Tele-scoliosis-screening and treat protocol: A hybrid in-person and online approach for scoliosis treatment in remote patients.

Nikos Karavidas, Dionysios Tzatzaliaris
{"title":"Tele-scoliosis-screening and treat protocol: A hybrid in-person and online approach for scoliosis treatment in remote patients.","authors":"Nikos Karavidas, Dionysios Tzatzaliaris","doi":"10.5662/wjm.v16.i1.107307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adherence to treatment protocol is important prognostic factor for successful result in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treatment with bracing and/or physiotherapeutic scoliosis specific exercises. However, patients living away from specialized centers, have travelling and financial obstacles to receive proper care. Our clinic developed a specific protocol for online evaluation and treatment sessions.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of a hybrid in-person and online treatment protocol for scoliosis treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective matched case-control study. Our online evaluation required patient digital radiographs and eight standardized clinical photos, in standing and forward bending positions. An intensive in-person program was prescribed, to allow adequate teaching of physiotherapeutic scoliosis specific exercises or brace manufacturing when needed. Then, the patients followed a home-program of exercises, having regular online supervised sessions. They were asked to re-visit our clinic every 3-6 months. Our online intervention group (OIG) (combined in-person and online treatment) was consisted of 118 patients (103 females-15 males, mean Cobb angle 29.4°, Risser 0.8, age 12.6 years). Our inclusion criteria were Cobb angle 10°-40°, Risser 0-2, less 1-year post-menarche for girls, and permanent residence outside of our region. We used a retrospective matched-control group (MCG) with similar characteristics that received only in-person treatment (106 patients, 92 females-14 males, mean Cobb angle 27.1°, Risser 1.1, age 12.9 years). In the last 3 years totally 3092 online sessions were done for the OIG. Compliance was self-reported in both groups. Independent sample <i>t</i>-test were used for statistical analysis. Mean follow-up was 29.7 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compliance with exercises was significantly better (<i>P</i> = 0.006) in OIG (78.3% > 3 days/week) compared to MCG (52.8% > 3 days/week). In OIG 35% improved, 54% remained stable, and 11% progressed, while in MCG 23.6% improved, 56.6% stable, and 19.8% progressed (<i>P</i> = 0.04). The loss to follow-up was also significantly lower (<i>P</i> = 0.03) in the OIG (6 subjects, 5.1%) compared to MCG (10 subjects, 10.9%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our tele-scoliosis-screening and treat protocol significantly improved compliance, monitoring, and final treatment result in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients at high risk of progression. Online supervision can keep patient's motivation, allowing proper follow-up and can be used for patients with transportation barriers.</p>","PeriodicalId":94271,"journal":{"name":"World journal of methodology","volume":"16 1","pages":"107307"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12968779/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of methodology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v16.i1.107307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adherence to treatment protocol is important prognostic factor for successful result in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treatment with bracing and/or physiotherapeutic scoliosis specific exercises. However, patients living away from specialized centers, have travelling and financial obstacles to receive proper care. Our clinic developed a specific protocol for online evaluation and treatment sessions.

Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of a hybrid in-person and online treatment protocol for scoliosis treatment.

Methods: Retrospective matched case-control study. Our online evaluation required patient digital radiographs and eight standardized clinical photos, in standing and forward bending positions. An intensive in-person program was prescribed, to allow adequate teaching of physiotherapeutic scoliosis specific exercises or brace manufacturing when needed. Then, the patients followed a home-program of exercises, having regular online supervised sessions. They were asked to re-visit our clinic every 3-6 months. Our online intervention group (OIG) (combined in-person and online treatment) was consisted of 118 patients (103 females-15 males, mean Cobb angle 29.4°, Risser 0.8, age 12.6 years). Our inclusion criteria were Cobb angle 10°-40°, Risser 0-2, less 1-year post-menarche for girls, and permanent residence outside of our region. We used a retrospective matched-control group (MCG) with similar characteristics that received only in-person treatment (106 patients, 92 females-14 males, mean Cobb angle 27.1°, Risser 1.1, age 12.9 years). In the last 3 years totally 3092 online sessions were done for the OIG. Compliance was self-reported in both groups. Independent sample t-test were used for statistical analysis. Mean follow-up was 29.7 months.

Results: Compliance with exercises was significantly better (P = 0.006) in OIG (78.3% > 3 days/week) compared to MCG (52.8% > 3 days/week). In OIG 35% improved, 54% remained stable, and 11% progressed, while in MCG 23.6% improved, 56.6% stable, and 19.8% progressed (P = 0.04). The loss to follow-up was also significantly lower (P = 0.03) in the OIG (6 subjects, 5.1%) compared to MCG (10 subjects, 10.9%).

Conclusion: Our tele-scoliosis-screening and treat protocol significantly improved compliance, monitoring, and final treatment result in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients at high risk of progression. Online supervision can keep patient's motivation, allowing proper follow-up and can be used for patients with transportation barriers.

远程脊柱侧凸筛查和治疗方案:远程患者脊柱侧凸治疗的面对面和在线混合方法。
背景:坚持治疗方案是影响青少年特发性脊柱侧凸治疗成功的重要预后因素,支持和/或物理治疗性脊柱侧凸专项训练。然而,住在远离专业中心的病人,有旅行和经济上的障碍,无法得到适当的护理。我们的诊所制定了一套专门的在线评估和治疗方案。目的:评价面对面和在线混合治疗方案在脊柱侧凸治疗中的有效性。方法:回顾性匹配病例对照研究。我们的在线评估需要患者的数字x线照片和8张标准化的临床照片,包括站立和前屈姿势。一个密集的面对面的程序被规定,允许充分的教学物理治疗脊柱侧凸的具体练习或支具制造时需要。然后,患者遵循家庭锻炼计划,定期进行在线监督。他们被要求每3-6个月再次访问我们的诊所。我们的在线干预组(OIG)(面对面和在线联合治疗)包括118例患者(103例女性,15例男性,平均Cobb角29.4°,Risser 0.8,年龄12.6岁)。我们的纳入标准是Cobb角10°-40°,Risser角0-2,女孩月经初潮后不到1年,并且永久居住在本地区以外。我们采用了具有相似特征的回顾性匹配对照组(MCG),只接受了面对面治疗(106例患者,92例女性,14例男性,平均Cobb角27.1°,Risser角1.1,年龄12.9岁)。在过去三年中,OIG共完成了3092次在线会议。两组患者均自我报告依从性。采用独立样本t检验进行统计分析。平均随访29.7个月。结果:与MCG组(52.8% > 3天/周)相比,OIG组(78.3% > 3天/周)的运动依从性明显更好(P = 0.006)。OIG组35%好转,54%稳定,11%进展;MCG组23.6%好转,56.6%稳定,19.8%进展(P = 0.04)。与MCG组(10例,10.9%)相比,OIG组(6例,5.1%)的随访损失也显著降低(P = 0.03)。结论:我们的远程脊柱侧凸筛查和治疗方案显著提高了青少年特发性脊柱侧凸高风险患者的依从性、监测和最终治疗结果。在线监护可以保持患者的积极性,便于适当的随访,可用于交通不便的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书