Audience-Specific Health Communication: Mixed Methods Evaluation of the Maria Ciência AI-Assisted Knowledge Translation Tool.

IF 2.3 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
JMIR infodemiology Pub Date : 2026-03-03 DOI:10.2196/78843
Mariana Araújo-Pereira, Klauss Villalva-Serra, Gustavo Pires-Ramos, Beatriz Sousa-Peres, Joanã Nascimento Conceição-Oliveira, Sarah Dourado Maiche, Rebeca Rebouças da Cunha Silva, Bruno de Bezerril Andrade
{"title":"Audience-Specific Health Communication: Mixed Methods Evaluation of the Maria Ciência AI-Assisted Knowledge Translation Tool.","authors":"Mariana Araújo-Pereira, Klauss Villalva-Serra, Gustavo Pires-Ramos, Beatriz Sousa-Peres, Joanã Nascimento Conceição-Oliveira, Sarah Dourado Maiche, Rebeca Rebouças da Cunha Silva, Bruno de Bezerril Andrade","doi":"10.2196/78843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Scientific misinformation remains a major barrier to effective health communication. Bridging the gap between academic research and public understanding requires tools that simplify scientific language and adapt content to diverse audiences.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study presents Maria Ciência (LPCT-IGM), a specialized GPT-based assistant for science communication. The tool supports researchers in translating peer-reviewed scientific findings through simple prompts into accessible, ethically appropriate materials tailored for children, the general public, health professionals, and policymakers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The tool was configured using prompt engineering techniques and guided by curated reference materials on inclusive and nonstigmatizing scientific language. Materials derived from 47 public health papers resulted in 188 outputs, which were assessed by 121 evaluators using 4 criteria: clarity, level of detail, language suitability, and content quality. In addition, outputs generated by Maria Ciência were compared with those produced by a base large language model and with human-written science communication materials. Readability and linguistic accessibility were assessed using multiple established metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Worldwide, mean scores were high: clarity (4.90), language suitability (4.78), content quality (4.72), and level of detail (4.56), on a 5-point scale. Materials for children and the general public consistently achieved the highest ratings across all criteria. A targeted comparison with the base large language model demonstrated superior performance of Maria Ciência in contextual stability. Readability analyses indicated that Maria Ciência's outputs were significantly more accessible than human-written texts, while maintaining high legibility classifications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Maria Ciência demonstrates the potential of artificial intelligence-assisted tools to enhance knowledge translation and counter scientific misinformation by producing scalable, audience-specific content that balances accessibility and informational integrity.</p>","PeriodicalId":73554,"journal":{"name":"JMIR infodemiology","volume":"6 ","pages":"e78843"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12978924/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR infodemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/78843","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Scientific misinformation remains a major barrier to effective health communication. Bridging the gap between academic research and public understanding requires tools that simplify scientific language and adapt content to diverse audiences.

Objective: This study presents Maria Ciência (LPCT-IGM), a specialized GPT-based assistant for science communication. The tool supports researchers in translating peer-reviewed scientific findings through simple prompts into accessible, ethically appropriate materials tailored for children, the general public, health professionals, and policymakers.

Methods: The tool was configured using prompt engineering techniques and guided by curated reference materials on inclusive and nonstigmatizing scientific language. Materials derived from 47 public health papers resulted in 188 outputs, which were assessed by 121 evaluators using 4 criteria: clarity, level of detail, language suitability, and content quality. In addition, outputs generated by Maria Ciência were compared with those produced by a base large language model and with human-written science communication materials. Readability and linguistic accessibility were assessed using multiple established metrics.

Results: Worldwide, mean scores were high: clarity (4.90), language suitability (4.78), content quality (4.72), and level of detail (4.56), on a 5-point scale. Materials for children and the general public consistently achieved the highest ratings across all criteria. A targeted comparison with the base large language model demonstrated superior performance of Maria Ciência in contextual stability. Readability analyses indicated that Maria Ciência's outputs were significantly more accessible than human-written texts, while maintaining high legibility classifications.

Conclusions: Maria Ciência demonstrates the potential of artificial intelligence-assisted tools to enhance knowledge translation and counter scientific misinformation by producing scalable, audience-specific content that balances accessibility and informational integrity.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

针对特定受众的健康传播:Maria Ciência人工智能辅助知识翻译工具的混合方法评价。
背景:科学错误信息仍然是有效卫生沟通的主要障碍。弥合学术研究和公众理解之间的差距需要简化科学语言并使内容适应不同受众的工具。目的:介绍Maria Ciência (LPCT-IGM),一种基于gpt的科学传播专用助手。该工具支持研究人员通过简单的提示将同行评议的科学发现转化为适合儿童、公众、卫生专业人员和政策制定者的可获取、符合伦理的材料。方法:采用快速工程技术配置该工具,并以包容性和非污名化科学语言的精选参考材料为指导。来自47篇公共卫生论文的材料产生了188项产出,由121名评估人员使用4项标准进行评估:清晰度、详细程度、语言适宜性和内容质量。此外,还将Maria Ciência生成的输出与基础大型语言模型产生的输出以及人类编写的科学传播材料进行了比较。使用多种既定指标评估可读性和语言可及性。结果:在全球范围内,平均得分很高:清晰度(4.90),语言适用性(4.78),内容质量(4.72)和细节水平(4.56),满分为5分。面向儿童和公众的材料在所有标准中始终获得最高评级。与基础大型语言模型的针对性比较表明,Maria Ciência在上下文稳定性方面表现优异。可读性分析表明,Maria Ciência的输出比人类书写的文本更容易理解,同时保持了高易读性分类。结论:Maria Ciência展示了人工智能辅助工具的潜力,通过生产可扩展的、针对特定受众的内容来平衡可访问性和信息完整性,从而增强知识翻译和反击科学错误信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书