Amyloid PET quantification with deep learning segmentation models without MRI.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Sheng-Chieh Chiu, Yun-Chi Lin, Jonathan McConathy, Sheng-Yu Lin, Yu-Hua Dean Fang
{"title":"Amyloid PET quantification with deep learning segmentation models without MRI.","authors":"Sheng-Chieh Chiu, Yun-Chi Lin, Jonathan McConathy, Sheng-Yu Lin, Yu-Hua Dean Fang","doi":"10.1186/s40658-026-00854-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PURPOSE: To develop and validate deep learning (DL) segmentation models for accurate, MRI-less amyloid PET quantification through the Centiloid scale. METHODS: In this retrospective study, two DL models (PET/CT and PET-only) were trained using 2774 18F-FBP PET/MRI scan pairs from the ADNI dataset, where synthetic CT were generated from T1w MRI and used as training data. External validation was performed on 424 PET/CT scans from the OASIS-3 dataset. The performance of the DL models was compared to the MRI-based FreeSurfer reference method and the template-based rPOP method. Statistical analyses included the calculation of mean absolute error (MAE), R-squared (R²), equivalence testing, and diagnostic accuracy for amyloid positivity (Centiloid > 20), with a focus on the 0–40 Centiloid ‘gray zone’. RESULTS: The PET/CT model demonstrated the highest accuracy, with a MAE of 5.79 Centiloid and a strong correlation (R² = 0.96). The PET-only and rPOP methods showed higher errors with MAEs of 10.8 and 14.45 Centiloid, respectively. The PET/CT model’s Centiloid values were shown to be equivalent to the MRI-derived values within a ± 5 margin, while the PET-only and rPOP methods were not. In the Centiloid gray zone subgroup (n = 93), the PET/CT model yielded the highest diagnostic accuracy of 90.3% and agreement (Cohen’s kappa = 0.79). CONCLUSION: DL models, particularly the PET/CT model trained with synthetic CT, provide accurate and robust Centiloid quantification for 18F-FBP amyloid PET, suggesting their potential as a tool for MRI-less amyloid PET quantification. </p>","PeriodicalId":11559,"journal":{"name":"EJNMMI Physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13090444/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJNMMI Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-026-00854-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop and validate deep learning (DL) segmentation models for accurate, MRI-less amyloid PET quantification through the Centiloid scale. METHODS: In this retrospective study, two DL models (PET/CT and PET-only) were trained using 2774 18F-FBP PET/MRI scan pairs from the ADNI dataset, where synthetic CT were generated from T1w MRI and used as training data. External validation was performed on 424 PET/CT scans from the OASIS-3 dataset. The performance of the DL models was compared to the MRI-based FreeSurfer reference method and the template-based rPOP method. Statistical analyses included the calculation of mean absolute error (MAE), R-squared (R²), equivalence testing, and diagnostic accuracy for amyloid positivity (Centiloid > 20), with a focus on the 0–40 Centiloid ‘gray zone’. RESULTS: The PET/CT model demonstrated the highest accuracy, with a MAE of 5.79 Centiloid and a strong correlation (R² = 0.96). The PET-only and rPOP methods showed higher errors with MAEs of 10.8 and 14.45 Centiloid, respectively. The PET/CT model’s Centiloid values were shown to be equivalent to the MRI-derived values within a ± 5 margin, while the PET-only and rPOP methods were not. In the Centiloid gray zone subgroup (n = 93), the PET/CT model yielded the highest diagnostic accuracy of 90.3% and agreement (Cohen’s kappa = 0.79). CONCLUSION: DL models, particularly the PET/CT model trained with synthetic CT, provide accurate and robust Centiloid quantification for 18F-FBP amyloid PET, suggesting their potential as a tool for MRI-less amyloid PET quantification.

无MRI的深度学习分割模型淀粉样蛋白PET定量。
目的:开发和验证深度学习(DL)分割模型,通过Centiloid量表进行准确的,mri较少的淀粉样蛋白PET定量。方法:在这项回顾性研究中,使用来自ADNI数据集的2774对18F-FBP PET/MRI扫描对训练两个DL模型(PET/CT和PET-only),其中合成CT由T1w MRI生成并用作训练数据。对来自OASIS-3数据集的424个PET/CT扫描进行外部验证。将DL模型的性能与基于mri的FreeSurfer参考方法和基于模板的rPOP方法进行了比较。统计分析包括计算平均绝对误差(MAE)、R平方(R²)、等效检验和淀粉样蛋白阳性的诊断准确性(Centiloid bbb20),重点关注0-40 Centiloid“灰色地带”。结果:PET/CT模型准确率最高,MAE为5.79厘体,相关性强(R²= 0.96)。PET-only法和rPOP法误差较大,MAEs分别为10.8和14.45厘体。PET/CT模型的Centiloid值与mri衍生值在±5的范围内相当,而PET-only和rPOP方法则不然。在Centiloid灰色区亚组(n = 93)中,PET/CT模型的诊断准确率最高,为90.3%,一致性最高(Cohen’s kappa = 0.79)。结论:DL模型,特别是经过合成CT训练的PET/CT模型,可以为18F-FBP淀粉样PET提供准确、可靠的Centiloid定量,这表明它们有潜力成为MRI-less淀粉样PET定量的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
EJNMMI Physics
EJNMMI Physics Physics and Astronomy-Radiation
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
78
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: EJNMMI Physics is an international platform for scientists, users and adopters of nuclear medicine with a particular interest in physics matters. As a companion journal to the European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, this journal has a multi-disciplinary approach and welcomes original materials and studies with a focus on applied physics and mathematics as well as imaging systems engineering and prototyping in nuclear medicine. This includes physics-driven approaches or algorithms supported by physics that foster early clinical adoption of nuclear medicine imaging and therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书