Development and prospective validation of a machine learning model to predict mortality in cirrhosis with esophageal variceal bleeding.

IF 3.4 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Matheus Machado Rech, Leandro Luis Corso, Elisa Fioreze Dal Bó, Andressa Daiane Ferraza, Fernanda Tomé, Alana Zulian Terres, Rafael Sartori Balbinot, Raul Angelo Balbinot, Silvana Sartori Balbinot, Jonathan Soldera
{"title":"Development and prospective validation of a machine learning model to predict mortality in cirrhosis with esophageal variceal bleeding.","authors":"Matheus Machado Rech, Leandro Luis Corso, Elisa Fioreze Dal Bó, Andressa Daiane Ferraza, Fernanda Tomé, Alana Zulian Terres, Rafael Sartori Balbinot, Raul Angelo Balbinot, Silvana Sartori Balbinot, Jonathan Soldera","doi":"10.4254/wjh.v18.i2.111099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute esophageal variceal bleeding (AEVB) is a critical complication in patients with cirrhosis, associated with high mortality despite advancements in management. Traditional prognostic scores often lack predictive accuracy in this context.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To develop, internally validate, and prospectively validate a machine learning (ML) model to predict 1-year mortality in patients with cirrhosis presenting with AEVB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort of 94 patients treated between 2010 and 2016 was used to train ML models, incorporating 36 clinical, laboratory, and imaging variables. Four algorithms (generalized linear models, boosted generalized linear models, naive Bayes, random forests) were evaluated, and the best-performing model was prospectively validated in a cohort of 24 patients treated between 2017 and 2018. Performance metrics included the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and calibration <i>via</i> Brier scores. Data preprocessing involved k-nearest neighbor imputation, one-hot encoding, and scaling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The random forest model achieved the highest AUC (0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.85-0.96) during internal validation and demonstrated robust performance in the prospective cohort (AUC 0.88, 95%CI: 0.80-0.94). Calibration was excellent, with a low Brier score (0.12). The model was deployed as an online prediction tool.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This ML model shows promise in improving mortality prediction for AEVB, potentially aiding timely clinical interventions and decision-making. Prospective validation underscores its generalizability and clinical utility. Future research should explore external validation in diverse settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":23687,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Hepatology","volume":"18 2","pages":"111099"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12968690/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v18.i2.111099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acute esophageal variceal bleeding (AEVB) is a critical complication in patients with cirrhosis, associated with high mortality despite advancements in management. Traditional prognostic scores often lack predictive accuracy in this context.

Aim: To develop, internally validate, and prospectively validate a machine learning (ML) model to predict 1-year mortality in patients with cirrhosis presenting with AEVB.

Methods: A retrospective cohort of 94 patients treated between 2010 and 2016 was used to train ML models, incorporating 36 clinical, laboratory, and imaging variables. Four algorithms (generalized linear models, boosted generalized linear models, naive Bayes, random forests) were evaluated, and the best-performing model was prospectively validated in a cohort of 24 patients treated between 2017 and 2018. Performance metrics included the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and calibration via Brier scores. Data preprocessing involved k-nearest neighbor imputation, one-hot encoding, and scaling.

Results: The random forest model achieved the highest AUC (0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.85-0.96) during internal validation and demonstrated robust performance in the prospective cohort (AUC 0.88, 95%CI: 0.80-0.94). Calibration was excellent, with a low Brier score (0.12). The model was deployed as an online prediction tool.

Conclusion: This ML model shows promise in improving mortality prediction for AEVB, potentially aiding timely clinical interventions and decision-making. Prospective validation underscores its generalizability and clinical utility. Future research should explore external validation in diverse settings.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

预测肝硬化伴食管静脉曲张出血患者死亡率的机器学习模型的开发和前瞻性验证。
背景:急性食管静脉曲张出血(AEVB)是肝硬化患者的重要并发症,尽管治疗取得了进展,但仍与高死亡率相关。在这种情况下,传统的预后评分往往缺乏预测准确性。目的:开发、内部验证和前瞻性验证机器学习(ML)模型,以预测肝硬化合并AEVB患者的1年死亡率。方法:对2010年至2016年间接受治疗的94例患者进行回顾性队列研究,纳入36个临床、实验室和影像学变量,对ML模型进行训练。评估了四种算法(广义线性模型、增强广义线性模型、朴素贝叶斯和随机森林),并在2017年至2018年期间接受治疗的24名患者的队列中前瞻性地验证了表现最佳的模型。性能指标包括曲线下面积(AUC)、灵敏度、特异性和通过Brier评分进行校准。数据预处理包括k近邻插值、单热编码和缩放。结果:随机森林模型在内部验证中获得了最高的AUC(0.91, 95%置信区间[CI]: 0.85-0.96),并在前瞻性队列中表现出稳健的性能(AUC 0.88, 95%CI: 0.80-0.94)。校正效果良好,Brier评分较低(0.12)。该模型被用作在线预测工具。结论:该ML模型有望提高AEVB的死亡率预测,有助于及时的临床干预和决策。前瞻性验证强调了其普遍性和临床实用性。未来的研究应该探索不同环境下的外部验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Hepatology
World Journal of Hepatology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
172
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书