Development and Validation of a Prognostic Model to Predict Mortality in Patients With Heart Failure With Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction After Acute Myocardial Infarction.

IF 1.4 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Cardiology Research Pub Date : 2026-02-28 eCollection Date: 2026-02-01 DOI:10.14740/cr2096
Zhi Can Liu, Ling Ling Zhang, Li Peng, Jian Ping Zeng, Ming Yan Jiang
{"title":"Development and Validation of a Prognostic Model to Predict Mortality in Patients With Heart Failure With Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction After Acute Myocardial Infarction.","authors":"Zhi Can Liu, Ling Ling Zhang, Li Peng, Jian Ping Zeng, Ming Yan Jiang","doi":"10.14740/cr2096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurately assessing mortality risk in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains challenging. This study developed and validated a mortality risk predictive model for such patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center retrospective study of 873 hospitalized patients with HFmrEF after AMI, 611 patients were included in the training cohort and 262 in the validation cohort. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality over an average 33-month follow-up. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression identified predictive variables for post-discharge mortality, with model performance assessed via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and decision curve analysis (DCA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six mortality risk predictors were identified: age, stroke history, New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification, hemoglobin (Hb) levels, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) implementation. The C-index for training and validation cohorts was 0.795 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.758-0.832) and 0.741 (95% CI, 0.672-0.81), respectively. Training cohort area under the curve (AUC) metrics for 6-month, 2-year, and 3-year survival were 0.861, 0.805, and 0.815; for the validation cohort, they were 0.722, 0.742, and 0.736.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A validated predictive model assessing mortality risk in HFmrEF patients post-AMI was established. External validation in future studies is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":9424,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology Research","volume":"17 1","pages":"10-22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12978395/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14740/cr2096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Accurately assessing mortality risk in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains challenging. This study developed and validated a mortality risk predictive model for such patients.

Methods: In this single-center retrospective study of 873 hospitalized patients with HFmrEF after AMI, 611 patients were included in the training cohort and 262 in the validation cohort. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality over an average 33-month follow-up. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression identified predictive variables for post-discharge mortality, with model performance assessed via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results: Six mortality risk predictors were identified: age, stroke history, New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification, hemoglobin (Hb) levels, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) implementation. The C-index for training and validation cohorts was 0.795 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.758-0.832) and 0.741 (95% CI, 0.672-0.81), respectively. Training cohort area under the curve (AUC) metrics for 6-month, 2-year, and 3-year survival were 0.861, 0.805, and 0.815; for the validation cohort, they were 0.722, 0.742, and 0.736.

Conclusions: A validated predictive model assessing mortality risk in HFmrEF patients post-AMI was established. External validation in future studies is recommended.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

急性心肌梗死后轻度射血分数降低心力衰竭患者死亡率预测模型的建立和验证。
背景:准确评估急性心肌梗死(AMI)后心力衰竭伴轻度射血分数降低(HFmrEF)患者的死亡风险仍然具有挑战性。本研究开发并验证了此类患者的死亡率风险预测模型。方法:对873例AMI后HFmrEF住院患者进行单中心回顾性研究,其中训练组611例,验证组262例。主要结果是平均33个月随访期间的全因死亡率。最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)回归确定了出院后死亡率的预测变量,并通过受试者工作特征(ROC)分析和决策曲线分析(DCA)评估了模型的性能。结果:确定了6个死亡风险预测因素:年龄、卒中史、纽约心脏协会(NYHA)分类、血红蛋白(Hb)水平、估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)和原发性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PPCI)的实施。训练和验证队列的c指数分别为0.795(95%可信区间(CI), 0.758-0.832)和0.741 (95% CI, 0.672-0.81)。训练队列6个月、2年和3年生存率的曲线下面积(AUC)指标分别为0.861、0.805和0.815;对于验证队列,它们分别为0.722、0.742和0.736。结论:建立了经验证的HFmrEF患者ami后死亡风险预测模型。建议在未来的研究中进行外部验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiology Research
Cardiology Research CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Cardiology Research is an open access, peer-reviewed, international journal. All submissions relating to basic research and clinical practice of cardiology and cardiovascular medicine are in this journal''s scope. This journal focuses on publishing original research and observations in all cardiovascular medicine aspects. Manuscript types include original article, review, case report, short communication, book review, letter to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书