Predictive factors for determining first-attempt success on the American Board of Cardiovascular Perfusion Certification Exams for graduates of a master's level perfusion education program.

The journal of extra-corporeal technology Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-13 DOI:10.1051/ject/2025062
Amber M Palmer
{"title":"Predictive factors for determining first-attempt success on the American Board of Cardiovascular Perfusion Certification Exams for graduates of a master's level perfusion education program.","authors":"Amber M Palmer","doi":"10.1051/ject/2025062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As demand for perfusionists grows due to increased cardiac procedures and retirements, improving first-time pass rates is essential to addressing workforce shortages. This quantitative study analyzed academic, demographic, and clinical variables as predictors of success on the American Board of Cardiovascular Perfusion (ABCP) exam.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Data were collected from 103 students enrolled in the master's-level Carlow University-University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Cardiovascular Perfusion program between 2017 and 2022 (IRB #02232024-1). Student-level variables included undergraduate GPA, grades in prerequisite courses, clinical experience hours, and admission status (graduate vs. undergraduate). Associations between these variables and first-time ABCP exam success were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Logistic regression analysis revealed that higher performance in Introduction to Cardiac Perfusion (B = 1.002, p = .008) and Hematology (B = .636, p = .028) significantly predicted first-time success on the ABCP exam. Admission as an undergraduate student was also a significant predictor (p = .004). However, neither the number of clinical experience hours nor the student's cohort year showed statistical significance (p > .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Academic performance in key foundational courses and student background (such as admission status) were significantly associated with first-time ABCP exam success. In contrast, the amount of clinical experience did not demonstrate a meaningful impact on pass rates. Further research should utilize a richer dataset that captures a more comprehensive view of perfusion program curricula, including detailed clinical training components. This would help clarify how specific educational experiences contribute to ABCP exam success and overall program outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":519952,"journal":{"name":"The journal of extra-corporeal technology","volume":"58 1","pages":"95-99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12984031/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of extra-corporeal technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/2025062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As demand for perfusionists grows due to increased cardiac procedures and retirements, improving first-time pass rates is essential to addressing workforce shortages. This quantitative study analyzed academic, demographic, and clinical variables as predictors of success on the American Board of Cardiovascular Perfusion (ABCP) exam.

Materials and methods: Data were collected from 103 students enrolled in the master's-level Carlow University-University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Cardiovascular Perfusion program between 2017 and 2022 (IRB #02232024-1). Student-level variables included undergraduate GPA, grades in prerequisite courses, clinical experience hours, and admission status (graduate vs. undergraduate). Associations between these variables and first-time ABCP exam success were examined.

Results: Logistic regression analysis revealed that higher performance in Introduction to Cardiac Perfusion (B = 1.002, p = .008) and Hematology (B = .636, p = .028) significantly predicted first-time success on the ABCP exam. Admission as an undergraduate student was also a significant predictor (p = .004). However, neither the number of clinical experience hours nor the student's cohort year showed statistical significance (p > .05).

Conclusion: Academic performance in key foundational courses and student background (such as admission status) were significantly associated with first-time ABCP exam success. In contrast, the amount of clinical experience did not demonstrate a meaningful impact on pass rates. Further research should utilize a richer dataset that captures a more comprehensive view of perfusion program curricula, including detailed clinical training components. This would help clarify how specific educational experiences contribute to ABCP exam success and overall program outcomes.

决定美国心血管灌注认证考试第一次尝试成功的预测因素硕士水平灌注教育项目的毕业生。
背景:由于心脏手术和退休人数的增加,对灌注师的需求不断增长,提高首次通过率对于解决劳动力短缺问题至关重要。本定量研究分析了学术、人口统计学和临床变量作为美国心血管灌注委员会(ABCP)检查成功的预测因素。材料和方法:数据收集自2017年至2022年期间卡洛大学-匹兹堡大学医学中心(UPMC)心血管灌注硕士课程(IRB #02232024-1)的103名学生。学生水平变量包括本科GPA、预修课程成绩、临床经验小时数和入学状态(研究生与本科生)。研究了这些变量与首次ABCP考试成功之间的关系。结果:Logistic回归分析显示,心脏灌注导论(B = 1.002, p = 0.008)和血液学(B = 0.636, p = 0.028)的良好表现显著预测了ABCP检查的首次成功。作为本科生入学也是显著的预测因子(p = 0.004)。然而,临床经验小时数和学生队列年均无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。结论:关键基础课程的学习成绩和学生背景(如入学状况)与首次ABCP考试的成功有显著关系。相比之下,临床经验的数量对通过率没有显着影响。进一步的研究应该利用更丰富的数据集来获取灌注计划课程的更全面的视图,包括详细的临床培训组成部分。这将有助于阐明具体的教育经历如何影响ABCP考试的成功和整个项目的成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书