
政企关系与政商关系与中国的对外直接投资
我们复制了杜和罗(2016)的研究,并重新考虑了政治关系对近期中国对外直接投资(OFDI)的影响。Du和Luo(2016)认为,传统的政治关系模式(即政企关系)可以为关联企业在当地市场创造资源和合法性优势,从而阻止这些关联企业从事海外OFDI。然而,中国最近出现了一种新的政治关系模式(即政商关系),并将资源配置和合法性授予的过程改变为一种更加平等和透明的方式,从而重塑了关联企业的优势及其对外直接投资决策。具体而言,新的政商联系将削弱被联系企业在母国的资源和合法性优势,而增强其在东道国的资源和合法性优势,从而推动对外直接投资。基于这两种机制,这种驱动力在非劳动密集型企业和非国有企业中更为突出。我们复制了杜和罗(2016)的研究:(1)来自同一数据集的样本,而在最近几年(2016 - 2022),(2)比较了两种政治关系模式的影响,(3)说明了资源和合法性机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
9.80%
发文量
67
审稿时长
81 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of International Management is devoted to advancing an understanding of issues in the management of global enterprises, global management theory, and practice; and providing theoretical and managerial implications useful for the further development of research. It is designed to serve an audience of academic researchers and educators, as well as business professionals, by publishing both theoretical and empirical research relating to international management and strategy issues. JIM publishes theoretical and empirical research addressing international business strategy, comparative and cross-cultural management, risk management, organizational behavior, and human resource management, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书