Evaluating bowel preparation tolerability in IBD: a phase 3 post-hoc comparison of mannitol and PEG-ASC.

Gian Eugenio Tontini, Alessandro Rimondi, Flavio Caprioli, Giovanni Aldinio, Luca Pastorelli, Franco Radaelli, Cristiano Spada, Maurizio Vecchi
{"title":"Evaluating bowel preparation tolerability in IBD: a phase 3 <i>post-hoc</i> comparison of mannitol and PEG-ASC.","authors":"Gian Eugenio Tontini, Alessandro Rimondi, Flavio Caprioli, Giovanni Aldinio, Luca Pastorelli, Franco Radaelli, Cristiano Spada, Maurizio Vecchi","doi":"10.3389/fgstr.2025.1630479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bowel preparation is a significant challenge for patients undergoing colonoscopy, especially in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) patients. Oral mannitol (OM), an ultra-low-volume, single-dose osmotic laxative with a sweet taste, could improve patient tolerability. We performed a <i>post-hoc</i> analysis of the phase 3, multicentre, randomized, endoscopist-blinded SATISFACTION trial to compare same-day OM versus standard split-dose 2L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbate (PEG-ASC) for bowel preparation in IBD patients. Fifty-five IBD patients (24 OM, 31 PEG-ASC) were assessed for bowel cleansing efficacy, endoscopic outcomes, safety, and patient satisfaction. OM demonstrated superior tolerability, including ease of use (88% <i>vs</i>. 71%), taste satisfaction (75% <i>vs</i>. 6%), and willingness to reuse (96% <i>vs</i>. 71%). OM also reduced intake duration (32 <i>vs</i>. 107 minutes) and time to evacuation (57 <i>vs</i>. 91 minutes), with comparable efficacy, cleansing quality, and safety. In conclusion, same-day OM preparation enhances satisfaction and adherence in IBD patients, offering a safe, effective alternative to standard protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":73085,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland)","volume":"4 ","pages":"1630479"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12952433/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgstr.2025.1630479","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bowel preparation is a significant challenge for patients undergoing colonoscopy, especially in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) patients. Oral mannitol (OM), an ultra-low-volume, single-dose osmotic laxative with a sweet taste, could improve patient tolerability. We performed a post-hoc analysis of the phase 3, multicentre, randomized, endoscopist-blinded SATISFACTION trial to compare same-day OM versus standard split-dose 2L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbate (PEG-ASC) for bowel preparation in IBD patients. Fifty-five IBD patients (24 OM, 31 PEG-ASC) were assessed for bowel cleansing efficacy, endoscopic outcomes, safety, and patient satisfaction. OM demonstrated superior tolerability, including ease of use (88% vs. 71%), taste satisfaction (75% vs. 6%), and willingness to reuse (96% vs. 71%). OM also reduced intake duration (32 vs. 107 minutes) and time to evacuation (57 vs. 91 minutes), with comparable efficacy, cleansing quality, and safety. In conclusion, same-day OM preparation enhances satisfaction and adherence in IBD patients, offering a safe, effective alternative to standard protocols.

评估肠准备对IBD的耐受性:甘露醇和PEG-ASC的3期事后比较
对于接受结肠镜检查的患者,特别是炎症性肠病(IBD)患者,肠道准备是一项重大挑战。口服甘露醇(OM)是一种超低体积、单剂量的渗透性泻药,具有甜味,可以提高患者的耐受性。我们对3期、多中心、随机、内窥镜师盲法的SATISFACTION试验进行了事后分析,比较同日OM与标准分剂量2L聚乙二醇加抗坏血酸(PEG-ASC)用于IBD患者肠道准备的效果。对55名IBD患者(24名OM, 31名PEG-ASC)进行了肠道清洁疗效、内镜结果、安全性和患者满意度的评估。OM表现出优越的耐受性,包括易用性(88%对71%),味道满意度(75%对6%)和重复使用的意愿(96%对71%)。OM还缩短了吸入时间(32分钟对107分钟)和疏散时间(57分钟对91分钟),具有相当的功效、清洁质量和安全性。总之,当天OM准备提高了IBD患者的满意度和依从性,为标准方案提供了一种安全、有效的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书