Navigating the Path to Employee Job Retention and Engagement in US Health Centers: A Moderated Mediation Analysis.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Xiao Li, Frank Tortorella, Jae Man Park
{"title":"Navigating the Path to Employee Job Retention and Engagement in US Health Centers: A Moderated Mediation Analysis.","authors":"Xiao Li, Frank Tortorella, Jae Man Park","doi":"10.1097/JHM-D-24-00185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Goal: </strong>This study examines the impact of supportive processes, work-life balance, and leadership on employees' job satisfaction, intention to stay, and job engagement at US health centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study utilizes secondary data from the Health Center Workforce Well-Being Survey conducted by the Health Resources and Services Administration from late November 2022 to mid-February 2023. We conducted cross-sectional moderated mediation analyses using Model 60 from the Hayes PROCESS macro to examine the effects of supportive health center processes, work-life balance, and leadership on employee job satisfaction and, subsequently, employees' intentions to stay and job engagement.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>The mediation analyses demonstrated that job satisfaction mediates the relationship between supportive processes and both intention to stay and job engagement. Moreover, work-life balance and leadership moderate the relationship between supportive processes and job satisfaction with different patterns. Leadership also plays a dual moderating role, reducing dependence on job satisfaction for employee intention to stay while amplifying its effect on job engagement.</p><p><strong>Practical applications: </strong>Our findings highlight the need for targeted workforce strategies in health center settings. Healthcare leaders should first enhance employees' job satisfaction by investing in workplace supportive processes, work-life balance initiatives, and leadership development tailored to their organizational context. After job satisfaction is strengthened, its influence on employees' intention to stay and job engagement remains contingent on leadership. The decision about how much to invest in leadership initiatives should be guided by the organization's current job satisfaction levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":51633,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Healthcare Management","volume":"71 2","pages":"122-139"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Healthcare Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHM-D-24-00185","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Goal: This study examines the impact of supportive processes, work-life balance, and leadership on employees' job satisfaction, intention to stay, and job engagement at US health centers.

Methods: This study utilizes secondary data from the Health Center Workforce Well-Being Survey conducted by the Health Resources and Services Administration from late November 2022 to mid-February 2023. We conducted cross-sectional moderated mediation analyses using Model 60 from the Hayes PROCESS macro to examine the effects of supportive health center processes, work-life balance, and leadership on employee job satisfaction and, subsequently, employees' intentions to stay and job engagement.

Principal findings: The mediation analyses demonstrated that job satisfaction mediates the relationship between supportive processes and both intention to stay and job engagement. Moreover, work-life balance and leadership moderate the relationship between supportive processes and job satisfaction with different patterns. Leadership also plays a dual moderating role, reducing dependence on job satisfaction for employee intention to stay while amplifying its effect on job engagement.

Practical applications: Our findings highlight the need for targeted workforce strategies in health center settings. Healthcare leaders should first enhance employees' job satisfaction by investing in workplace supportive processes, work-life balance initiatives, and leadership development tailored to their organizational context. After job satisfaction is strengthened, its influence on employees' intention to stay and job engagement remains contingent on leadership. The decision about how much to invest in leadership initiatives should be guided by the organization's current job satisfaction levels.

在美国卫生中心引导员工工作保留和敬业度之路:一个有调节的中介分析。
目的:本研究考察了美国医疗中心的支持性流程、工作与生活平衡和领导力对员工工作满意度、留任意愿和工作敬业度的影响。方法:本研究使用的二手数据来自卫生资源和服务管理局于2022年11月下旬至2023年2月中旬进行的卫生中心劳动力幸福感调查。我们使用Hayes PROCESS宏观模型60进行了横断面调节的中介分析,以检验支持性医疗中心流程、工作与生活平衡和领导力对员工工作满意度的影响,进而影响员工的留任意向和工作敬业度。主要发现:工作满意度在支持过程与留任意向和工作投入之间具有中介作用。此外,工作与生活平衡和领导对支持过程与工作满意度的关系有不同的调节模式。领导还具有双重调节作用,一方面降低了工作满意度对员工留任意愿的依赖,另一方面又放大了工作满意度对员工工作投入的影响。实际应用:我们的研究结果强调了在卫生中心设置有针对性的劳动力战略的必要性。医疗保健领导者应该首先通过投资于工作场所支持性流程、工作与生活平衡倡议和适合其组织环境的领导力发展来提高员工的工作满意度。在工作满意度得到强化后,其对员工留任意愿和工作投入的影响仍然取决于领导。应该根据组织当前的工作满意度水平来决定对领导主动性投资多少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Healthcare Management
Journal of Healthcare Management HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: The Journal of Healthcare Management is the official journal of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Six times per year, JHM offers timely healthcare management articles that inform and guide executives, managers, educators, and researchers. JHM also contains regular columns written by experts and practitioners in the field that discuss management-related topics and industry trends. Each issue presents an interview with a leading executive.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书