Assessing the Quality of Consumer Health Information Within the Realm of Shoulder Injuries on TikTok.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2026-03-09 eCollection Date: 2026-03-01 DOI:10.1177/23259671261419114
Bashar Jawich, Haytham Alqasmi, Alqasim Elnaggar, Shadi Kotob, Omar Abdalla, Imran Bitar, Ameen Suhrawardy, Rahul Vaidya
{"title":"Assessing the Quality of Consumer Health Information Within the Realm of Shoulder Injuries on TikTok.","authors":"Bashar Jawich, Haytham Alqasmi, Alqasim Elnaggar, Shadi Kotob, Omar Abdalla, Imran Bitar, Ameen Suhrawardy, Rahul Vaidya","doi":"10.1177/23259671261419114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Shoulder pain and injury are among the most prevalent musculoskeletal presentations in primary care. With the rise of consumer health information on TikTok, it is pivotal to assess and determine whether the information produced by content creators can serve as a supplement for shoulder rehabilitation and injury prevention.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>It was hypothesized that content creators with professional degrees and extensive knowledge within the realm of shoulder injuries would yield valuable and accurate health information.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>On June 18, 2025, #ShoulderInjury was used as the search item under the TikTok search engine. A total of 9286 videos appeared after the initial search. The authors applied an inclusion criteria of at least 100 likes. Exclusion criteria removed irrelevant, non-English, and duplicate videos, resulting in 209 eligible videos for further analysis. These were evaluated using the DISCERN questionnaire, an instrument used to assess consumer health information on a 1 to 5 scale. Two independent raters scored the videos, and interrater reliability was calculated using weighted Cohen kappa.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 209 analyzed videos garnered 1,408,268 likes and 12,536 comments, with a mean DISCERN score of 2.61. Physicians' videos (n = 41) had the highest mean score (3.52), significantly outperforming nonprofessionals (2.18), physical therapists (2.87), and other professionals (2.79) in critical DISCERN areas (<i>P</i> < .001). Educational content yielded the highest mean score (3.29), whereas personal story videos had the lowest (1.89). Weighted Cohen kappa showed very good agreement for physician videos (κ = 0.82), moderate for physical therapists (κ = 0.59), good for nonprofessionals (κ = 0.79), and fair for other professionals (κ = 0.40).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the potential of TikTok as an effective educational tool when used by qualified professionals. Professionally produced content consistently scored higher on the DISCERN scale. Although the findings are promising, it is important to note limitations, like potential biases in DISCERN scoring due to nonblinded raters, the influence of TikTok's algorithm, and the exclusion of videos with <100 likes. Future research should explore social media's role in medical education and assess how to optimize content delivery and engagement.</p>","PeriodicalId":19646,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"14 3","pages":"23259671261419114"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12972568/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671261419114","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Shoulder pain and injury are among the most prevalent musculoskeletal presentations in primary care. With the rise of consumer health information on TikTok, it is pivotal to assess and determine whether the information produced by content creators can serve as a supplement for shoulder rehabilitation and injury prevention.

Hypothesis: It was hypothesized that content creators with professional degrees and extensive knowledge within the realm of shoulder injuries would yield valuable and accurate health information.

Study design: Cross-sectional study.

Methods: On June 18, 2025, #ShoulderInjury was used as the search item under the TikTok search engine. A total of 9286 videos appeared after the initial search. The authors applied an inclusion criteria of at least 100 likes. Exclusion criteria removed irrelevant, non-English, and duplicate videos, resulting in 209 eligible videos for further analysis. These were evaluated using the DISCERN questionnaire, an instrument used to assess consumer health information on a 1 to 5 scale. Two independent raters scored the videos, and interrater reliability was calculated using weighted Cohen kappa.

Results: The 209 analyzed videos garnered 1,408,268 likes and 12,536 comments, with a mean DISCERN score of 2.61. Physicians' videos (n = 41) had the highest mean score (3.52), significantly outperforming nonprofessionals (2.18), physical therapists (2.87), and other professionals (2.79) in critical DISCERN areas (P < .001). Educational content yielded the highest mean score (3.29), whereas personal story videos had the lowest (1.89). Weighted Cohen kappa showed very good agreement for physician videos (κ = 0.82), moderate for physical therapists (κ = 0.59), good for nonprofessionals (κ = 0.79), and fair for other professionals (κ = 0.40).

Conclusion: This study highlights the potential of TikTok as an effective educational tool when used by qualified professionals. Professionally produced content consistently scored higher on the DISCERN scale. Although the findings are promising, it is important to note limitations, like potential biases in DISCERN scoring due to nonblinded raters, the influence of TikTok's algorithm, and the exclusion of videos with <100 likes. Future research should explore social media's role in medical education and assess how to optimize content delivery and engagement.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在TikTok上评估肩部损伤领域的消费者健康信息的质量。
背景:肩部疼痛和损伤是初级保健中最常见的肌肉骨骼表现之一。随着TikTok上消费者健康信息的兴起,评估和确定内容创作者制作的信息是否可以作为肩部康复和伤害预防的补充是至关重要的。假设:假设在肩伤领域拥有专业学位和广泛知识的内容创作者将提供有价值和准确的健康信息。研究设计:横断面研究。方法:2025年6月18日,TikTok搜索引擎以#肩伤#为搜索项。经过初步搜索,总共出现了9286个视频。作者采用了至少100个赞的入选标准。排除标准删除了不相关的、非英语的和重复的视频,得到209个符合条件的视频进行进一步分析。这些都是使用DISCERN问卷进行评估的,这是一种用于评估消费者健康信息的工具,分为1到5级。两个独立的评分者对视频进行评分,使用加权科恩卡帕法计算评分者的信度。结果:209个被分析的视频获得了1,408,268个赞和12,536条评论,平均辨别得分为2.61。医师视频(n = 41)的平均得分最高(3.52),在关键领域显著优于非专业人士(2.18)、物理治疗师(2.87)和其他专业人士(2.79)(P < .001)。教育内容的平均得分最高(3.29分),而个人故事视频的平均得分最低(1.89分)。加权科恩kappa显示,医师视频的一致性非常好(κ = 0.82),物理治疗师的一致性中等(κ = 0.59),非专业人士的一致性很好(κ = 0.79),其他专业人士的一致性一般(κ = 0.40)。结论:这项研究强调了TikTok作为一种有效的教育工具,在合格的专业人员使用时的潜力。专业制作的内容在DISCERN量表上的得分一直较高。尽管这些发现很有希望,但重要的是要注意局限性,比如由于非盲评分者的影响,在DISCERN评分中可能存在偏见,TikTok算法的影响,以及排除了带有
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
876
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine (OJSM), developed by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), is a global, peer-reviewed, open access journal that combines the interests of researchers and clinical practitioners across orthopaedic sports medicine, arthroscopy, and knee arthroplasty. Topics include original research in the areas of: -Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, including surgical and nonsurgical treatment of orthopaedic sports injuries -Arthroscopic Surgery (Shoulder/Elbow/Wrist/Hip/Knee/Ankle/Foot) -Relevant translational research -Sports traumatology/epidemiology -Knee and shoulder arthroplasty The OJSM also publishes relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书