The WHO Guidance on Clinical Ethics: Some concerns from the Indian context.

Indian journal of medical ethics Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-10 DOI:10.20529/IJME.2025.093
Vijayaprasad Gopichandran
{"title":"The WHO Guidance on Clinical Ethics: Some concerns from the Indian context.","authors":"Vijayaprasad Gopichandran","doi":"10.20529/IJME.2025.093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The World Health Organization (WHO) released a draft guidance on clinical ethics in May 2025. This document covers education and capacity building in clinical ethics, the setting up of clinical ethics services in institutions, and the development of policies to implement clinical ethics review at institutional, national and international levels. The guidance is promising, but there are important contextual issues in India, raising concerns about its adoption and effective implementation. From the experience with research ethics committees, we know that despite more than a decade of mandating ethics committee review of medical research, we still face a number of challenges. The same practical issues will likely plague the operations of clinical ethics committees. We need to learn from and adapt learnings from these experiences. Clinical ethics rounds could offer an important model to be considered in the hospital setting. However, a large part of primary healthcare is delivered in the community. Clinical ethics considerations also arise at the intersection of a pluralistic medical practice milieu in India, and in diagnostic laboratory and imaging services and allied healthcare services like physiotherapy and occupational therapy. Clinical ethics review must include all of these. Patient advocacy groups, and civil society organisations act as watchdogs against medical malpractice and are important stakeholders in the clinical ethics review process. Media reports also play a crucial role. The role of these stakeholders must be given due importance in the guidance for it to realise its full potential to initiate discourse and strengthen clinical practice regulation in India.</p>","PeriodicalId":517372,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of medical ethics","volume":" ","pages":"203-207"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of medical ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20529/IJME.2025.093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) released a draft guidance on clinical ethics in May 2025. This document covers education and capacity building in clinical ethics, the setting up of clinical ethics services in institutions, and the development of policies to implement clinical ethics review at institutional, national and international levels. The guidance is promising, but there are important contextual issues in India, raising concerns about its adoption and effective implementation. From the experience with research ethics committees, we know that despite more than a decade of mandating ethics committee review of medical research, we still face a number of challenges. The same practical issues will likely plague the operations of clinical ethics committees. We need to learn from and adapt learnings from these experiences. Clinical ethics rounds could offer an important model to be considered in the hospital setting. However, a large part of primary healthcare is delivered in the community. Clinical ethics considerations also arise at the intersection of a pluralistic medical practice milieu in India, and in diagnostic laboratory and imaging services and allied healthcare services like physiotherapy and occupational therapy. Clinical ethics review must include all of these. Patient advocacy groups, and civil society organisations act as watchdogs against medical malpractice and are important stakeholders in the clinical ethics review process. Media reports also play a crucial role. The role of these stakeholders must be given due importance in the guidance for it to realise its full potential to initiate discourse and strengthen clinical practice regulation in India.

世卫组织临床伦理学指南:来自印度背景的一些关注。
世界卫生组织(世卫组织)于2025年5月发布了一份临床伦理指导草案。该文件涵盖临床伦理教育和能力建设,在机构中建立临床伦理服务,以及制定在机构、国家和国际层面实施临床伦理审查的政策。该指导方针是有希望的,但在印度存在重要的背景问题,引起人们对其采用和有效实施的担忧。从研究伦理委员会的经验来看,我们知道,尽管十多年来要求伦理委员会对医学研究进行审查,但我们仍然面临许多挑战。同样的实际问题可能会困扰临床伦理委员会的运作。我们需要从这些经验中学习和适应。临床伦理查房可以提供一个重要的模式,以考虑在医院设置。然而,初级保健的很大一部分是在社区提供的。在印度多元化的医疗实践环境中,在诊断实验室和成像服务以及物理治疗和职业治疗等联合医疗保健服务中,也出现了临床伦理方面的考虑。临床伦理审查必须包括所有这些。患者权益团体和民间社会组织作为医疗事故的监督者,在临床伦理审查过程中是重要的利益相关者。媒体报道也起着至关重要的作用。这些利益相关者的作用必须在指导中给予应有的重视,以实现其在印度启动讨论和加强临床实践监管的全部潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书