Comparative Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of the Glucagon-Like-Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists Tirzepatide and Semaglutide in Solid-Organ Transplant Recipients.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 TRANSPLANTATION
Omar El Khatib, Maguy Chiha, Ola Jarad, Cynthia Salloum, Khaled El Baba, Ruba Dajani, Salma Al Shaqfa, Sandra El Hajj
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of the Glucagon-Like-Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists Tirzepatide and Semaglutide in Solid-Organ Transplant Recipients.","authors":"Omar El Khatib, Maguy Chiha, Ola Jarad, Cynthia Salloum, Khaled El Baba, Ruba Dajani, Salma Al Shaqfa, Sandra El Hajj","doi":"10.6002/ect.2025.0180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Diabetes mellitus, including new-onset diabetes after transplant, is a prevalent complication in solid-organ transplant recipients, often necessitating complex glycemic management. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, including semaglutide and tirzepatide, have shown promising outcomes in the general population, but comparative data in solid-organ transplant recipients are limited. In this study, we evaluated and compared the efficacy and safety of semaglutide and tirzepatide in a diverse cohort of solid-organ transplant recipients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective chart review study involved 73 solid-organ transplant recipients treated with semaglutide (n = 39) or tirzepatide (n = 34) at a quaternary care center in the United Arab Emirates. Efficacy endpoints included changes in weight, body mass index, hemoglobin A1c, fasting plasma glucose, insulin requirements, and serum triglycerides. As safety outcomes, we assessed adverse effects, immunosuppressant levels, and allograft function.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both agents significantly improved weight, body mass index, hemoglobin A1c, fasting plasma glucose, and triglyceride levels. Tirzepatide led to a greater reduction in median triglyceride levels compared with semaglutide, despite a significantly shorter treatment duration. Adverse events were more frequent in the semaglutide group, including gastrointestinal intolerance and infections, despite being confounded by disparities in follow-up duration. No significant changes in tacrolimus levels, graft function, or mortality were observed in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Tirzepatide and semaglutide were shown to be both effective and generally safe for mana-gement of diabetes mellitus in solid-organ transplant recipients. Tirzepatide may offer advantages in tolerability and rapid glycemic control. Prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings in larger, controlled cohorts.</p>","PeriodicalId":50467,"journal":{"name":"Experimental and Clinical Transplantation","volume":"24 2","pages":"173-181"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental and Clinical Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6002/ect.2025.0180","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Diabetes mellitus, including new-onset diabetes after transplant, is a prevalent complication in solid-organ transplant recipients, often necessitating complex glycemic management. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, including semaglutide and tirzepatide, have shown promising outcomes in the general population, but comparative data in solid-organ transplant recipients are limited. In this study, we evaluated and compared the efficacy and safety of semaglutide and tirzepatide in a diverse cohort of solid-organ transplant recipients.

Materials and methods: This retrospective chart review study involved 73 solid-organ transplant recipients treated with semaglutide (n = 39) or tirzepatide (n = 34) at a quaternary care center in the United Arab Emirates. Efficacy endpoints included changes in weight, body mass index, hemoglobin A1c, fasting plasma glucose, insulin requirements, and serum triglycerides. As safety outcomes, we assessed adverse effects, immunosuppressant levels, and allograft function.

Results: Both agents significantly improved weight, body mass index, hemoglobin A1c, fasting plasma glucose, and triglyceride levels. Tirzepatide led to a greater reduction in median triglyceride levels compared with semaglutide, despite a significantly shorter treatment duration. Adverse events were more frequent in the semaglutide group, including gastrointestinal intolerance and infections, despite being confounded by disparities in follow-up duration. No significant changes in tacrolimus levels, graft function, or mortality were observed in either group.

Conclusions: Tirzepatide and semaglutide were shown to be both effective and generally safe for mana-gement of diabetes mellitus in solid-organ transplant recipients. Tirzepatide may offer advantages in tolerability and rapid glycemic control. Prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings in larger, controlled cohorts.

胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂替西帕肽和西马鲁肽在实体器官移植受者中的疗效和安全性比较分析。
目的:糖尿病,包括移植后新发糖尿病,是实体器官移植受者的常见并发症,通常需要复杂的血糖管理。胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂,包括西马鲁肽和替西帕肽,在一般人群中显示出有希望的结果,但在实体器官移植受者中的比较数据有限。在这项研究中,我们评估并比较了西马鲁肽和替西帕肽在不同的实体器官移植受者队列中的有效性和安全性。材料和方法:本回顾性图表回顾研究涉及73例实体器官移植受者,在阿拉伯联合酋长国的一家第四护理中心接受了西马鲁肽(n = 39)或替西帕肽(n = 34)的治疗。疗效终点包括体重、体重指数、糖化血红蛋白、空腹血糖、胰岛素需求和血清甘油三酯的变化。作为安全性结果,我们评估了不良反应、免疫抑制剂水平和同种异体移植物功能。结果:两种药物均能显著改善体重、体重指数、糖化血红蛋白、空腹血糖和甘油三酯水平。与西马鲁肽相比,替西帕肽导致中位甘油三酯水平的更大降低,尽管治疗时间明显缩短。西马鲁肽组的不良事件更频繁,包括胃肠道不耐受和感染,尽管随访时间的差异使其混淆。两组患者他克莫司水平、移植物功能或死亡率均无显著变化。结论:替西帕肽和西马鲁肽对治疗实体器官移植受者的糖尿病既有效又普遍安全。替西帕肽在耐受性和快速血糖控制方面可能具有优势。前瞻性研究有必要在更大的对照队列中证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
258
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of the journal includes the following: Surgical techniques, innovations, and novelties; Immunobiology and immunosuppression; Clinical results; Complications; Infection; Malignancies; Organ donation; Organ and tissue procurement and preservation; Sociological and ethical issues; Xenotransplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书