A systematic review of replication studies in international management: What has been done so far, and what needs to be done in the future?

IF 4.2 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Journal of International Management Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-10 DOI:10.1016/j.intman.2025.101326
Amber Y. Chang , Yuhan Sun , Mark Loon
{"title":"A systematic review of replication studies in international management: What has been done so far, and what needs to be done in the future?","authors":"Amber Y. Chang ,&nbsp;Yuhan Sun ,&nbsp;Mark Loon","doi":"10.1016/j.intman.2025.101326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study is the first scholarly attempt to systematically review replication studies in the area of international management. We identified 57 replication studies in rigorous journals covering the period up to early 2025. We carefully went through all the identified articles, classified them into six categories of replication, and synthesized eight recurring themes. We outlined the key debates in those themes and summarized the key findings and contributions of representative replication studies. Most of the replication studies were unable to fully reproduce the results of the replicated study. Compared to the original studies, the replication studies have shown significant advancements in various aspects, notably in variable measurement, data collection approach, and data analysis techniques. Many studies have moved beyond mere replication and methodological updates and have contributed fresh theoretical insights that extend the field. Although limited in numbers, the fruitful outcomes of the prior replication studies not only indicate a growing recognition of replication as a relevant method in the field of international management but also highlight the potential power of this type of research to advance theoretical developments. We made practical recommendations for future replication studies in the end.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47937,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Management","volume":"32 2","pages":"Article 101326"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075425325001048","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study is the first scholarly attempt to systematically review replication studies in the area of international management. We identified 57 replication studies in rigorous journals covering the period up to early 2025. We carefully went through all the identified articles, classified them into six categories of replication, and synthesized eight recurring themes. We outlined the key debates in those themes and summarized the key findings and contributions of representative replication studies. Most of the replication studies were unable to fully reproduce the results of the replicated study. Compared to the original studies, the replication studies have shown significant advancements in various aspects, notably in variable measurement, data collection approach, and data analysis techniques. Many studies have moved beyond mere replication and methodological updates and have contributed fresh theoretical insights that extend the field. Although limited in numbers, the fruitful outcomes of the prior replication studies not only indicate a growing recognition of replication as a relevant method in the field of international management but also highlight the potential power of this type of research to advance theoretical developments. We made practical recommendations for future replication studies in the end.
国际管理中重复性研究的系统回顾:到目前为止已经做了什么,未来需要做什么?
本研究是对国际管理领域的复制研究进行系统回顾的首次学术尝试。我们在严谨的期刊上确定了57项重复性研究,涵盖时间一直到2025年初。我们仔细检查了所有确定的文章,将它们分为6类复制,并合成了8个反复出现的主题。我们概述了这些主题的关键争论,并总结了代表性重复性研究的主要发现和贡献。大多数重复性研究无法完全再现重复性研究的结果。与原始研究相比,复制研究在变量测量、数据收集方法和数据分析技术等方面都有了显著的进步。许多研究已经超越了单纯的复制和方法更新,并贡献了扩展该领域的新鲜理论见解。虽然数量有限,但先前的复制研究的丰硕成果不仅表明人们越来越认识到复制是国际管理领域的一种相关方法,而且还突出了这类研究促进理论发展的潜在力量。最后,我们对今后的重复性研究提出了切实可行的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
9.80%
发文量
67
审稿时长
81 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of International Management is devoted to advancing an understanding of issues in the management of global enterprises, global management theory, and practice; and providing theoretical and managerial implications useful for the further development of research. It is designed to serve an audience of academic researchers and educators, as well as business professionals, by publishing both theoretical and empirical research relating to international management and strategy issues. JIM publishes theoretical and empirical research addressing international business strategy, comparative and cross-cultural management, risk management, organizational behavior, and human resource management, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书