Impact of the Federated Data Platform's digital surgery scheduling system on elective theatre utilisation at an NHS Trust: an interrupted time series analysis.

IF 6.2 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Elena Lammila-Escalera, Gabriele Kerr, Geva Greenfield, Benedict Hayhoe, Natalie Brewer, Carla Hearsum, Grazia Antonacci, Natasha Dsouza, Azeem Majeed, Ana Luisa Neves
{"title":"Impact of the Federated Data Platform's digital surgery scheduling system on elective theatre utilisation at an NHS Trust: an interrupted time series analysis.","authors":"Elena Lammila-Escalera, Gabriele Kerr, Geva Greenfield, Benedict Hayhoe, Natalie Brewer, Carla Hearsum, Grazia Antonacci, Natasha Dsouza, Azeem Majeed, Ana Luisa Neves","doi":"10.1136/bmjhci-2025-101949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the National Health Service (NHS) Federated Data Platform (FDP) Inpatient (IP) Care Coordination Solution (CCS) digital scheduling tool on elective theatre utilisation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An interrupted time series assessed changes in theatre utilisation and cancellations following tool adoption (January 2022). Weekly data spanned 90 weeks (April 2021-December 2023). Outcomes included weekly median theatre utilisation (actual, booked and bookings per session) and the percentage of cancelled bookings. Models incorporated a 5-week lag and estimated level (step-change) and trend (slope) effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postintervention level and trend increases were observed for booked (β=4.40, p=0.045; β=0.26, p=0.002) and actual (β=3.98, p=0.064; β=0.23, p=0.006) utilisation. Bookings per session showed a significant level increase (β=0.34, p=0.002) with no trend change (β=0.00, p=0.790). Across the postintervention period, compared with counterfactual estimates, booked and actual utilisation were 15.0% (95% CI 13.4% to 16.5%, p<0.0001) and 12.2% (95% CI 10.8% to 13.5%, p<0.0001) higher, while bookings per session were 10.9% (95% CI 9.5% to 12.4%, p<0.0001) higher. Significant positive effects were observed for urology, general surgery, gynaecology, plastic surgery and ophthalmology. A significant upward trend in cancellation rates was associated with the introduction of the tool (β=2.1, p=0.001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Findings suggest that centralised digital scheduling tools can improve theatre capacity by enabling more efficient use of existing capacity through improved scheduling visibility. Future research should explore differences in specialty-level usage and long-term sustainability of gains.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The introduction of the NHS FDP IP CCS product was associated with improved elective theatre utilisation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9050,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Health & Care Informatics","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12983765/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Health & Care Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2025-101949","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the National Health Service (NHS) Federated Data Platform (FDP) Inpatient (IP) Care Coordination Solution (CCS) digital scheduling tool on elective theatre utilisation.

Methods: An interrupted time series assessed changes in theatre utilisation and cancellations following tool adoption (January 2022). Weekly data spanned 90 weeks (April 2021-December 2023). Outcomes included weekly median theatre utilisation (actual, booked and bookings per session) and the percentage of cancelled bookings. Models incorporated a 5-week lag and estimated level (step-change) and trend (slope) effects.

Results: Postintervention level and trend increases were observed for booked (β=4.40, p=0.045; β=0.26, p=0.002) and actual (β=3.98, p=0.064; β=0.23, p=0.006) utilisation. Bookings per session showed a significant level increase (β=0.34, p=0.002) with no trend change (β=0.00, p=0.790). Across the postintervention period, compared with counterfactual estimates, booked and actual utilisation were 15.0% (95% CI 13.4% to 16.5%, p<0.0001) and 12.2% (95% CI 10.8% to 13.5%, p<0.0001) higher, while bookings per session were 10.9% (95% CI 9.5% to 12.4%, p<0.0001) higher. Significant positive effects were observed for urology, general surgery, gynaecology, plastic surgery and ophthalmology. A significant upward trend in cancellation rates was associated with the introduction of the tool (β=2.1, p=0.001).

Discussion: Findings suggest that centralised digital scheduling tools can improve theatre capacity by enabling more efficient use of existing capacity through improved scheduling visibility. Future research should explore differences in specialty-level usage and long-term sustainability of gains.

Conclusion: The introduction of the NHS FDP IP CCS product was associated with improved elective theatre utilisation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

联邦数据平台的数字手术调度系统对NHS信托择期剧院利用的影响:中断的时间序列分析。
目的:评估国民健康服务(NHS)联邦数据平台(FDP)住院病人(IP)护理协调解决方案(CCS)数字调度工具在选择性手术室利用方面的作用。方法:中断时间序列评估了采用工具后剧院利用率和取消的变化(2022年1月)。每周数据跨度为90周(2021年4月至2023年12月)。结果包括每周剧院利用率的中位数(实际的、预定的和每次的预订)和取消预订的百分比。模型纳入了5周的滞后和估计水平(阶跃变化)和趋势(斜率)效应。结果:干预后,预约利用率(β=4.40, p=0.045; β=0.26, p=0.002)和实际利用率(β=3.98, p=0.064; β=0.23, p=0.006)水平和趋势均有所上升。每次的预订量显示出显著的水平增加(β=0.34, p=0.002),没有趋势变化(β=0.00, p=0.790)。在整个干预后期间,与反事实估计相比,预定利用率和实际利用率为15.0% (95% CI 13.4%至16.5%)。讨论:研究结果表明,集中式数字调度工具可以通过提高调度可见性来更有效地利用现有容量,从而提高剧院容量。未来的研究应该探索专业水平使用的差异和收益的长期可持续性。结论:NHS FDP IP CCS产品的引入与选择性手术室利用率的提高有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
4.90%
发文量
40
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书