Knowledge, attitudes and current practices regarding LI-RADS®: A survey from 14 countries in sub-Saharan Africa.

IF 0.9 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
SA Journal of Radiology Pub Date : 2026-02-23 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.4102/sajr.v30i1.3367
Rajshree Segobin, Dale Creamer, Rufaida Khan, Eduard Jonas, Sanju Sobnach, Sulaiman Moosa
{"title":"Knowledge, attitudes and current practices regarding LI-RADS<sup>®</sup>: A survey from 14 countries in sub-Saharan Africa.","authors":"Rajshree Segobin, Dale Creamer, Rufaida Khan, Eduard Jonas, Sanju Sobnach, Sulaiman Moosa","doi":"10.4102/sajr.v30i1.3367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is highly prevalent in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). LI-RADS<sup>®</sup> is a standardised system for imaging-based diagnosis and characterisation of HCC.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study assessed knowledge, attitudes and current practices related to LI-RADS in SSA, with a view to identifying barriers to its utilisation and informing targeted educational interventions.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A 21-item anonymous electronic questionnaire was distributed to medical professionals in SSA using the SurveyMonkey online platform. Knowledge, attitudes and current practices regarding LI-RADS<sup>®</sup> were assessed. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, and comparisons were made between radiologists and non-radiologists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 134 respondents from 14 of the 34 SSA countries. Radiologists significantly outperformed non-radiologists in LI-RADS<sup>®</sup> knowledge, particularly regarding its purpose (65.6% vs 38.2%, <i>p</i> = 0.0007), arterial phase hyperenhancement definition (90.3% vs 59.8%, <i>p</i> = 0.004) and size criteria (77.4% vs 45.1%, <i>p</i> = 0.003) for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, 43.8% of radiologists and 63.4% of non-radiologists did not recognise the limitations of LI-RADS<sup>®</sup>. Only 34.3% stated that LI-RADS<sup>®</sup> was their reporting standard and 29.1% of the respondents indicated that less than 25% of their radiological reports adhered to LI-RADS<sup>®</sup>. The majority (78.3%) of participants stated they preferred radiology reports for high-risk liver lesions to be LI-RADS<sup>®</sup>-standardised. The two main barriers to adopting LI-RADS<sup>®</sup> included lack of consistency (44.8%) and unfamiliarity with the reporting system (27.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although LI-RADS<sup>®</sup> remains the preferred reporting system for HCC, there are significant gaps in its knowledge and implementation across SSA.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>This survey highlights the needs for targeted educational initiatives and improved training to enhance the adoption and use of LI-RADS<sup>®</sup> in SSA.</p>","PeriodicalId":43442,"journal":{"name":"SA Journal of Radiology","volume":"30 1","pages":"3367"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12969652/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SA Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajr.v30i1.3367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is highly prevalent in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). LI-RADS® is a standardised system for imaging-based diagnosis and characterisation of HCC.

Objectives: This study assessed knowledge, attitudes and current practices related to LI-RADS in SSA, with a view to identifying barriers to its utilisation and informing targeted educational interventions.

Method: A 21-item anonymous electronic questionnaire was distributed to medical professionals in SSA using the SurveyMonkey online platform. Knowledge, attitudes and current practices regarding LI-RADS® were assessed. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, and comparisons were made between radiologists and non-radiologists.

Results: There were 134 respondents from 14 of the 34 SSA countries. Radiologists significantly outperformed non-radiologists in LI-RADS® knowledge, particularly regarding its purpose (65.6% vs 38.2%, p = 0.0007), arterial phase hyperenhancement definition (90.3% vs 59.8%, p = 0.004) and size criteria (77.4% vs 45.1%, p = 0.003) for diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, 43.8% of radiologists and 63.4% of non-radiologists did not recognise the limitations of LI-RADS®. Only 34.3% stated that LI-RADS® was their reporting standard and 29.1% of the respondents indicated that less than 25% of their radiological reports adhered to LI-RADS®. The majority (78.3%) of participants stated they preferred radiology reports for high-risk liver lesions to be LI-RADS®-standardised. The two main barriers to adopting LI-RADS® included lack of consistency (44.8%) and unfamiliarity with the reporting system (27.6%).

Conclusion: Although LI-RADS® remains the preferred reporting system for HCC, there are significant gaps in its knowledge and implementation across SSA.

Contribution: This survey highlights the needs for targeted educational initiatives and improved training to enhance the adoption and use of LI-RADS® in SSA.

Abstract Image

关于LI-RADS®的知识、态度和当前做法:一项来自撒哈拉以南非洲14个国家的调查。
背景:肝细胞癌(HCC)在撒哈拉以南非洲(SSA)非常普遍。LI-RADS®是一种基于影像学诊断和HCC特征的标准化系统。目的:本研究评估了SSA中与LI-RADS相关的知识、态度和当前实践,以确定其使用的障碍并为有针对性的教育干预提供信息。方法:采用SurveyMonkey在线调查平台向SSA医疗专业人员发放21项匿名电子问卷。对LI-RADS®的知识、态度和现行做法进行了评估。使用描述性统计分析数据,并在放射科医生和非放射科医生之间进行比较。结果:来自34个SSA国家中的14个国家的134名受访者。放射科医生在LI-RADS®知识方面明显优于非放射科医生,特别是在诊断肝细胞癌(HCC)的目的(65.6%对38.2%,p = 0.0007)、动脉期高增强定义(90.3%对59.8%,p = 0.004)和大小标准(77.4%对45.1%,p = 0.003)方面。然而,43.8%的放射科医生和63.4%的非放射科医生没有认识到LI-RADS的局限性。只有34.3%的受访者表示LI-RADS®是他们的报告标准,29.1%的受访者表示不到25%的放射学报告遵循LI-RADS®。大多数(78.3%)的参与者表示,他们更喜欢LI-RADS®标准化的高危肝病变放射学报告。采用LI-RADS®的两个主要障碍包括缺乏一致性(44.8%)和不熟悉报告系统(27.6%)。结论:尽管LI-RADS®仍然是HCC的首选报告系统,但在SSA的知识和实施方面存在显着差距。贡献:这项调查强调了有针对性的教育活动和改进培训的需求,以提高LI-RADS®在SSA的采用和使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SA Journal of Radiology
SA Journal of Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
35
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The SA Journal of Radiology is the official journal of the Radiological Society of South Africa and the Professional Association of Radiologists in South Africa and Namibia. The SA Journal of Radiology is a general diagnostic radiological journal which carries original research and review articles, pictorial essays, case reports, letters, editorials, radiological practice and other radiological articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书