Sheng-Chieh Chiu, Yun-Chi Lin, Jonathan McConathy, Sheng-Yu Lin, Yu-Hua Dean Fang
{"title":"Amyloid PET quantification with deep learning segmentation models without MRI.","authors":"Sheng-Chieh Chiu, Yun-Chi Lin, Jonathan McConathy, Sheng-Yu Lin, Yu-Hua Dean Fang","doi":"10.1186/s40658-026-00854-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PURPOSE: To develop and validate deep learning (DL) segmentation models for accurate, MRI-less amyloid PET quantification through the Centiloid scale. METHODS: In this retrospective study, two DL models (PET/CT and PET-only) were trained using 2774 18F-FBP PET/MRI scan pairs from the ADNI dataset, where synthetic CT were generated from T1w MRI and used as training data. External validation was performed on 424 PET/CT scans from the OASIS-3 dataset. The performance of the DL models was compared to the MRI-based FreeSurfer reference method and the template-based rPOP method. Statistical analyses included the calculation of mean absolute error (MAE), R-squared (R²), equivalence testing, and diagnostic accuracy for amyloid positivity (Centiloid > 20), with a focus on the 0–40 Centiloid ‘gray zone’. RESULTS: The PET/CT model demonstrated the highest accuracy, with a MAE of 5.79 Centiloid and a strong correlation (R² = 0.96). The PET-only and rPOP methods showed higher errors with MAEs of 10.8 and 14.45 Centiloid, respectively. The PET/CT model’s Centiloid values were shown to be equivalent to the MRI-derived values within a ± 5 margin, while the PET-only and rPOP methods were not. In the Centiloid gray zone subgroup (n = 93), the PET/CT model yielded the highest diagnostic accuracy of 90.3% and agreement (Cohen’s kappa = 0.79). CONCLUSION: DL models, particularly the PET/CT model trained with synthetic CT, provide accurate and robust Centiloid quantification for 18F-FBP amyloid PET, suggesting their potential as a tool for MRI-less amyloid PET quantification. </p>","PeriodicalId":11559,"journal":{"name":"EJNMMI Physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13090444/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJNMMI Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-026-00854-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
PURPOSE: To develop and validate deep learning (DL) segmentation models for accurate, MRI-less amyloid PET quantification through the Centiloid scale. METHODS: In this retrospective study, two DL models (PET/CT and PET-only) were trained using 2774 18F-FBP PET/MRI scan pairs from the ADNI dataset, where synthetic CT were generated from T1w MRI and used as training data. External validation was performed on 424 PET/CT scans from the OASIS-3 dataset. The performance of the DL models was compared to the MRI-based FreeSurfer reference method and the template-based rPOP method. Statistical analyses included the calculation of mean absolute error (MAE), R-squared (R²), equivalence testing, and diagnostic accuracy for amyloid positivity (Centiloid > 20), with a focus on the 0–40 Centiloid ‘gray zone’. RESULTS: The PET/CT model demonstrated the highest accuracy, with a MAE of 5.79 Centiloid and a strong correlation (R² = 0.96). The PET-only and rPOP methods showed higher errors with MAEs of 10.8 and 14.45 Centiloid, respectively. The PET/CT model’s Centiloid values were shown to be equivalent to the MRI-derived values within a ± 5 margin, while the PET-only and rPOP methods were not. In the Centiloid gray zone subgroup (n = 93), the PET/CT model yielded the highest diagnostic accuracy of 90.3% and agreement (Cohen’s kappa = 0.79). CONCLUSION: DL models, particularly the PET/CT model trained with synthetic CT, provide accurate and robust Centiloid quantification for 18F-FBP amyloid PET, suggesting their potential as a tool for MRI-less amyloid PET quantification.
期刊介绍:
EJNMMI Physics is an international platform for scientists, users and adopters of nuclear medicine with a particular interest in physics matters. As a companion journal to the European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, this journal has a multi-disciplinary approach and welcomes original materials and studies with a focus on applied physics and mathematics as well as imaging systems engineering and prototyping in nuclear medicine. This includes physics-driven approaches or algorithms supported by physics that foster early clinical adoption of nuclear medicine imaging and therapy.