Longitudinal profiles of executive function in autistic and non-autistic children at high likelihood of autism.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Tanya St John, Neva M Corrigan, Ariel Rokem, Annette M Estes, Heather C Hazlett, Juhi Pandey, Robert T Schultz, Natasha Marrus, Lonnie Zwaigenbaum, Chimei M Lee, Stephen R Dager, Joseph Piven
{"title":"Longitudinal profiles of executive function in autistic and non-autistic children at high likelihood of autism.","authors":"Tanya St John, Neva M Corrigan, Ariel Rokem, Annette M Estes, Heather C Hazlett, Juhi Pandey, Robert T Schultz, Natasha Marrus, Lonnie Zwaigenbaum, Chimei M Lee, Stephen R Dager, Joseph Piven","doi":"10.1186/s11689-026-09682-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND: Executive functioning (EF) difficulties are common in autistic children and may aggregate in families. Longitudinal studies examining EF development in autistic children and their siblings are limited. In the current study, we characterized EF development from later infancy through school-age in autistic and non-autistic high likelihood (HL; with an older autistic sibling) and low likelihood (LL; without older autistic sibling) children. METHODS: Participants were 83 autistic and 235 non-autistic HL children, and 132 LL children from the Infant Brain Imaging Study. EF was assessed at ages 12 and 24 months using the A-not-B task and ages 5–14 years (school-age) using the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF), Flanker Inhibitory Control and Attention Test (Flanker), and Dimensional Change Card Sort (DCCS). Longitudinal profiles of EF were examined using linear mixed-effects models with three separate models for each school-age EF outcome. RESULTS: From 12–24 months, the LL group showed an increase in standardized EF scores (p < 0.05). The HL-ASD and HL-noASD groups showed no change (ps > .05). From 24 months to school-age, no change was observed for any group (ps > .05). From 12 months to school-age, standardized scores in the LL group increased (p = 0.002) and in the HL-ASD group (p < .001) decreased for the BRIEF GEC outcome. There were no group differences at 12 months in standardized EF scores (ps > .05) but at 24-months both HL groups had lower scores than the LL group (ps < .05). At school-age, the HL-ASD group had lower standardized EF scores than the LL and HL-noASD groups on all measures (ps < or = .050), and the HL-noASD group had lower standardized scores than the LL group on the BRIEF GEC (p = .014). CONCLUSIONS: Autistic and non-autistic HL children and LL children showed distinct EF profiles. On lab-based measures, autistic and non-autistic HL children showed relatively stable EF performance over time while LL children showed initial improvements. Parent report showed accumulating EF difficulties in autistic HL children. Executive function supports starting in toddlerhood may be useful for HL children showing emerging EF difficulties. </p>","PeriodicalId":16530,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13093929/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s11689-026-09682-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Executive functioning (EF) difficulties are common in autistic children and may aggregate in families. Longitudinal studies examining EF development in autistic children and their siblings are limited. In the current study, we characterized EF development from later infancy through school-age in autistic and non-autistic high likelihood (HL; with an older autistic sibling) and low likelihood (LL; without older autistic sibling) children. METHODS: Participants were 83 autistic and 235 non-autistic HL children, and 132 LL children from the Infant Brain Imaging Study. EF was assessed at ages 12 and 24 months using the A-not-B task and ages 5–14 years (school-age) using the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF), Flanker Inhibitory Control and Attention Test (Flanker), and Dimensional Change Card Sort (DCCS). Longitudinal profiles of EF were examined using linear mixed-effects models with three separate models for each school-age EF outcome. RESULTS: From 12–24 months, the LL group showed an increase in standardized EF scores (p < 0.05). The HL-ASD and HL-noASD groups showed no change (ps > .05). From 24 months to school-age, no change was observed for any group (ps > .05). From 12 months to school-age, standardized scores in the LL group increased (p = 0.002) and in the HL-ASD group (p < .001) decreased for the BRIEF GEC outcome. There were no group differences at 12 months in standardized EF scores (ps > .05) but at 24-months both HL groups had lower scores than the LL group (ps < .05). At school-age, the HL-ASD group had lower standardized EF scores than the LL and HL-noASD groups on all measures (ps < or = .050), and the HL-noASD group had lower standardized scores than the LL group on the BRIEF GEC (p = .014). CONCLUSIONS: Autistic and non-autistic HL children and LL children showed distinct EF profiles. On lab-based measures, autistic and non-autistic HL children showed relatively stable EF performance over time while LL children showed initial improvements. Parent report showed accumulating EF difficulties in autistic HL children. Executive function supports starting in toddlerhood may be useful for HL children showing emerging EF difficulties.

高自闭症可能性自闭症儿童和非自闭症儿童执行功能的纵向分布。
背景:执行功能(EF)困难在自闭症儿童中很常见,并可能在家庭中聚集。关于自闭症儿童及其兄弟姐妹EF发展的纵向研究是有限的。在目前的研究中,我们描述了自闭症和非自闭症儿童从婴儿期后期到学龄的EF发展的高可能性(HL;有一个年长的自闭症兄弟姐妹)和低可能性(LL;没有年长的自闭症兄弟姐妹)。方法:研究对象为来自婴儿脑成像研究的83名自闭症儿童和235名非自闭症儿童,以及132名自闭症儿童。在12个月和24个月时使用A-not-B任务评估EF,在5-14岁(学龄)时使用执行功能行为评定量表(BRIEF)、Flanker抑制控制和注意测试(Flanker)和维度变化卡片分类(DCCS)评估EF。使用线性混合效应模型对每个学龄儿童的EF结果进行了三个独立模型的纵向分析。结果:从12-24个月开始,LL组的标准化EF评分升高(p . 0.05)。从24个月到学龄,没有观察到任何组的变化(ps >.05)。从12个月到学龄,HL组和HL- asd组的标准化得分分别增加(p = 0.002)和(p .05),但在24个月时,HL组和HL组的标准化得分均低于LL组(p . 0.05)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
4.10%
发文量
58
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders is an open access journal that integrates current, cutting-edge research across a number of disciplines, including neurobiology, genetics, cognitive neuroscience, psychiatry and psychology. The journal’s primary focus is on the pathogenesis of neurodevelopmental disorders including autism, fragile X syndrome, tuberous sclerosis, Turner Syndrome, 22q Deletion Syndrome, Prader-Willi and Angelman Syndrome, Williams syndrome, lysosomal storage diseases, dyslexia, specific language impairment and fetal alcohol syndrome. With the discovery of specific genes underlying neurodevelopmental syndromes, the emergence of powerful tools for studying neural circuitry, and the development of new approaches for exploring molecular mechanisms, interdisciplinary research on the pathogenesis of neurodevelopmental disorders is now increasingly common. Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders provides a unique venue for researchers interested in comparing and contrasting mechanisms and characteristics related to the pathogenesis of the full range of neurodevelopmental disorders, sharpening our understanding of the etiology and relevant phenotypes of each condition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书