Improving Maternal Health Equity and Outcomes Through the Development of a Clinician-Informed Algorithm: A Feasibility Study.

IF 1.2 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
JOURNAL OF AMBULATORY CARE MANAGEMENT Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-09 DOI:10.1097/JAC.0000000000000550
Jena Wallander Gemkow, Eve Walter, Nivedita Mohanty, Ta-Yun Yang, Rachel Caskey, Cristina Barkowski, Sadia Haider
{"title":"Improving Maternal Health Equity and Outcomes Through the Development of a Clinician-Informed Algorithm: A Feasibility Study.","authors":"Jena Wallander Gemkow, Eve Walter, Nivedita Mohanty, Ta-Yun Yang, Rachel Caskey, Cristina Barkowski, Sadia Haider","doi":"10.1097/JAC.0000000000000550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Increasing proportions of adverse maternal health outcomes occur in the 12-month postpartum period and could be addressed in outpatient settings. Our objective was to develop and test an algorithm to support a population health tool to identify high-risk prenatal patients served by federally qualified health centers (FQHCs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We leveraged human-centered design to develop and test the population health tool and algorithm. We conducted focus groups and a literature search to identify risk criteria for the tool. To evaluate the tool, we conducted structured interviews and predictive modeling to compare the recall between the original tool and the refined algorithm. The population health tool was initially tested using electronic health record (EHR) data at six pilot FQHCs. To test the model's predictive capacity, we expanded to 18 FQHCs. Focus group participants included FQHC clinicians and staff. Data to evaluate the population health tool were queried from prenatal patients receiving care at participating FQHCs. The primary outcomes were adverse outcomes addressed in outpatient settings and health care utilization within 12 months postpartum.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two focus groups (N = 7) were conducted to inform the implementation. In follow-up interviews (n = 6), users highlighted the tool's utility for identifying high-risk patients. In the predictive models (N = 82,829), the adverse outcome recall increased by 16%, but the algorithm only correctly predicted 42% of adverse outcomes experienced. The postpartum visit recall increased by 45%, with the algorithm correctly predicting 96% of visits utilized.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results of this project highlight the importance of a deep understanding of EHR data capture and the involvement of clinicians when developing, testing, and evaluating interventions aimed at optimizing care for vulnerable patient populations. Future research should incorporate inpatient, outpatient, and social determinants data to develop a more comprehensive understanding of maternal health risk in the postpartum period.</p>","PeriodicalId":46654,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF AMBULATORY CARE MANAGEMENT","volume":"49 2","pages":"E106-E118"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF AMBULATORY CARE MANAGEMENT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JAC.0000000000000550","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Increasing proportions of adverse maternal health outcomes occur in the 12-month postpartum period and could be addressed in outpatient settings. Our objective was to develop and test an algorithm to support a population health tool to identify high-risk prenatal patients served by federally qualified health centers (FQHCs).

Methods: We leveraged human-centered design to develop and test the population health tool and algorithm. We conducted focus groups and a literature search to identify risk criteria for the tool. To evaluate the tool, we conducted structured interviews and predictive modeling to compare the recall between the original tool and the refined algorithm. The population health tool was initially tested using electronic health record (EHR) data at six pilot FQHCs. To test the model's predictive capacity, we expanded to 18 FQHCs. Focus group participants included FQHC clinicians and staff. Data to evaluate the population health tool were queried from prenatal patients receiving care at participating FQHCs. The primary outcomes were adverse outcomes addressed in outpatient settings and health care utilization within 12 months postpartum.

Results: Two focus groups (N = 7) were conducted to inform the implementation. In follow-up interviews (n = 6), users highlighted the tool's utility for identifying high-risk patients. In the predictive models (N = 82,829), the adverse outcome recall increased by 16%, but the algorithm only correctly predicted 42% of adverse outcomes experienced. The postpartum visit recall increased by 45%, with the algorithm correctly predicting 96% of visits utilized.

Conclusion: Results of this project highlight the importance of a deep understanding of EHR data capture and the involvement of clinicians when developing, testing, and evaluating interventions aimed at optimizing care for vulnerable patient populations. Future research should incorporate inpatient, outpatient, and social determinants data to develop a more comprehensive understanding of maternal health risk in the postpartum period.

通过临床医生知情算法的发展改善孕产妇健康公平和结果:可行性研究。
目的:在产后12个月期间发生的不良孕产妇健康结果比例增加,可以在门诊环境中解决。我们的目标是开发和测试一种算法,以支持一种人口健康工具,以识别由联邦合格的健康中心(fqhc)服务的高危产前患者。方法:采用以人为本的设计方法,开发和测试人口健康工具和算法。我们进行了焦点小组和文献检索,以确定该工具的风险标准。为了评估该工具,我们进行了结构化访谈和预测建模,以比较原始工具和改进算法之间的召回率。人口健康工具最初在六个试点fqhc使用电子健康记录(EHR)数据进行了测试。为了测试模型的预测能力,我们将模型扩展到18个fqhc。焦点小组参与者包括FQHC的临床医生和工作人员。从参加fqhc的产前患者中查询评估人口健康工具的数据。主要结局是在门诊设置和产后12个月内的医疗保健利用解决不良后果。结果:进行了两个焦点小组(N = 7),以告知实施情况。在后续访谈中(n = 6),用户强调了该工具在识别高危患者方面的实用性。在预测模型(N = 82,829)中,不良结果召回率提高了16%,但该算法仅正确预测了42%的不良结果。产后访问回忆率提高了45%,该算法正确预测了96%的访问利用率。结论:该项目的结果强调了深入了解电子病历数据采集的重要性,以及临床医生在开发、测试和评估旨在优化弱势患者群体护理的干预措施时的参与。未来的研究应纳入住院、门诊和社会决定因素数据,以更全面地了解产后产妇健康风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF AMBULATORY CARE MANAGEMENT
JOURNAL OF AMBULATORY CARE MANAGEMENT HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: The Journal of Ambulatory Care Management is a PEER-REVIEWED journal that provides timely, applied information on the most important developments and issues in ambulatory care management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书