Comparison of Multimodal Analgesia and Narcotic Regimen for Postoperative Pain Control of Plastic Surgery Breast Procedures.

Eplasty Pub Date : 2025-11-06 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01
Sarah Moffitt, Bilal Koussayer, Kristina Buller, Meredith G Moore, Mariel McLaughlin, Jenna Stoehr, Riley Schlub, Michael Doarn, Jared Troy, Waylon Zeng, Nicholas Peterman, Audrey Korte, Morgan Parker, Anthony Capito
{"title":"Comparison of Multimodal Analgesia and Narcotic Regimen for Postoperative Pain Control of Plastic Surgery Breast Procedures.","authors":"Sarah Moffitt, Bilal Koussayer, Kristina Buller, Meredith G Moore, Mariel McLaughlin, Jenna Stoehr, Riley Schlub, Michael Doarn, Jared Troy, Waylon Zeng, Nicholas Peterman, Audrey Korte, Morgan Parker, Anthony Capito","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Opioid analgesics are commonly used for postoperative pain management in plastic surgery, despite risks regarding dependence and complications. This study evaluates the noninferiority of multimodal analgesia compared with traditional narcotic regimens for postoperative pain management in breast reduction mammoplasty and tissue expander placement following mastectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study of 171 patients (107 breast reduction, 64 tissue expander placement) was conducted at a single tertiary academic medical center between 2018 and 2022. Patients received either multimodal analgesia (preoperative acetaminophen 1000 mg, postoperative tramadol 50 mg q6h PRN, and gabapentin 300 mg TID) or narcotic analgesia (hydrocodone-acetaminophen 5-325 mg q6h PRN). Pain intensity was measured using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain intensity scores at the 2-week postoperative visit. Supplemental pain medication requests were tracked for analgesic groups as a measure of inadequate pain control.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the breast reduction group, the mean difference in PROMIS scores between multimodal (57.29) and narcotic (56.24) groups was 1.05 (95% CI, -2.81-4.91), below the minimal clinically meaningful difference of 10 points. For tissue expander placement, the mean difference was -2.76 (95% CI, -8.73-3.21). No significant differences were found in supplemental medication requests between groups for either procedure (<i>P</i> > .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multimodal analgesia provides pain control comparable to traditional narcotic regimens in breast procedures. This approach may reduce opioid exposure with comparable patient-reported outcomes, supporting multimodal analgesic protocols as a strategy to mitigate opioid use in plastic surgery patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":93993,"journal":{"name":"Eplasty","volume":"25 ","pages":"e42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12975526/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Opioid analgesics are commonly used for postoperative pain management in plastic surgery, despite risks regarding dependence and complications. This study evaluates the noninferiority of multimodal analgesia compared with traditional narcotic regimens for postoperative pain management in breast reduction mammoplasty and tissue expander placement following mastectomy.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study of 171 patients (107 breast reduction, 64 tissue expander placement) was conducted at a single tertiary academic medical center between 2018 and 2022. Patients received either multimodal analgesia (preoperative acetaminophen 1000 mg, postoperative tramadol 50 mg q6h PRN, and gabapentin 300 mg TID) or narcotic analgesia (hydrocodone-acetaminophen 5-325 mg q6h PRN). Pain intensity was measured using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain intensity scores at the 2-week postoperative visit. Supplemental pain medication requests were tracked for analgesic groups as a measure of inadequate pain control.

Results: In the breast reduction group, the mean difference in PROMIS scores between multimodal (57.29) and narcotic (56.24) groups was 1.05 (95% CI, -2.81-4.91), below the minimal clinically meaningful difference of 10 points. For tissue expander placement, the mean difference was -2.76 (95% CI, -8.73-3.21). No significant differences were found in supplemental medication requests between groups for either procedure (P > .05).

Conclusions: Multimodal analgesia provides pain control comparable to traditional narcotic regimens in breast procedures. This approach may reduce opioid exposure with comparable patient-reported outcomes, supporting multimodal analgesic protocols as a strategy to mitigate opioid use in plastic surgery patients.

多模式镇痛与麻醉方案对乳房整形术后疼痛控制的比较。
背景:阿片类镇痛药通常用于整形外科术后疼痛管理,尽管存在依赖性和并发症的风险。本研究评估了在乳房切除术后缩乳和组织扩张器放置的术后疼痛管理中,多模式镇痛与传统麻醉方案的非劣效性。方法:2018 - 2022年在某三级学术医疗中心对171例患者(107例缩乳,64例组织扩张器置入术)进行回顾性队列研究。患者接受多模式镇痛(术前对乙酰氨基酚1000 mg,术后曲马多50 mg q6h PRN,加巴喷丁300 mg TID)或麻醉镇痛(氢可酮-对乙酰氨基酚5-325 mg q6h PRN)。术后2周随访时,采用患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)疼痛强度评分测量疼痛强度。作为疼痛控制不足的衡量标准,对镇痛组补充止痛药的要求进行了跟踪。结果:缩乳组PROMIS评分与麻醉组(56.24)的平均差异为1.05分(95% CI, -2.81 ~ 4.91),低于最小临床意义差值10分。对于组织扩张器放置,平均差异为-2.76 (95% CI, -8.73-3.21)。两组间补充用药要求无显著差异(P < 0.05)。结论:在乳房手术中,多模式镇痛提供了与传统麻醉方案相当的疼痛控制。这种方法可以减少阿片类药物的暴露,并具有可比较的患者报告的结果,支持多模式镇痛方案作为减少整形手术患者阿片类药物使用的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书