Definitions of early COPD and predictors for disease progression: a systematic review.

IF 10.8 1区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
European Respiratory Review Pub Date : 2026-03-11 Print Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1183/16000617.0182-2025
Alastair Watson, Ross Davidson, Fu Chuen Kon, Arnav Sharma, Gbenga Adesoye, Bryan Chang, Kane Alexander, Mosea Song, Isobel Soper, Akhilesh Jha, Marie Fisk
{"title":"Definitions of early COPD and predictors for disease progression: a systematic review.","authors":"Alastair Watson, Ross Davidson, Fu Chuen Kon, Arnav Sharma, Gbenga Adesoye, Bryan Chang, Kane Alexander, Mosea Song, Isobel Soper, Akhilesh Jha, Marie Fisk","doi":"10.1183/16000617.0182-2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Early chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is considered to represent the initial phase of the disease. However, inconsistent terminology and lack of standardised definitions hinders research and clinical application. This systematic review examined clinical research on early COPD, analysed terms and definitions used, and evaluated predictors of disease progression. This serves as a platform to reach consensus and direct future research to target early disease states and improve patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Utilising a standardised protocol, we systematically screened all clinical studies on early COPD. Titles and abstracts were reviewed and compared against inclusion and exclusion criteria. Stage 1 assessed terminology and definitions and stage 2 evaluated predictors of progression. Two independent people reviewed studies at each stage. Study quality was appraised using a modified Downs and Black checklist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 4871 articles, 1759 were screened after duplicate removal. The terms used included PRISm (preserved ratio impaired spirometry) (104 articles), GOLD 0 (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease stage 0) (63), early COPD (37), at-risk COPD (35) and pre-COPD (30). Definitions were heterogeneous and proposed early COPD definitions were not routinely used. Stage 2 included 43 full-text articles from cohort studies, of which 93% were of good quality. Predictors of progression included age (n=13 articles), smoking history (12), symptoms (12), exacerbations (one), lung function measures (20), computed tomography metrics (14), risk tools (three) and machine learning approaches (three).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We demonstrate an urgent need for consensus on clinically applicable definitions of the early disease course of COPD, prior to diagnosis. We highlight predictors of progression; these need validation to enable stratification of individuals early in their disease trajectory for targeted management to halt or modify progression.</p>","PeriodicalId":12166,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Review","volume":"35 179","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12976884/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Respiratory Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0182-2025","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Early chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is considered to represent the initial phase of the disease. However, inconsistent terminology and lack of standardised definitions hinders research and clinical application. This systematic review examined clinical research on early COPD, analysed terms and definitions used, and evaluated predictors of disease progression. This serves as a platform to reach consensus and direct future research to target early disease states and improve patient outcomes.

Methods: Utilising a standardised protocol, we systematically screened all clinical studies on early COPD. Titles and abstracts were reviewed and compared against inclusion and exclusion criteria. Stage 1 assessed terminology and definitions and stage 2 evaluated predictors of progression. Two independent people reviewed studies at each stage. Study quality was appraised using a modified Downs and Black checklist.

Results: We identified 4871 articles, 1759 were screened after duplicate removal. The terms used included PRISm (preserved ratio impaired spirometry) (104 articles), GOLD 0 (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease stage 0) (63), early COPD (37), at-risk COPD (35) and pre-COPD (30). Definitions were heterogeneous and proposed early COPD definitions were not routinely used. Stage 2 included 43 full-text articles from cohort studies, of which 93% were of good quality. Predictors of progression included age (n=13 articles), smoking history (12), symptoms (12), exacerbations (one), lung function measures (20), computed tomography metrics (14), risk tools (three) and machine learning approaches (three).

Conclusion: We demonstrate an urgent need for consensus on clinically applicable definitions of the early disease course of COPD, prior to diagnosis. We highlight predictors of progression; these need validation to enable stratification of individuals early in their disease trajectory for targeted management to halt or modify progression.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

早期COPD的定义和疾病进展的预测因素:一项系统综述。
早期慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)被认为代表疾病的初始阶段。然而,不一致的术语和缺乏标准化的定义阻碍了研究和临床应用。本系统综述检查了早期COPD的临床研究,分析了使用的术语和定义,并评估了疾病进展的预测因素。这可以作为达成共识和指导未来研究的平台,以针对早期疾病状态并改善患者预后。方法:采用标准化方案,系统筛选所有早期COPD的临床研究。对标题和摘要进行审查,并根据纳入和排除标准进行比较。第一阶段评估术语和定义,第二阶段评估进展的预测因素。两个独立的人在每个阶段审查研究。采用改进的Downs和Black检查表对研究质量进行评估。结果:共筛选出4871篇文献,去除重复后筛选出1759篇。使用的术语包括PRISm(保存比例受损肺活量测定法)(104篇)、GOLD 0(慢性阻塞性肺疾病全球倡议0期)(63篇)、早期COPD(37篇)、高危COPD(35篇)和COPD前期(30篇)。定义是异构的,提出的早期COPD定义没有常规使用。第二阶段纳入43篇来自队列研究的全文文章,其中93%质量良好。病情进展的预测因素包括年龄(n=13篇)、吸烟史(12篇)、症状(12篇)、恶化(1篇)、肺功能测量(20篇)、计算机断层扫描指标(14篇)、风险工具(3篇)和机器学习方法(3篇)。结论:我们证明迫切需要在诊断之前就COPD早期病程的临床适用定义达成共识。我们强调进展的预测因素;这些需要验证,以便在疾病早期对个体进行分层,进行有针对性的管理,以阻止或改变疾病进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Respiratory Review
European Respiratory Review Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
1.30%
发文量
91
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Respiratory Review (ERR) is an open-access journal published by the European Respiratory Society (ERS), serving as a vital resource for respiratory professionals by delivering updates on medicine, science, and surgery in the field. ERR features state-of-the-art review articles, editorials, correspondence, and summaries of recent research findings and studies covering a wide range of topics including COPD, asthma, pulmonary hypertension, interstitial lung disease, lung cancer, tuberculosis, and pulmonary infections. Articles are published continuously and compiled into quarterly issues within a single annual volume.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书