The #Enzian Classification as a Predictor of Hormonal Therapy Response in Endometriosis-Associated Pain: A Retrospective Cohort Study in a Referral Center.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-11 DOI:10.1159/000550102
Sofia Gambigliani Zoccoli, Antonio La Marca, Martina Di Gianvito, Riccardo Cuoghi Costantini, Matilde Morini, Emma Bertucci, Carlo Alboni
{"title":"The #Enzian Classification as a Predictor of Hormonal Therapy Response in Endometriosis-Associated Pain: A Retrospective Cohort Study in a Referral Center.","authors":"Sofia Gambigliani Zoccoli, Antonio La Marca, Martina Di Gianvito, Riccardo Cuoghi Costantini, Matilde Morini, Emma Bertucci, Carlo Alboni","doi":"10.1159/000550102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study was to evaluate whether ultrasound-based #Enzian classification predicts pain profiles and response to hormonal therapy in patients with endometriosis. Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory disease affecting 10% of reproductive-age women, often causing debilitating pelvic pain. Although #Enzian is validated for surgical planning, its predictive role in medical therapy remains unexplored.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective cohort study, including 89 premenopausal patients referred between 2018 and 2023, was conducted. Hormonal therapies included progestin-only pills (dienogest - POP-D or other progestins - POP-O), combined estrogen-progestin pills (dienogest - EP-D or other EP-O), or norethisterone acetate. Pain was assessed via a 0-10 VAS at baseline, ≥3 months, and ≥6 months.</p><p><strong>Participants/materials, setting, methods: </strong>Patients had ultrasound-confirmed endometriosis and were hormone therapy-naïve for ≥6 months. Baseline evaluation included demographic data, reproductive history, prior surgeries, and six pain domains. #Enzian classification mapped lesion location and size (A: rectovaginal/vagina; B: uterosacral/parametria; C: rectum; FA: adenomyosis; FB: bladder; FU: ureter; FI: intestine above rectum; FO: extra pelvic; O: ovary; P: peritoneum; T: fallopian tubes/adhesions). Linear regression and linear mixed-effects models assessed associations between #Enzian compartments and pain trajectories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dysmenorrhea occurred in 86.5%, and dyspareunia occurred in 56.2%. Ovarian endometriomas (O) were present in 76.4%, deep infiltrating endometriosis (A, B, C) in 51.7%, and adenomyosis (FA) in 66.3%. POP-D was most effective in reducing ovulatory pain in ovarian (O), uterosacral/parametria (B), rectal (C), and tubal/adhesion (T) involvement, while EP-D was superior for dyspareunia in T. Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) remained refractory. Higher total #Enzian scores correlated with reduced therapy efficacy.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Retrospective design, single-center, small sample, use of aggregated pain scores, and incomplete follow-up may limit generalizability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ultrasound-based #Enzian classification correlates with lesion distribution and predicts hormonal therapy efficacy. POP-D therapy is superior at lower #Enzian scores; CPP remains challenging. Findings support individualized medical management and warrant prospective validation including multidimensional pain and quality-of-life assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":12952,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"505-511"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000550102","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate whether ultrasound-based #Enzian classification predicts pain profiles and response to hormonal therapy in patients with endometriosis. Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory disease affecting 10% of reproductive-age women, often causing debilitating pelvic pain. Although #Enzian is validated for surgical planning, its predictive role in medical therapy remains unexplored.

Design: A retrospective cohort study, including 89 premenopausal patients referred between 2018 and 2023, was conducted. Hormonal therapies included progestin-only pills (dienogest - POP-D or other progestins - POP-O), combined estrogen-progestin pills (dienogest - EP-D or other EP-O), or norethisterone acetate. Pain was assessed via a 0-10 VAS at baseline, ≥3 months, and ≥6 months.

Participants/materials, setting, methods: Patients had ultrasound-confirmed endometriosis and were hormone therapy-naïve for ≥6 months. Baseline evaluation included demographic data, reproductive history, prior surgeries, and six pain domains. #Enzian classification mapped lesion location and size (A: rectovaginal/vagina; B: uterosacral/parametria; C: rectum; FA: adenomyosis; FB: bladder; FU: ureter; FI: intestine above rectum; FO: extra pelvic; O: ovary; P: peritoneum; T: fallopian tubes/adhesions). Linear regression and linear mixed-effects models assessed associations between #Enzian compartments and pain trajectories.

Results: Dysmenorrhea occurred in 86.5%, and dyspareunia occurred in 56.2%. Ovarian endometriomas (O) were present in 76.4%, deep infiltrating endometriosis (A, B, C) in 51.7%, and adenomyosis (FA) in 66.3%. POP-D was most effective in reducing ovulatory pain in ovarian (O), uterosacral/parametria (B), rectal (C), and tubal/adhesion (T) involvement, while EP-D was superior for dyspareunia in T. Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) remained refractory. Higher total #Enzian scores correlated with reduced therapy efficacy.

Limitations: Retrospective design, single-center, small sample, use of aggregated pain scores, and incomplete follow-up may limit generalizability.

Conclusion: Ultrasound-based #Enzian classification correlates with lesion distribution and predicts hormonal therapy efficacy. POP-D therapy is superior at lower #Enzian scores; CPP remains challenging. Findings support individualized medical management and warrant prospective validation including multidimensional pain and quality-of-life assessments.

#Enzian分类作为子宫内膜异位症相关疼痛激素治疗反应的预测因子:转诊中心的回顾性队列研究
目的:评估基于超声的#Enzian分类是否能预测子宫内膜异位症患者的疼痛特征和对激素治疗的反应。子宫内膜异位症是一种慢性炎症性疾病,影响10%的育龄妇女,通常导致盆腔疼痛。虽然#Enzian已被证实可用于手术计划,但其在医学治疗中的预测作用仍未得到探索。设计:回顾性队列研究,纳入2018-2023年间转诊的89例绝经前患者。激素治疗包括黄体酮单药(Dienogest - POP-D或其他黄体酮- POP-O),雌激素-黄体酮联合药(Dienogest - EP-D或其他EP-O),或醋酸去甲睾酮(NETA)。在基线、≥3个月和≥6个月时,通过0-10 VAS评估疼痛。参与者/材料、环境、方法:超声确诊子宫内膜异位症患者,激素therapy-naïve≥6个月。基线评估包括人口统计数据、生育史、既往手术和6个疼痛域。#Enzian分类映射病变位置和大小(A:直肠阴道/阴道;B:子宫骶/参数;C:直肠;FA:子宫腺肌症;FB:膀胱;FU:输尿管;FI:直肠上方肠;FO:盆腔外;O:卵巢;P:腹膜;T:输卵管/粘连)。线性回归和线性混合效应模型评估了#Enzian隔室和疼痛轨迹之间的关联。结果:痛经占86.5%,性交困难占56.2%。卵巢子宫内膜异位瘤(O)占76.4%,DIE (A、B、C)占51.7%,子宫腺肌症(FA)占66.3%。POP-D在减轻卵巢(O)、子宫骶/参数(B)、直肠(C)和输卵管/粘连(T)受累的排卵疼痛方面最有效,而EP-D在减轻T受累的性交困难方面更有效。慢性盆腔疼痛仍然难治性。较高的#Enzian总分与较低的治疗效果相关。局限性:回顾性设计、单中心、小样本、使用汇总疼痛评分和不完全随访可能限制推广。结论:基于超声的#Enzian分型与病变分布相关,可预测激素治疗效果。在#Enzian评分较低的情况下,POP-D治疗效果更好;慢性盆腔疼痛仍然具有挑战性。研究结果支持个体化医疗管理,并保证包括多维疼痛和生活质量评估在内的前瞻性验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal covers the most active and promising areas of current research in gynecology and obstetrics. Invited, well-referenced reviews by noted experts keep readers in touch with the general framework and direction of international study. Original papers report selected experimental and clinical investigations in all fields related to gynecology, obstetrics and reproduction. Short communications are published to allow immediate discussion of new data. The international and interdisciplinary character of this periodical provides an avenue to less accessible sources and to worldwide research for investigators and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书