Expropriation and Refusal: Black Tenants, Racial Capitalism, and the Struggle for Home at Chalkfarm Drive

IF 3.5 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Geoforum Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-03 DOI:10.1016/j.geoforum.2026.104557
Nemoy K. Lewis, Dimitri Panou
{"title":"Expropriation and Refusal: Black Tenants, Racial Capitalism, and the Struggle for Home at Chalkfarm Drive","authors":"Nemoy K. Lewis,&nbsp;Dimitri Panou","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2026.104557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In Canada’s financialized rental housing landscape, the experiences of Black tenants remain obscured by aggregate metrics and sanitized policy discourse. This paper addresses that erasure through a case study of four apartment buildings on Chalkfarm Drive in Toronto’s northwest—properties owned and managed by Greenwin Inc.— where Nigerian newcomers and other renters from the African diaspora have faced systematic eviction threats, infrastructural neglect, and racialized abuse. Drawing on qualitative interviews with current and former tenants, the study illustrates how eviction filings, predatory post-tenancy billing, and chronic disrepair operate as technologies of extraction, targeting the structural precarity of Black migrant households. Tenants report receiving invoices of several thousand dollars for alleged “damages” after vacating their units, irrespective of unit conditions as they expereinced them. These practices point to racialized expropriation enabled by persistent enforcement gaps and institutional contraints in municipal property standards enforcement, alongside a regulatory environment that routinely proves insufficient to deter chronic disrepair and post-tenancy extraction. Rather than isolated examples of mismanagement, these harms reflect a racial capitalist housing order in which disposability is spatialized, normalized, and profitable. Yet within this terrain of abandonment and racialized control, tenants engage in everyday practices of care, refusal, and collective survival that contest their manufactured vulnerability. Their resistance articulates a Black praxis of being that defies the logics of extraction and property and asserts a right to remain rooted in diasporic belonging and spatial justice. By centring these voices, this study contributes to critical debates on eviction, racial capitalism, and housing justice, and calls for abolitionist frameworks that dismantle landlord power while building pathways toward collective ownership and tenant self-determination.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"170 ","pages":"Article 104557"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718526000254","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Canada’s financialized rental housing landscape, the experiences of Black tenants remain obscured by aggregate metrics and sanitized policy discourse. This paper addresses that erasure through a case study of four apartment buildings on Chalkfarm Drive in Toronto’s northwest—properties owned and managed by Greenwin Inc.— where Nigerian newcomers and other renters from the African diaspora have faced systematic eviction threats, infrastructural neglect, and racialized abuse. Drawing on qualitative interviews with current and former tenants, the study illustrates how eviction filings, predatory post-tenancy billing, and chronic disrepair operate as technologies of extraction, targeting the structural precarity of Black migrant households. Tenants report receiving invoices of several thousand dollars for alleged “damages” after vacating their units, irrespective of unit conditions as they expereinced them. These practices point to racialized expropriation enabled by persistent enforcement gaps and institutional contraints in municipal property standards enforcement, alongside a regulatory environment that routinely proves insufficient to deter chronic disrepair and post-tenancy extraction. Rather than isolated examples of mismanagement, these harms reflect a racial capitalist housing order in which disposability is spatialized, normalized, and profitable. Yet within this terrain of abandonment and racialized control, tenants engage in everyday practices of care, refusal, and collective survival that contest their manufactured vulnerability. Their resistance articulates a Black praxis of being that defies the logics of extraction and property and asserts a right to remain rooted in diasporic belonging and spatial justice. By centring these voices, this study contributes to critical debates on eviction, racial capitalism, and housing justice, and calls for abolitionist frameworks that dismantle landlord power while building pathways toward collective ownership and tenant self-determination.
征用与拒绝:黑人佃户,种族资本主义,以及在粉笔农场路为家园而斗争
在加拿大金融化的租赁住房格局中,黑人租户的经历仍然被总体指标和净化的政策话语所掩盖。本文通过对多伦多西北部Chalkfarm大道上的四栋公寓楼的案例研究来解决这种消除问题,这些公寓楼由Greenwin Inc.拥有和管理。在这些公寓楼中,尼日利亚新来者和其他来自非洲侨民的租房者面临着系统性的驱逐威胁、基础设施被忽视和种族歧视。通过对现任和前任租户的定性访谈,该研究说明了驱逐文件、掠夺性租后账单和长期失修是如何作为提取技术运作的,目标是黑人移民家庭的结构性不稳定性。租户报告说,他们在搬离公寓后,不管公寓的情况如何,都会收到数千美元的所谓“损害赔偿”发票。这些做法表明,由于持续的执法差距和市政财产标准执行中的制度限制,以及通常被证明不足以阻止长期失修和租后提取的监管环境,导致了种族化的征用。这些危害不是管理不善的孤立例子,而是反映了一种种族资本主义住房秩序,在这种秩序中,一次性住房被空间化、规范化和有利可图。然而,在这种被遗弃和种族化控制的情况下,租户们每天都在关心、拒绝和集体生存,挑战他们被制造出来的脆弱性。他们的反抗表达了一种黑人的存在实践,这种实践蔑视榨取和财产的逻辑,并主张保留植根于散居的归属感和空间正义的权利。通过集中这些声音,本研究有助于对驱逐,种族资本主义和住房正义的批判性辩论,并呼吁废除地主权力的废除主义框架,同时建立通往集体所有权和租户自决的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geoforum
Geoforum GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
201
期刊介绍: Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书