Association between Neonatal Hypoglycemia and 30-Day Breastfeeding Outcomes among Gravidas with Type 2 Diabetes.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
American journal of perinatology Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-10 DOI:10.1055/a-2827-0515
Daniella Rogerson, Marni Jacobs, Minhazur Sarker, Kim Boggess, Ashley N Battarbee, Jerrie Refuerzo, Noelia Zork, Gayle Olson, Celeste Durnwald, Kjersti Aagaard, Kedra Wallace, Christina Scifres, Todd Rosen, Sherri Longo, Gladys A Ramos
{"title":"Association between Neonatal Hypoglycemia and 30-Day Breastfeeding Outcomes among Gravidas with Type 2 Diabetes.","authors":"Daniella Rogerson, Marni Jacobs, Minhazur Sarker, Kim Boggess, Ashley N Battarbee, Jerrie Refuerzo, Noelia Zork, Gayle Olson, Celeste Durnwald, Kjersti Aagaard, Kedra Wallace, Christina Scifres, Todd Rosen, Sherri Longo, Gladys A Ramos","doi":"10.1055/a-2827-0515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Pregestational diabetes is associated with low prevalence of breastfeeding due to low rates of intent, delayed lactogenesis, and early infant separation. It is hypothesized that the perceived need for formula supplementation due to neonatal hypoglycemia, coupled with maternal low early milk supply, is a barrier to breastfeeding initiation. Whether there is an association between neonatal hypoglycemia and breastfeeding is unknown. We evaluated associations between neonatal hypoglycemia and breastfeeding.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This is a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial of metformin versus placebo plus insulin in participants with type 2 diabetes. We included participants who delivered a liveborn neonate, endorsed intention to breastfeed, and had neonatal hypoglycemia data available. A breastfeeding questionnaire was administered at 30-day postpartum, and outcomes were compared between neonates with and without hypoglycemia. The primary outcome was prevalence of exclusive, partial, or no breastfeeding at 30-day postpartum. Secondary outcomes included time to breastfeeding cessation and contributing factors. Characteristics were compared with chi-square, <i>t</i>-tests, or Wilcoxon tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 420 participants in the primary study (53%) completed an antepartum survey, including a question about intent to breastfeed. After exclusion criteria were applied, 370 (91%) of 405 possible participants reported intention to breastfeed. Among these 370 who met criteria and had intention to breastfeed, 265 (72%) responded to the 30-day postpartum questionnaire. Of these 265, 114 (43%) had neonatal hypoglycemia and 151 (57.0%) did not. Prevalence of not breastfeeding (35 vs. 37%), exclusive breastfeeding (18 vs. 13%), and partial breastfeeding (47 vs. 50%) did not differ between neonates with and without hypoglycemia (<i>p</i> = 0.51). This persisted in a neonatal intensive care unit-admitted subgroup (<i>p</i> = 0.29). Participants who stopped breastfeeding did so on average at 2.6 to 2.8 weeks (<i>p</i> = 0.76).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found no impact of neonatal hypoglycemia on 30-day postpartum breastfeeding prevalence among participants with diabetes.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>· Type 2 diabetes reduces the likelihood of breastfeeding, and the barriers are not fully known.. · Neonatal hypoglycemia is hypothesized to be one barrier to breastfeeding among this population.. · Neonatal hypoglycemia did not impact breastfeeding among diabetic gravidas 30-day postpartum.. · This remained true among neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit.. · Further research examining barriers to breastfeeding among gravidas with diabetes is needed..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":"1780-1785"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13091607/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2827-0515","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Pregestational diabetes is associated with low prevalence of breastfeeding due to low rates of intent, delayed lactogenesis, and early infant separation. It is hypothesized that the perceived need for formula supplementation due to neonatal hypoglycemia, coupled with maternal low early milk supply, is a barrier to breastfeeding initiation. Whether there is an association between neonatal hypoglycemia and breastfeeding is unknown. We evaluated associations between neonatal hypoglycemia and breastfeeding.

Study design: This is a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial of metformin versus placebo plus insulin in participants with type 2 diabetes. We included participants who delivered a liveborn neonate, endorsed intention to breastfeed, and had neonatal hypoglycemia data available. A breastfeeding questionnaire was administered at 30-day postpartum, and outcomes were compared between neonates with and without hypoglycemia. The primary outcome was prevalence of exclusive, partial, or no breastfeeding at 30-day postpartum. Secondary outcomes included time to breastfeeding cessation and contributing factors. Characteristics were compared with chi-square, t-tests, or Wilcoxon tests.

Results: A total of 420 participants in the primary study (53%) completed an antepartum survey, including a question about intent to breastfeed. After exclusion criteria were applied, 370 (91%) of 405 possible participants reported intention to breastfeed. Among these 370 who met criteria and had intention to breastfeed, 265 (72%) responded to the 30-day postpartum questionnaire. Of these 265, 114 (43%) had neonatal hypoglycemia and 151 (57.0%) did not. Prevalence of not breastfeeding (35 vs. 37%), exclusive breastfeeding (18 vs. 13%), and partial breastfeeding (47 vs. 50%) did not differ between neonates with and without hypoglycemia (p = 0.51). This persisted in a neonatal intensive care unit-admitted subgroup (p = 0.29). Participants who stopped breastfeeding did so on average at 2.6 to 2.8 weeks (p = 0.76).

Conclusion: This study found no impact of neonatal hypoglycemia on 30-day postpartum breastfeeding prevalence among participants with diabetes.

Key points: · Type 2 diabetes reduces the likelihood of breastfeeding, and the barriers are not fully known.. · Neonatal hypoglycemia is hypothesized to be one barrier to breastfeeding among this population.. · Neonatal hypoglycemia did not impact breastfeeding among diabetic gravidas 30-day postpartum.. · This remained true among neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit.. · Further research examining barriers to breastfeeding among gravidas with diabetes is needed..

2型糖尿病孕妇新生儿低血糖与30天母乳喂养结局的关系
研究背景:妊娠期糖尿病与低母乳喂养率有关,原因是低母乳喂养率、延迟乳发生和婴儿早期分离。据推测,由于新生儿低血糖,加上母亲早期母乳供应不足,对配方奶粉补充的感知需求是母乳喂养开始的障碍。新生儿低血糖与母乳喂养之间是否存在关联尚不清楚。我们评估了新生儿低血糖和母乳喂养之间的关系。方法:本研究是对二甲双胍与安慰剂加胰岛素在2型糖尿病患者中的随机对照试验的二次分析。我们纳入了分娩活产新生儿、认可母乳喂养意向并有新生儿低血糖数据的参与者。在产后30天进行母乳喂养问卷调查,并比较有和没有低血糖的新生儿的结果。主要结果是产后30天纯母乳喂养、部分母乳喂养或不母乳喂养的发生率。次要结果包括停止母乳喂养的时间和影响因素。特征比较采用卡方检验、t检验或Wilcoxon检验。结果在最初的研究中,有420名参与者(53%)完成了产前调查,包括一个关于母乳喂养意图的问题。应用排除标准后,405名可能参与者中有370名(91%)报告有意母乳喂养。在这370名符合标准并有意母乳喂养的妇女中,265名(72%)回答了产后30天的问卷调查。在这265例中,114例(43%)有新生儿低血糖,151例(57.0%)没有。不母乳喂养(35%对37%)、纯母乳喂养(18%对13%)和部分母乳喂养(47%对50%)的患病率在有和没有低血糖的新生儿之间没有差异(p = 0.51)。这种情况在NICU住院亚组中仍然存在(p = 0.29)。停止母乳喂养的参与者平均在2.6-2.8周停止母乳喂养(p = 0.76)。结论:本研究未发现新生儿低血糖对糖尿病患者产后30天母乳喂养患病率有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书