Meiriele Alvarenga Cumplido , André Rodrigues Gonçalves , Fernando Ramos Martins , Paula Conde Santos Borba , Rodrigo Santos Costa , Felipe Husadel Poyer , Ricardo Rüther , Enio Bueno Pereira
{"title":"Renewable electricity supply in Amazonas: Energy modeling to decarbonize isolated systems","authors":"Meiriele Alvarenga Cumplido , André Rodrigues Gonçalves , Fernando Ramos Martins , Paula Conde Santos Borba , Rodrigo Santos Costa , Felipe Husadel Poyer , Ricardo Rüther , Enio Bueno Pereira","doi":"10.1016/j.seja.2026.100130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study evaluates hybrid systems using local renewable energy resources to decarbonize isolated systems (SISOL) in the Brazilian Amazon. Using the Calliope energy optimization framework, a model for SISOL was built and applied to two case studies: Careiro da Várzea and Rio Preto da Eva. The systems were analyzed under scenarios combining solar photovoltaic (PV), batteries (Bt), and green hydrogen (H<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>), considering two land-use settings for PV deployment: no spatial restrictions (default) and the minimum required area to meet local electricity demand. The installed PV and storage capacities correspond to the cost-optimal solutions obtained through optimization. In Rio Preto da Eva, the PV–Bt scenario under the default condition reduces the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) by 13% compared to the optimized fossil fuel (FF) baseline, and is characterized by 65 MW of PV capacity and 330 MWh of Bt storage. The PV–greenH<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>–Bt scenario increases the LCOE by 67%, with 117 MW of PV, 715 MWh of H<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> storage, and 2.2 MWh of batteries. Under the strictest land-use constraint, which differs between scenarios due to their distinct conversion and storage needs, the LCOE of the PV–Bt scenario exceeds that of the PV–greenH<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>–Bt scenario. In this setting, the PV–Bt system deploys 53 MW of PV and 1.4 GWh of Bt storage, while the PV–greenH<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>–Bt configuration relies on 94 MW of PV, 3.2 GWh of H<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> storage, and 36.6 MWh of batteries. Compared to FF, GHG emissions decreased by 92% in the PV–Bt scenario and by 85% in the PV–greenH<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span>–Bt pathway. In contrast, Careiro da Várzea faces significant land constraints, making scenarios spatially infeasible under the evaluated conditions. These findings highlight the critical role of local context in designing possible strategies to deeply decarbonize isolated systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101174,"journal":{"name":"Solar Energy Advances","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Solar Energy Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667113126000033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study evaluates hybrid systems using local renewable energy resources to decarbonize isolated systems (SISOL) in the Brazilian Amazon. Using the Calliope energy optimization framework, a model for SISOL was built and applied to two case studies: Careiro da Várzea and Rio Preto da Eva. The systems were analyzed under scenarios combining solar photovoltaic (PV), batteries (Bt), and green hydrogen (H), considering two land-use settings for PV deployment: no spatial restrictions (default) and the minimum required area to meet local electricity demand. The installed PV and storage capacities correspond to the cost-optimal solutions obtained through optimization. In Rio Preto da Eva, the PV–Bt scenario under the default condition reduces the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) by 13% compared to the optimized fossil fuel (FF) baseline, and is characterized by 65 MW of PV capacity and 330 MWh of Bt storage. The PV–greenH–Bt scenario increases the LCOE by 67%, with 117 MW of PV, 715 MWh of H storage, and 2.2 MWh of batteries. Under the strictest land-use constraint, which differs between scenarios due to their distinct conversion and storage needs, the LCOE of the PV–Bt scenario exceeds that of the PV–greenH–Bt scenario. In this setting, the PV–Bt system deploys 53 MW of PV and 1.4 GWh of Bt storage, while the PV–greenH–Bt configuration relies on 94 MW of PV, 3.2 GWh of H storage, and 36.6 MWh of batteries. Compared to FF, GHG emissions decreased by 92% in the PV–Bt scenario and by 85% in the PV–greenH–Bt pathway. In contrast, Careiro da Várzea faces significant land constraints, making scenarios spatially infeasible under the evaluated conditions. These findings highlight the critical role of local context in designing possible strategies to deeply decarbonize isolated systems.
本研究评估了巴西亚马逊地区利用当地可再生能源对孤立系统(SISOL)进行脱碳的混合系统。利用Calliope能源优化框架,建立了一个SISOL模型,并将其应用于两个案例研究:Careiro da Várzea和里约热内卢Preto da Eva。该系统在太阳能光伏(PV)、电池(Bt)和绿色氢(H2)结合的场景下进行了分析,考虑了光伏部署的两种土地利用设置:无空间限制(默认)和满足当地电力需求所需的最小面积。安装的光伏和存储容量对应于通过优化得到的成本最优解。在2010年Preto da Eva,与优化的化石燃料(FF)基线相比,默认条件下的光伏- Bt方案将电力成本(LCOE)降低了13%,其特点是光伏容量为65兆瓦,Bt存储容量为330兆瓦时。PV - greenh2 - bt方案将LCOE提高67%,其中光伏容量为117兆瓦,H2存储容量为715兆瓦,电池容量为2.2兆瓦。在最严格的土地利用约束下,PV-Bt情景的LCOE高于PV-greenH2-Bt情景。在这种情况下,PV - Bt系统部署了53兆瓦的光伏和1.4吉瓦时的Bt存储,而PV - greenh2 - Bt配置依赖于94兆瓦的光伏,3.2吉瓦时的H2存储和36.6兆瓦时的电池。与FF相比,PV-Bt方案的温室气体排放量减少了92%,PV-greenH2-Bt途径的温室气体排放量减少了85%。相比之下,Careiro da Várzea面临严重的土地限制,使得在评估条件下的场景在空间上不可行。这些发现强调了当地环境在设计可能的策略以深度脱碳孤立系统中的关键作用。