Is continuous in-line blood gas monitoring reliable during cardiopulmonary bypass when PaO2 and PaCO2 are calculated rather than measured?

The journal of extra-corporeal technology Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-13 DOI:10.1051/ject/2025051
Min-Ho Lee, Tami Rosenthal
{"title":"Is continuous in-line blood gas monitoring reliable during cardiopulmonary bypass when PaO<sub>2</sub> and PaCO<sub>2</sub> are calculated rather than measured?","authors":"Min-Ho Lee, Tami Rosenthal","doi":"10.1051/ject/2025051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The accuracy and precision of continuous in-line blood gas monitoring (CILBGM) are crucial for optimal blood gas management during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and improved patient outcomes. CILBGM devices, such as the CDI 500/550 system, measure PaO<sub>2</sub> and PaCO<sub>2,</sub> and B-Capta measures PaO<sub>2</sub> through direct contact with arterial blood. However, the Quantum perfusion system with Quantum Ventilation<sub>2</sub> (Quantum System) does not measure but calculates PaO<sub>2</sub> and PaCO<sub>2</sub> using several non-invasive sensors and proprietary formulas. We have observed that the calculated in-line PaO<sub>2</sub> and PaCO<sub>2</sub> values from Quantum System are frequently significantly higher than those obtained from iSTAT, a point-of-care blood analyzer, exceeding acceptable targets.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study involving 81 patients who underwent cardiac surgery using the Quantum System with its own CILBGM and the FX05 oxygenator. The aim was to identify the degree, timing, and possible patterns of error of the calculated in-line PaO<sub>2</sub> and PaCO<sub>2</sub>.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our study showed that the errors of calculated in-line PaO<sub>2</sub> exceed the acceptable target at the 1st blood gas series and during the rewarming and rewarmed periods, correlating with patient weight. The calculated in-line PaCO<sub>2</sub> exhibited an upward drift during the rewarming period, correlating with the temperature gradient rather than patient weight. Based on several correlations identified, we derived a formula to predict FiO<sub>2</sub> based on patient weight, which would achieve the target PaO<sub>2</sub> at the 1st blood gas series when using the FX05 oxygenator.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We identified when and how the errors in calculating in-line PaO<sub>2</sub> and PaCO<sub>2</sub> occurred and developed several recommendations to minimize significant deviations from actual PaO<sub>2</sub> and PaCO<sub>2</sub> during CPB. Our results suggest that achieving acceptable PaO<sub>2</sub> and PaCO<sub>2</sub> calculations throughout CPB using a single universal formula for each, embedded in the Quantum System, is challenging due to the variety of oxygenators available, different patient sizes, and changing conditions during CPB.</p>","PeriodicalId":519952,"journal":{"name":"The journal of extra-corporeal technology","volume":"58 1","pages":"43-50"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12984026/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of extra-corporeal technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/2025051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The accuracy and precision of continuous in-line blood gas monitoring (CILBGM) are crucial for optimal blood gas management during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and improved patient outcomes. CILBGM devices, such as the CDI 500/550 system, measure PaO2 and PaCO2, and B-Capta measures PaO2 through direct contact with arterial blood. However, the Quantum perfusion system with Quantum Ventilation2 (Quantum System) does not measure but calculates PaO2 and PaCO2 using several non-invasive sensors and proprietary formulas. We have observed that the calculated in-line PaO2 and PaCO2 values from Quantum System are frequently significantly higher than those obtained from iSTAT, a point-of-care blood analyzer, exceeding acceptable targets.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective study involving 81 patients who underwent cardiac surgery using the Quantum System with its own CILBGM and the FX05 oxygenator. The aim was to identify the degree, timing, and possible patterns of error of the calculated in-line PaO2 and PaCO2.

Results: Our study showed that the errors of calculated in-line PaO2 exceed the acceptable target at the 1st blood gas series and during the rewarming and rewarmed periods, correlating with patient weight. The calculated in-line PaCO2 exhibited an upward drift during the rewarming period, correlating with the temperature gradient rather than patient weight. Based on several correlations identified, we derived a formula to predict FiO2 based on patient weight, which would achieve the target PaO2 at the 1st blood gas series when using the FX05 oxygenator.

Conclusion: We identified when and how the errors in calculating in-line PaO2 and PaCO2 occurred and developed several recommendations to minimize significant deviations from actual PaO2 and PaCO2 during CPB. Our results suggest that achieving acceptable PaO2 and PaCO2 calculations throughout CPB using a single universal formula for each, embedded in the Quantum System, is challenging due to the variety of oxygenators available, different patient sizes, and changing conditions during CPB.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在体外循环期间,连续在线血气监测是否可靠,当PaO2和PaCO2是计算而不是测量时?
背景:连续在线血气监测(CILBGM)的准确性和精密度对于体外循环(CPB)期间优化血气管理和改善患者预后至关重要。CILBGM设备,如CDI 500/550系统,测量PaO2和PaCO2, B-Capta通过直接接触动脉血来测量PaO2。然而,Quantum perfusion system with Quantum Ventilation2 (Quantum system)不测量PaO2和PaCO2,而是使用几个非侵入式传感器和专有公式计算。我们观察到,Quantum System计算出的在线PaO2和PaCO2值经常显著高于iSTAT(一种即时血液分析仪)获得的值,超出了可接受的目标。方法:我们对81例心脏手术患者进行回顾性研究,这些患者使用量子系统及其自身的CILBGM和FX05氧合器。目的是确定计算的在线PaO2和PaCO2的误差程度、时间和可能的模式。结果:我们的研究表明,在第一次血气系列和复温、复温期间,计算的在线PaO2误差超过可接受的目标,与患者体重相关。在复温期间,计算出的在线PaCO2呈上升趋势,与温度梯度相关,而与患者体重无关。基于确定的几个相关性,我们推导出一个基于患者体重预测FiO2的公式,当使用FX05氧合器时,该公式将达到第1血气系列的PaO2目标。结论:我们确定了在线PaO2和PaCO2计算错误的时间和方式,并提出了一些建议,以尽量减少CPB期间与实际PaO2和PaCO2的显著偏差。我们的研究结果表明,在整个CPB过程中,使用嵌入量子系统的单一通用公式来实现可接受的PaO2和PaCO2计算是具有挑战性的,因为可用的氧合器种类繁多,患者大小不同,以及CPB过程中不断变化的条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书