Enhanced Recovery After Lumbar Fusion Surgery: An International Survey on Current Practice.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Global Spine Journal Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-12 DOI:10.1177/21925682261434216
Hein R Jonkman, Floris R van Tol, Tim M Govers, Silje A C A Debets, Thomas W Wainwright, Bertrand Debono, Michael M H Yang, Hans D de Boer, Maroeska M Rovers, Jorrit-Jan Verlaan
{"title":"Enhanced Recovery After Lumbar Fusion Surgery: An International Survey on Current Practice.","authors":"Hein R Jonkman, Floris R van Tol, Tim M Govers, Silje A C A Debets, Thomas W Wainwright, Bertrand Debono, Michael M H Yang, Hans D de Boer, Maroeska M Rovers, Jorrit-Jan Verlaan","doi":"10.1177/21925682261434216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Study DesignCross-sectional, web-based international survey study.ObjectivesTo assess spine surgeons' perspectives on the importance of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) components and barriers to implementing ERAS programs in degenerative lumbar fusion.MethodsIn May 2024, a web-based survey was distributed to AOSpine members. The survey covered eight ERAS components derived from the 2021 consensus statement for perioperative care in lumbar fusion. Respondents selected up to three components with the biggest perceived impact on recovery and up to three with the greatest room for improvement. Responses were summarized in a priority matrix. Demographics, perceived barriers, and implementation support needs were analyzed using descriptive statistics.ResultsThe survey was accessed by 400 individuals, yielding 322 responses (80.5%) and a 76.7% completion rate. Respondents represented academic (50.6%), private (28.9%), and local/community hospitals (20.5%) worldwide. ERAS components perceived to have the biggest impact on recovery were multimodal opioid-sparing analgesia (73.3%), early mobilization (63.8%), and preoperative education & counselling (58.6%), which were also identified as having the greatest room for improvement (39.4%, 41.4%, and 62.6%, respectively). Key barriers were the absence of clear protocols and guidelines (56.2%), staff shortages (53.8%), and difficulties coordinating implementation and adherence (43.0%).ConclusionMultimodal opioid-sparing analgesia, early mobilization, and preoperative education & counselling were identified as ERAS components with the biggest perceived impact on patient recovery and the greatest room for improvement. Targeted efforts in these domains may represent an important opportunity to enhance perioperative care and support the implementation of ERAS programs in lumbar spinal fusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"3369-3378"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12982138/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682261434216","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study DesignCross-sectional, web-based international survey study.ObjectivesTo assess spine surgeons' perspectives on the importance of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) components and barriers to implementing ERAS programs in degenerative lumbar fusion.MethodsIn May 2024, a web-based survey was distributed to AOSpine members. The survey covered eight ERAS components derived from the 2021 consensus statement for perioperative care in lumbar fusion. Respondents selected up to three components with the biggest perceived impact on recovery and up to three with the greatest room for improvement. Responses were summarized in a priority matrix. Demographics, perceived barriers, and implementation support needs were analyzed using descriptive statistics.ResultsThe survey was accessed by 400 individuals, yielding 322 responses (80.5%) and a 76.7% completion rate. Respondents represented academic (50.6%), private (28.9%), and local/community hospitals (20.5%) worldwide. ERAS components perceived to have the biggest impact on recovery were multimodal opioid-sparing analgesia (73.3%), early mobilization (63.8%), and preoperative education & counselling (58.6%), which were also identified as having the greatest room for improvement (39.4%, 41.4%, and 62.6%, respectively). Key barriers were the absence of clear protocols and guidelines (56.2%), staff shortages (53.8%), and difficulties coordinating implementation and adherence (43.0%).ConclusionMultimodal opioid-sparing analgesia, early mobilization, and preoperative education & counselling were identified as ERAS components with the biggest perceived impact on patient recovery and the greatest room for improvement. Targeted efforts in these domains may represent an important opportunity to enhance perioperative care and support the implementation of ERAS programs in lumbar spinal fusion.

腰椎融合术后增强恢复:一项当前国际实践调查。
研究设计横断面、基于网络的国际调查研究。目的评估脊柱外科医生对增强术后恢复(ERAS)组件的重要性和在退行性腰椎融合术中实施ERAS计划的障碍的看法。方法2024年5月,对AOSpine会员进行网络调查。该调查涵盖了来自2021年腰椎融合术围手术期护理共识声明的八个ERAS组件。受访者最多选择三个对复苏影响最大的组成部分,最多选择三个改善空间最大的组成部分。反应总结在一个优先矩阵中。使用描述性统计分析了人口统计学、感知障碍和实施支持需求。结果400人参与调查,回复322人(80.5%),完成率76.7%。受访者来自全球的学术医院(50.6%)、私立医院(28.9%)和地方/社区医院(20.5%)。ERAS组件被认为对恢复影响最大的是多模式阿片类镇痛(73.3%),早期动员(63.8%)和术前教育和咨询(58.6%),这些组件也被认为具有最大的改进空间(分别为39.4%,41.4%和62.6%)。主要障碍是缺乏明确的方案和指南(56.2%)、人员短缺(53.8%)和难以协调实施和遵守(43.0%)。结论多模式阿片保留镇痛、早期活动和术前教育咨询是ERAS中对患者康复影响最大、改善空间最大的组成部分。这些领域的针对性努力可能是加强围手术期护理和支持ERAS项目在腰椎融合术中实施的重要机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书