Perceived Value of Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner Certification and Retention: Case Study of a Rural South Texas Community.

IF 0.9
Megumi Sakamoto, Ziqiao Chen, Nandita Chaudhuri
{"title":"Perceived Value of Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner Certification and Retention: Case Study of a Rural South Texas Community.","authors":"Megumi Sakamoto, Ziqiao Chen, Nandita Chaudhuri","doi":"10.1097/JFN.0000000000000602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The recruitment and retention of sexual assault nurse examiners (SANEs) is a nationwide challenge, especially in the rural U.S.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine SANEs' perception of the certification and its relation to the certification renewal outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-three survey responses were collected from South Texas SANE certification program participants and were analyzed using t tests and linear probability regression models. In addition, we analyzed open-ended responses qualitatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The participants scored intrinsic value (e.g., internal benefits) higher than the extrinsic value (e.g., related to external factors). The effect of the value scores on the probability of renewal varied based on model specification. Nurses working on call and shifts had an increased probability of renewal compared with those working daytime. Extrinsic factors prevented most nurses from recertifying.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>To facilitate retention, institutional support that enhances the extrinsic value of the certification may be most effective for SANEs in rural communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":94079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forensic nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JFN.0000000000000602","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The recruitment and retention of sexual assault nurse examiners (SANEs) is a nationwide challenge, especially in the rural U.S.

Aim: To examine SANEs' perception of the certification and its relation to the certification renewal outcome.

Methods: Twenty-three survey responses were collected from South Texas SANE certification program participants and were analyzed using t tests and linear probability regression models. In addition, we analyzed open-ended responses qualitatively.

Results: The participants scored intrinsic value (e.g., internal benefits) higher than the extrinsic value (e.g., related to external factors). The effect of the value scores on the probability of renewal varied based on model specification. Nurses working on call and shifts had an increased probability of renewal compared with those working daytime. Extrinsic factors prevented most nurses from recertifying.

Discussion: To facilitate retention, institutional support that enhances the extrinsic value of the certification may be most effective for SANEs in rural communities.

性侵犯护士审查员认证和保留的感知价值:德克萨斯州南部农村社区的案例研究。
背景:性侵犯护士审查员(SANEs)的招聘和保留是一个全国性的挑战,特别是在美国农村。目的:研究SANEs对认证的看法及其与认证更新结果的关系。方法:收集来自南德克萨斯州SANE认证项目参与者的23份调查问卷,采用t检验和线性概率回归模型进行分析。此外,我们对开放式回答进行了定性分析。结果:参与者对内在价值(如内部利益)的评分高于外在价值(如与外部因素相关)。数值分数对更新概率的影响因模型规格而异。与白天工作的护士相比,随叫随到和轮班工作的护士更新的可能性更高。外部因素阻碍了大多数护士重新认证。讨论:为了便于保留,提高证书外在价值的体制支持对农村社区的安全认证机构可能是最有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书