Breast Cancers With Discordant Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization-Positive (Group 1) and Immunohistochemistry-Negative (0/1+) Results Following American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline.

IF 3.2
Diane Wilcock, Jolanta Jedrzkiewicz, Allison S Cleary, Cameron Beech, H Evin Gulbahce
{"title":"Breast Cancers With Discordant Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization-Positive (Group 1) and Immunohistochemistry-Negative (0/1+) Results Following American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guideline.","authors":"Diane Wilcock, Jolanta Jedrzkiewicz, Allison S Cleary, Cameron Beech, H Evin Gulbahce","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2025-0490-OA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) have been widely used for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status determination in breast cancers for about 25 years. Most laboratories use IHC as the first line of testing in both primary and metastatic breast cancers. Implementation of and updates to the ASCO/CAP guidelines have improved the reported discrepancy between IHC and FISH results.</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To investigate the incidence of discordance between IHC and FISH after the most recent guideline update and to determine possible underlying causes.</p><p><strong>Design.—: </strong>Breast cancer cases simultaneously tested for HER2 by IHC and FISH from January 2023 through July 2024 were identified. Information on clinicopathologic features and follow-up on cases with discordant results were obtained from electronic records.</p><p><strong>Results.—: </strong>IHC-negative/FISH-positive discordance was identified in 10 of 956 cases (1.1%). Discordance was significantly more commonly seen in tissues from metastatic sites where ischemic and fixation times were not documented owing to unknown primary site at the time of biopsy. IHC-negative/FISH-positive cases had significantly lower HER2 copy number per cell in discordant cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>Dual IHC and FISH testing, especially from metastatic sites, may need to be considered to ensure all patients eligible for targeted therapies are identified. Significant differences in HER2 copy numbers between discordant and concordant cases raise the possibility of underlying biologic differences and require further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":93883,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"503-512"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2025-0490-OA","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context.—: Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) have been widely used for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status determination in breast cancers for about 25 years. Most laboratories use IHC as the first line of testing in both primary and metastatic breast cancers. Implementation of and updates to the ASCO/CAP guidelines have improved the reported discrepancy between IHC and FISH results.

Objective.—: To investigate the incidence of discordance between IHC and FISH after the most recent guideline update and to determine possible underlying causes.

Design.—: Breast cancer cases simultaneously tested for HER2 by IHC and FISH from January 2023 through July 2024 were identified. Information on clinicopathologic features and follow-up on cases with discordant results were obtained from electronic records.

Results.—: IHC-negative/FISH-positive discordance was identified in 10 of 956 cases (1.1%). Discordance was significantly more commonly seen in tissues from metastatic sites where ischemic and fixation times were not documented owing to unknown primary site at the time of biopsy. IHC-negative/FISH-positive cases had significantly lower HER2 copy number per cell in discordant cases.

Conclusions.—: Dual IHC and FISH testing, especially from metastatic sites, may need to be considered to ensure all patients eligible for targeted therapies are identified. Significant differences in HER2 copy numbers between discordant and concordant cases raise the possibility of underlying biologic differences and require further investigation.

人表皮生长因子受体2荧光原位杂交阳性(1组)和免疫组织化学阴性(0/1+)结果不一致的乳腺癌遵循美国临床肿瘤学会/美国病理学家学会指南。
上下文。免疫组织化学(IHC)和荧光原位杂交(FISH)技术在乳腺癌中广泛应用于人表皮生长因子受体2 (HER2)状态的测定已有25年的历史。大多数实验室使用免疫组化作为原发性和转移性乳腺癌的一线检测。ASCO/CAP指南的实施和更新改善了IHC和FISH结果之间的差异。-:调查最新指南更新后IHC和FISH之间不一致的发生率,并确定可能的潜在原因。-:从2023年1月到2024年7月,同时通过IHC和FISH检测HER2的乳腺癌病例被确定。从电子记录中获得临床病理特征和对结果不一致病例的随访信息。-: 956例中有10例(1.1%)发现ihc阴性/ fish阳性不一致。在转移部位的组织中,由于活检时原发部位未知,缺血和固定时间未记录,因此不一致更常见。在不一致的病例中,ihc阴性/ fish阳性病例的每细胞HER2拷贝数显著降低。-:可能需要考虑双重IHC和FISH检测,特别是转移部位的检测,以确保所有符合靶向治疗条件的患者都被确定。不一致病例和一致病例之间HER2拷贝数的显著差异提出了潜在生物学差异的可能性,需要进一步调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书