Labor, power and scale: an analysis of food policy councils and food labor advocacy in the United States

IF 3.5 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Geoforum Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-03 DOI:10.1016/j.geoforum.2026.104561
Laura-Anne Minkoff-Zern , Jonnell A. Robinson , Frank Sarfo
{"title":"Labor, power and scale: an analysis of food policy councils and food labor advocacy in the United States","authors":"Laura-Anne Minkoff-Zern ,&nbsp;Jonnell A. Robinson ,&nbsp;Frank Sarfo","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2026.104561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In this study, we focus on U.S.-based Food Policy Councils (FPCs), diverse networks of food system representatives that work regionally across sectors. We examine how these groups’ focus on regional scale can be both a challenge and an opportunity for prioritizing food system labor. Contrary to research in geography and other food system scholarship, which critiques locally focused market-based food movements for attending to the interests of well-resourced consumers and ignoring labor injustices and inequalities, this paper argues that FPCs are finding ways to contribute to social movements and policy change regarding food workers’ rights on a regional scale. Drawing on national survey data, focus groups, and interviews with FPC leaders, we conclude that FPCs have the potential to improve food labor conditions, particularly through their support of values-based procurement policies. By applying a food systems lens to concerns that are relevant to both workers and employers at the local and regional scales, some FPCs are bringing awareness to the conditions of food workers. While these approaches do not alleviate structural constraints to increasing low wages, nor power differentials between workers and owners, they highlight the value of place-based food labor advocacy and provide openings for rethinking critiques concerning regional and local food movements.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"170 ","pages":"Article 104561"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718526000291","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we focus on U.S.-based Food Policy Councils (FPCs), diverse networks of food system representatives that work regionally across sectors. We examine how these groups’ focus on regional scale can be both a challenge and an opportunity for prioritizing food system labor. Contrary to research in geography and other food system scholarship, which critiques locally focused market-based food movements for attending to the interests of well-resourced consumers and ignoring labor injustices and inequalities, this paper argues that FPCs are finding ways to contribute to social movements and policy change regarding food workers’ rights on a regional scale. Drawing on national survey data, focus groups, and interviews with FPC leaders, we conclude that FPCs have the potential to improve food labor conditions, particularly through their support of values-based procurement policies. By applying a food systems lens to concerns that are relevant to both workers and employers at the local and regional scales, some FPCs are bringing awareness to the conditions of food workers. While these approaches do not alleviate structural constraints to increasing low wages, nor power differentials between workers and owners, they highlight the value of place-based food labor advocacy and provide openings for rethinking critiques concerning regional and local food movements.
劳工、权力和规模:美国食品政策委员会和食品劳工倡导的分析
在本研究中,我们将重点放在美国的食品政策委员会(FPCs)上,这是一种跨区域跨部门工作的食品系统代表的多样化网络。我们研究了这些群体对区域规模的关注如何既是挑战,也是优先考虑粮食系统劳动力的机会。与地理学和其他食品系统学术研究相反,这些研究批评以当地为中心的以市场为基础的食品运动关注资源丰富的消费者的利益,忽视劳工的不公正和不平等,本文认为,fpc正在寻找方法,为区域范围内食品工人权利的社会运动和政策变化做出贡献。根据全国调查数据、焦点小组和对FPC领导人的采访,我们得出结论,FPC具有改善食品劳动条件的潜力,特别是通过他们对基于价值的采购政策的支持。通过将食品系统的视角应用于与当地和区域规模的工人和雇主相关的问题,一些食品保障中心正在提高对食品工人状况的认识。虽然这些方法不能缓解低工资增长的结构性限制,也不能缓解工人和业主之间的权力差异,但它们突出了基于地方的食品劳工倡导的价值,并为重新思考有关区域和地方食品运动的批评提供了机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geoforum
Geoforum GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
201
期刊介绍: Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书