High red cell distribution width as a prognostic indicator in heart failure.

Sidhartha Gautam Senapati, Azra Kothawala, Vibhor Ahluwalia, Rupak Desai
{"title":"High red cell distribution width as a prognostic indicator in heart failure.","authors":"Sidhartha Gautam Senapati, Azra Kothawala, Vibhor Ahluwalia, Rupak Desai","doi":"10.5662/wjm.v16.i1.108611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Red cell distribution width (RDW) measures the red blood cell size variation. Elevated RDW has been associated with various adverse health outcomes, including cardiovascular diseases.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To analyze current evidence on the prognostic significance of high RDW in patients with heart failure (HF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar, up to May 2024. Studies were included if they investigated the relationship between RDW levels and outcomes in HF patients. Compared to those in the lowest quartile. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Compared to those in the lowest quartile. Heterogeneity was assessed using the <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> statistic, we assessed the impact of individual studies on the overall estimate using a leave-one-out sensitivity analysis and publication bias was evaluated through a contour-enhanced funnel plot and Luis Furuya-Kanamori (LFK) index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies, including a total of 11460 HF patients, were analyzed. The participants' mean age varied between 60 years and 80 years, with 6562 (57.26%) in the lower quartile. Patients in the highest quartile of RDW (> 15.21%) had a significantly increased risk of all-cause mortality, with an odds ratio of 1.84 (95%CI: 1.31-2.57, <i>P</i> < 0.001), compared to those in the lowest quartile (RDW: 14.1%-15.20%). There was significant variability in the included studies' results (<i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 93%, <i>P</i> < 0.01), as well as potential publication bias suggested by the high LFK index (8.47). Sensitivity analysis reinforced the robustness of these findings, showing that the results were not unduly influenced by any single study.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis confirms that high RDW is a robust predictor of adverse outcomes in patients with HF, highlighting its potential utility as a simple, cost-effective biomarker for risk stratification. Future research should focus on elucidating the mechanisms underlying this association and exploring the potential benefits of RDW-guided therapeutic strategies in HF management.</p>","PeriodicalId":94271,"journal":{"name":"World journal of methodology","volume":"16 1","pages":"108611"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12968752/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of methodology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v16.i1.108611","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Red cell distribution width (RDW) measures the red blood cell size variation. Elevated RDW has been associated with various adverse health outcomes, including cardiovascular diseases.

Aim: To analyze current evidence on the prognostic significance of high RDW in patients with heart failure (HF).

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar, up to May 2024. Studies were included if they investigated the relationship between RDW levels and outcomes in HF patients. Compared to those in the lowest quartile. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Compared to those in the lowest quartile. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I 2 statistic, we assessed the impact of individual studies on the overall estimate using a leave-one-out sensitivity analysis and publication bias was evaluated through a contour-enhanced funnel plot and Luis Furuya-Kanamori (LFK) index.

Results: Seven studies, including a total of 11460 HF patients, were analyzed. The participants' mean age varied between 60 years and 80 years, with 6562 (57.26%) in the lower quartile. Patients in the highest quartile of RDW (> 15.21%) had a significantly increased risk of all-cause mortality, with an odds ratio of 1.84 (95%CI: 1.31-2.57, P < 0.001), compared to those in the lowest quartile (RDW: 14.1%-15.20%). There was significant variability in the included studies' results (I 2 = 93%, P < 0.01), as well as potential publication bias suggested by the high LFK index (8.47). Sensitivity analysis reinforced the robustness of these findings, showing that the results were not unduly influenced by any single study.

Conclusion: This meta-analysis confirms that high RDW is a robust predictor of adverse outcomes in patients with HF, highlighting its potential utility as a simple, cost-effective biomarker for risk stratification. Future research should focus on elucidating the mechanisms underlying this association and exploring the potential benefits of RDW-guided therapeutic strategies in HF management.

高红细胞分布宽度作为心力衰竭的预后指标。
背景:红细胞分布宽度(RDW)衡量红细胞大小的变化。RDW升高与各种不良健康结果相关,包括心血管疾病。目的:分析高RDW对心力衰竭(HF)患者预后的影响。方法:对截至2024年5月的PubMed、EMBASE和谷歌Scholar等多个数据库进行全面的文献检索。如果研究了RDW水平与HF患者预后之间的关系,则纳入研究。与最低四分之一的人相比。主要结局为全因死亡率。与最低四分之一的人相比。使用i2统计量评估异质性,我们使用留一敏感性分析评估单个研究对总体估计的影响,并通过轮廓增强漏斗图和Luis Furuya-Kanamori (LFK)指数评估发表偏倚。结果:共分析了7项研究,共11460例HF患者。参与者的平均年龄在60岁到80岁之间,65.62人(57.26%)处于较低的四分位数。RDW最高四分位数的患者(bb0 15.21%)与RDW最低四分位数的患者(RDW: 14.1%-15.20%)相比,其全因死亡风险显著增加,比值比为1.84 (95%CI: 1.31-2.57, P < 0.001)。纳入的研究结果存在显著的变异性(i2 = 93%, P < 0.01),高LFK指数(8.47)提示存在潜在的发表偏倚。敏感性分析加强了这些发现的稳健性,表明结果不受任何单一研究的过度影响。结论:本荟萃分析证实,高RDW是心衰患者不良结局的可靠预测指标,突出了其作为一种简单、经济有效的风险分层生物标志物的潜在效用。未来的研究应侧重于阐明这种关联的机制,并探索rdw指导的心衰治疗策略的潜在益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书