Compound Climate Events and Cascading Impacts in the IPCC AR6 : Analysis of Gaps and Avenues for the AR7

Virginie K. E. Duvat
{"title":"Compound Climate Events and Cascading Impacts in the IPCC AR6 : Analysis of Gaps and Avenues for the AR7","authors":"Virginie K. E. Duvat","doi":"10.1002/wcc.70046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Compound weather and climate events and risks (CE) and their cascading impacts (CI) have emerged as new key risks to human societies and ecosystems and have therefore become a major focus of climate research. Here, we review the coverage of CE and CI in the IPCC's Sixth Assessment Working Group I (WGI) and Working Group II (WGII) reports to inform priorities for their treatment in the <jats:styled-content>7th</jats:styled-content> IPCC cycle. We analyze the use of the terms <jats:italic>compound</jats:italic> ( <jats:italic>ing</jats:italic> ) ( <jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 422) and <jats:italic>cascade</jats:italic> ( <jats:italic>ing</jats:italic> ) ( <jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 216), considering five variables: conceptual landscape, CE type, system, geography, and time horizon. The results reveal a strong conceptual and narrative disconnect between the two IPCC reports, with a separate treatment of CE and CI, and a limited bridging of CE and CI with climate change adaptation; six new types of emerging CE; the prevalence of compound flooding, compound droughts, and compound heat/heatwaves/droughts and/or wildfires. The most heavily cited regions are Oceania and Africa for CE and the Arctic for CI, whereas the most cited archetypes are coastal and urban areas. Post‐AR6 literature provides conceptual and methodological frameworks to help overcome the limitations of the AR6's treatment of CE and CI over the 7 <jats:styled-content>th</jats:styled-content> IPCC cycle. These include a conceptual framework, models for cause‐effect‐response process chain analysis across systems, borders and timescales, and grounded storyline and pathway approaches. The outlines of the AR7 offer powerful opportunities to fill the AR6 conceptual, topical, and risk narrative gaps, by identifying CE and CI and their links with adaptation as key cross‐cutting areas. This article is categorized under: <jats:list list-type=\"simple\"> <jats:list-item> Climate, History, Society, Culture &gt; Ideas and Knowledge </jats:list-item> <jats:list-item> Integrated Assessment of Climate Change &gt; Integrated Assessment by Expert Panels </jats:list-item> <jats:list-item> Trans‐disciplinary Perspectives &gt; Regional Reviews </jats:list-item> </jats:list>","PeriodicalId":501019,"journal":{"name":"WIREs Climate Change","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WIREs Climate Change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.70046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Compound weather and climate events and risks (CE) and their cascading impacts (CI) have emerged as new key risks to human societies and ecosystems and have therefore become a major focus of climate research. Here, we review the coverage of CE and CI in the IPCC's Sixth Assessment Working Group I (WGI) and Working Group II (WGII) reports to inform priorities for their treatment in the 7th IPCC cycle. We analyze the use of the terms compound ( ing ) ( N = 422) and cascade ( ing ) ( N = 216), considering five variables: conceptual landscape, CE type, system, geography, and time horizon. The results reveal a strong conceptual and narrative disconnect between the two IPCC reports, with a separate treatment of CE and CI, and a limited bridging of CE and CI with climate change adaptation; six new types of emerging CE; the prevalence of compound flooding, compound droughts, and compound heat/heatwaves/droughts and/or wildfires. The most heavily cited regions are Oceania and Africa for CE and the Arctic for CI, whereas the most cited archetypes are coastal and urban areas. Post‐AR6 literature provides conceptual and methodological frameworks to help overcome the limitations of the AR6's treatment of CE and CI over the 7 th IPCC cycle. These include a conceptual framework, models for cause‐effect‐response process chain analysis across systems, borders and timescales, and grounded storyline and pathway approaches. The outlines of the AR7 offer powerful opportunities to fill the AR6 conceptual, topical, and risk narrative gaps, by identifying CE and CI and their links with adaptation as key cross‐cutting areas. This article is categorized under: Climate, History, Society, Culture > Ideas and Knowledge Integrated Assessment of Climate Change > Integrated Assessment by Expert Panels Trans‐disciplinary Perspectives > Regional Reviews
IPCC AR6中的复合气候事件和级联影响:AR7的差距和途径分析
复合天气和气候事件和风险(CE)及其级联影响(CI)已成为人类社会和生态系统面临的新的关键风险,因此已成为气候研究的主要焦点。在此,我们回顾了IPCC第六评估工作组I (WGI)和第二评估工作组(WGI)报告中CE和CI的覆盖范围,以告知IPCC第7个周期中处理它们的优先事项。我们分析了术语复合型(N = 422)和级联型(N = 216)的使用,考虑了五个变量:概念景观、CE类型、系统、地理和时间范围。研究结果表明,IPCC的两份报告在概念和叙述上存在明显的脱节,对气候变化和可持续发展的处理是分开的,并且气候变化和可持续发展与气候变化适应之间的联系有限;六种新型的新兴行政长官;复合洪水、复合干旱、复合高温/热浪/干旱和/或野火的流行。被引用最多的地区是大洋洲和非洲的CE和北极的CI,而被引用最多的原型是沿海和城市地区。AR6后文献提供了概念和方法框架,以帮助克服AR6在第7个IPCC周期内处理CE和CI的局限性。其中包括概念框架,跨系统、边界和时间尺度的因果反应过程链分析模型,以及接地线和途径方法。第七次评估报告的纲要为填补第六次评估报告在概念、专题和风险叙述方面的空白提供了强有力的机会,方法是将环境保护和可持续发展及其与适应的联系确定为关键的交叉领域。本文可分为:气候、历史、社会、文化;气候变化的思想与知识综合评估;专家小组综合评估;跨学科视角综合评估;区域综述
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书