Stability Assessment of Spire and PlanetiQ Receiver Clocks and Its Implications for GNSS-RO Atmospheric Profiles

IF 5.3 2区 地球科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Zhe Li;Pengyue Sun;Xiaoming Wang;Dingyi Liu;Haobo Li;Ying Xu;Jinglei Zhang;Sizhe Shen;Hongxin Zhang
{"title":"Stability Assessment of Spire and PlanetiQ Receiver Clocks and Its Implications for GNSS-RO Atmospheric Profiles","authors":"Zhe Li;Pengyue Sun;Xiaoming Wang;Dingyi Liu;Haobo Li;Ying Xu;Jinglei Zhang;Sizhe Shen;Hongxin Zhang","doi":"10.1109/JSTARS.2026.3668804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Commercial SmallSats offer cost-effective alternatives to traditional GNSS radio occultation (GNSS-RO) missions through scalable constellation deployments. In GNSS-RO processing, the short-term stability of the LEO receiver clock is a key constraint on the feasibility and accuracy of undifferenced (UD) retrievals. Specifically, limited stability in compact receivers can introduce clock noise that degrades retrieval profiles and increases uncertainty. This study evaluated Spire and PlanetiQ onboard clock stability and quantified the impact on bending-angle and refractivity retrievals. Spire exhibited lower short-term clock stability, with 1-s clock stability exceeding <inline-formula><tex-math>$10^{-6}$</tex-math></inline-formula>, making UD infeasible, while its single-differenced (SD)-derived profiles remained consistent with UCAR and ECMWF reference datasets. In contrast, PlanetiQ exhibited better short-term stability, with the 1-s clock stability typically better than <inline-formula><tex-math>$10^{-9}$</tex-math></inline-formula>. Subsequent analyses were confined to clock segments with 1-s clock stability better than <inline-formula><tex-math>$10^{-12}$</tex-math></inline-formula>, sufficient for accurate SD and UD processing. For PlanetiQ, refractivity derived from both methods was in agreement between 10 and 25 km (mean bias <inline-formula><tex-math>$&lt; 0.05\\%$</tex-math></inline-formula>, STD <inline-formula><tex-math>$&lt; 1\\%$</tex-math></inline-formula>); above 25 km, SD showed slightly larger deviations due to reference-link noise. Across constellations, GPS showed the lowest deviations while GLONASS had the highest. Sensitivity tests with injected clock noise targeting 1-s clock stability over the range of <inline-formula><tex-math>$10^{-12}$</tex-math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><tex-math>$10^{-10}$</tex-math></inline-formula> showed that UD and SD were statistically comparable when 1-s clock stability was about <inline-formula><tex-math>$\\text{3.0}\\times \\text{10}^{-11}$</tex-math></inline-formula>, and the retrieval deviations increased with both altitude and noise amplitude. These results confirm that PlanetiQ’s high clock stability supports accurate SD and UD retrievals and provide valuable insights for oscillator selection, quality control, and processing strategy in cost-effective GNSS-RO missions.","PeriodicalId":13116,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing","volume":"19 ","pages":"8756-8772"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=11415667","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11415667/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Commercial SmallSats offer cost-effective alternatives to traditional GNSS radio occultation (GNSS-RO) missions through scalable constellation deployments. In GNSS-RO processing, the short-term stability of the LEO receiver clock is a key constraint on the feasibility and accuracy of undifferenced (UD) retrievals. Specifically, limited stability in compact receivers can introduce clock noise that degrades retrieval profiles and increases uncertainty. This study evaluated Spire and PlanetiQ onboard clock stability and quantified the impact on bending-angle and refractivity retrievals. Spire exhibited lower short-term clock stability, with 1-s clock stability exceeding $10^{-6}$, making UD infeasible, while its single-differenced (SD)-derived profiles remained consistent with UCAR and ECMWF reference datasets. In contrast, PlanetiQ exhibited better short-term stability, with the 1-s clock stability typically better than $10^{-9}$. Subsequent analyses were confined to clock segments with 1-s clock stability better than $10^{-12}$, sufficient for accurate SD and UD processing. For PlanetiQ, refractivity derived from both methods was in agreement between 10 and 25 km (mean bias $< 0.05\%$, STD $< 1\%$); above 25 km, SD showed slightly larger deviations due to reference-link noise. Across constellations, GPS showed the lowest deviations while GLONASS had the highest. Sensitivity tests with injected clock noise targeting 1-s clock stability over the range of $10^{-12}$ to $10^{-10}$ showed that UD and SD were statistically comparable when 1-s clock stability was about $\text{3.0}\times \text{10}^{-11}$, and the retrieval deviations increased with both altitude and noise amplitude. These results confirm that PlanetiQ’s high clock stability supports accurate SD and UD retrievals and provide valuable insights for oscillator selection, quality control, and processing strategy in cost-effective GNSS-RO missions.
Spire和PlanetiQ接收机时钟的稳定性评估及其对GNSS-RO大气剖面的影响
商业小型卫星通过可扩展的星座部署,为传统的GNSS无线电掩星(GNSS- ro)任务提供了具有成本效益的替代方案。在GNSS-RO处理中,低轨道接收机时钟的短期稳定性是制约无差(UD)反演可行性和精度的关键因素。具体来说,紧凑型接收机的有限稳定性会引入时钟噪声,从而降低检索曲线并增加不确定性。本研究评估了Spire和PlanetiQ机载时钟的稳定性,并量化了对弯曲角和折射恢复的影响。Spire表现出较低的短期时钟稳定性,1-s时钟稳定性超过$10^{-6}$,使得UD不可行,而其单差分(SD)衍生的剖面与UCAR和ECMWF参考数据集保持一致。相比之下,PlanetiQ表现出更好的短期稳定性,其1-s时钟稳定性通常优于$10^{-9}$。随后的分析仅限于1-s时钟稳定性优于$10^{-12}$的时钟段,足以进行精确的SD和UD处理。对于PlanetiQ,两种方法得出的折射率在10到25 km之间是一致的(平均偏差$< 0.05\%$, STD $< 1\%$);在25 km以上,由于参考链路噪声,SD的偏差略大。在星座之间,GPS显示的偏差最小,而GLONASS显示的偏差最大。在$10^{-12}$到$10^{-10}$范围内注入时钟噪声,对1-s时钟稳定性进行灵敏度测试,结果表明,当1-s时钟稳定性约为$\text{3.0}\倍\text{10}^{-11}$时,UD和SD具有统计学上的可比性,检索偏差随海拔高度和噪声幅度的增加而增加。这些结果证实,PlanetiQ的高时钟稳定性支持精确的SD和UD检索,并为具有成本效益的GNSS-RO任务中的振荡器选择,质量控制和处理策略提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
10.90%
发文量
563
审稿时长
4.7 months
期刊介绍: The IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing addresses the growing field of applications in Earth observations and remote sensing, and also provides a venue for the rapidly expanding special issues that are being sponsored by the IEEE Geosciences and Remote Sensing Society. The journal draws upon the experience of the highly successful “IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing” and provide a complementary medium for the wide range of topics in applied earth observations. The ‘Applications’ areas encompasses the societal benefit areas of the Global Earth Observations Systems of Systems (GEOSS) program. Through deliberations over two years, ministers from 50 countries agreed to identify nine areas where Earth observation could positively impact the quality of life and health of their respective countries. Some of these are areas not traditionally addressed in the IEEE context. These include biodiversity, health and climate. Yet it is the skill sets of IEEE members, in areas such as observations, communications, computers, signal processing, standards and ocean engineering, that form the technical underpinnings of GEOSS. Thus, the Journal attracts a broad range of interests that serves both present members in new ways and expands the IEEE visibility into new areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书