Use of plasmapheresis during cardiopulmonary bypass in a pediatric heart transplant of a patient with Failing Fontan Physiology: first case in Argentina.
Matias Jorge Martinez, Ignacio Berra, Javier Cornelis, Juan Costilla, Fernando Zamora, Pablo Garcia Delucis
{"title":"Use of plasmapheresis during cardiopulmonary bypass in a pediatric heart transplant of a patient with Failing Fontan Physiology: first case in Argentina.","authors":"Matias Jorge Martinez, Ignacio Berra, Javier Cornelis, Juan Costilla, Fernando Zamora, Pablo Garcia Delucis","doi":"10.1051/ject/2025053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A 17-year-old male patient diagnosed with a single ventricle, in a failed Fontan stage, was evaluated prior to heart transplantation. The patient had a panel-reactive antibody (PRA) for human leucocyte antigen (HLA) I of 18% and for HLA II of 37%, so the decision was made to administer three doses of immunoglobulin while waiting for a donor heart.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Once extracorporeal circulation was initiated, the apheresis machine extracted blood from the patient's venous drainage and returned it to the oxygenator reservoir. A total of 8278 mL of blood was processed, and 4224 mL of plasma was extracted. For replacement, 1341 mL of fresh frozen plasma and 2700 mL of 5% albumin were used. 75 mL of citrate-dextrose acid (CDA) was used as an anticoagulant. The procedure lasted 135 min.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On the tenth postoperative day, the PRA for HLA I and II was 0%. On the thirtieth postoperative day, a catheterization with endomyocardial biopsy showed no evidence of immunological rejection. An echocardiogram showed good function of the heart graft. One year later, a catheterization with endomyocardial biopsy showed no signs of humoral rejection. The patient is currently in the third-year post-transplant and continues to show no signs of rejection in their progression.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Plasmapheresis during cardiopulmonary bypass is a reproducible, safe, and effective technique. It may be indicated for sensitized patients on the heart transplant waiting list.</p>","PeriodicalId":519952,"journal":{"name":"The journal of extra-corporeal technology","volume":"58 1","pages":"79-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12984029/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of extra-corporeal technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/2025053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: A 17-year-old male patient diagnosed with a single ventricle, in a failed Fontan stage, was evaluated prior to heart transplantation. The patient had a panel-reactive antibody (PRA) for human leucocyte antigen (HLA) I of 18% and for HLA II of 37%, so the decision was made to administer three doses of immunoglobulin while waiting for a donor heart.
Methods: Once extracorporeal circulation was initiated, the apheresis machine extracted blood from the patient's venous drainage and returned it to the oxygenator reservoir. A total of 8278 mL of blood was processed, and 4224 mL of plasma was extracted. For replacement, 1341 mL of fresh frozen plasma and 2700 mL of 5% albumin were used. 75 mL of citrate-dextrose acid (CDA) was used as an anticoagulant. The procedure lasted 135 min.
Results: On the tenth postoperative day, the PRA for HLA I and II was 0%. On the thirtieth postoperative day, a catheterization with endomyocardial biopsy showed no evidence of immunological rejection. An echocardiogram showed good function of the heart graft. One year later, a catheterization with endomyocardial biopsy showed no signs of humoral rejection. The patient is currently in the third-year post-transplant and continues to show no signs of rejection in their progression.
Conclusion: Plasmapheresis during cardiopulmonary bypass is a reproducible, safe, and effective technique. It may be indicated for sensitized patients on the heart transplant waiting list.