Assessment of No-Reflow in Patients With STEMI After Intracoronary Tirofiban After Opening of the Vessel.

IF 1.4 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Cardiology Research Pub Date : 2026-02-28 eCollection Date: 2026-02-01 DOI:10.14740/cr2180
Mohammed Ali Mohammed Hammad, Wael Anwar Elshahat Hassib, Mohamed Kamal Ibrahim Salama, Husna Irfan Thalib, Mohammed Moanes, Muhammad Reihan
{"title":"Assessment of No-Reflow in Patients With STEMI After Intracoronary Tirofiban After Opening of the Vessel.","authors":"Mohammed Ali Mohammed Hammad, Wael Anwar Elshahat Hassib, Mohamed Kamal Ibrahim Salama, Husna Irfan Thalib, Mohammed Moanes, Muhammad Reihan","doi":"10.14740/cr2180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>No-reflow phenomenon (NRP) following primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) remains a critical determinant of adverse outcomes in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) cases despite successful epicardial recanalization. The core purpose of this study was to establish the value of intracoronary (IC) tirofiban, delivered via the IC route, in mitigating the occurrence of NRP for STEMI cases subsequent to successful vessel reopening.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized controlled double-blind study enrolled 60 STEMI cases. Following successful PCI, cases with thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade less than 3 were randomized to receive either IC tirofiban (25 ug/kg) or saline 0.9% as placebo, in addition to standard pre-procedural therapy with aspirin, heparin, and ticagrelor. TIMI flow grade and incidence of NRP were evaluated. Additionally, ST-T normalization in electrocardiogram (ECG) was assessed. Bleeding complications and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) were recorded during hospitalization and at 30-day follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The tirofiban group demonstrated notably superior coronary flow restoration with 80% achieving TIMI 3 flow versus 46.67% in controls (P = 0.007). NRP occurred in 20% of tirofiban cases compared to 53.33% in controls (P = 0.007). Minor bleeding complications increased in the tirofiban group (26.67% versus 3.33%, P = 0.026), while major bleeding remained absent in both groups. Total in-hospital MACEs were notably reduced with tirofiban treatment compared to controls (3.33% versus 30%, P = 0.012).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In STEMI cases following PPCI, IC tirofiban administration effectively reduces NRP, improves coronary flow restoration, and reduces MACE despite increased minor bleeding risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":9424,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology Research","volume":"17 1","pages":"23-31"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12978383/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14740/cr2180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: No-reflow phenomenon (NRP) following primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) remains a critical determinant of adverse outcomes in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) cases despite successful epicardial recanalization. The core purpose of this study was to establish the value of intracoronary (IC) tirofiban, delivered via the IC route, in mitigating the occurrence of NRP for STEMI cases subsequent to successful vessel reopening.

Methods: This randomized controlled double-blind study enrolled 60 STEMI cases. Following successful PCI, cases with thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade less than 3 were randomized to receive either IC tirofiban (25 ug/kg) or saline 0.9% as placebo, in addition to standard pre-procedural therapy with aspirin, heparin, and ticagrelor. TIMI flow grade and incidence of NRP were evaluated. Additionally, ST-T normalization in electrocardiogram (ECG) was assessed. Bleeding complications and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) were recorded during hospitalization and at 30-day follow-up.

Results: The tirofiban group demonstrated notably superior coronary flow restoration with 80% achieving TIMI 3 flow versus 46.67% in controls (P = 0.007). NRP occurred in 20% of tirofiban cases compared to 53.33% in controls (P = 0.007). Minor bleeding complications increased in the tirofiban group (26.67% versus 3.33%, P = 0.026), while major bleeding remained absent in both groups. Total in-hospital MACEs were notably reduced with tirofiban treatment compared to controls (3.33% versus 30%, P = 0.012).

Conclusions: In STEMI cases following PPCI, IC tirofiban administration effectively reduces NRP, improves coronary flow restoration, and reduces MACE despite increased minor bleeding risk.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

STEMI患者冠状动脉内替罗非班开通血管后无再流的评估。
背景:在心外膜再通成功的st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)病例中,经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PPCI)后的无回流现象(NRP)仍然是不良结局的关键决定因素。本研究的核心目的是确定冠状动脉内(IC)替罗非班在STEMI患者血管成功重新开放后减轻NRP发生的价值。方法:随机对照双盲研究纳入60例STEMI病例。PCI成功后,心肌梗死溶栓(TIMI)血流等级小于3级的患者随机接受IC替罗非班(25 ug/kg)或0.9%生理盐水作为安慰剂,此外还有阿司匹林、肝素和替格瑞洛的标准术前治疗。评估TIMI流量等级和NRP发生率。此外,评估心电图ST-T正常化。住院期间和随访30天记录出血并发症和主要心脏不良事件(mace)。结果:替罗非班组冠状动脉血流恢复明显优于对照组,80%达到timi3血流,而对照组为46.67% (P = 0.007)。替罗非班组NRP发生率为20%,对照组为53.33% (P = 0.007)。替罗非班组轻度出血并发症增加(26.67% vs 3.33%, P = 0.026),两组均无大出血。与对照组相比,替罗非班治疗显著降低了住院总mace(3.33%对30%,P = 0.012)。结论:在PPCI后的STEMI病例中,IC替罗非班可有效降低NRP,改善冠状动脉血流恢复,并降低MACE,尽管轻度出血风险增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiology Research
Cardiology Research CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Cardiology Research is an open access, peer-reviewed, international journal. All submissions relating to basic research and clinical practice of cardiology and cardiovascular medicine are in this journal''s scope. This journal focuses on publishing original research and observations in all cardiovascular medicine aspects. Manuscript types include original article, review, case report, short communication, book review, letter to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书