One-day appendectomy: more an opportunity than a challenge. A prospective protocol.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Davina Perini, Jacopo Martellucci, Maximilian Scheiterle, Francesca Cammelli, Annamaria DI Bella, Salvatore DE Masi, Alessandro Bruscino, Paolo Prosperi
{"title":"One-day appendectomy: more an opportunity than a challenge. A prospective protocol.","authors":"Davina Perini, Jacopo Martellucci, Maximilian Scheiterle, Francesca Cammelli, Annamaria DI Bella, Salvatore DE Masi, Alessandro Bruscino, Paolo Prosperi","doi":"10.23736/S2724-5691.25.11021-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Short-stay and ambulatory pathways for laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) have gained increasing acceptance, yet conventional hospitalization remains common practice for acute appendicitis (AA). This study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of a structured one-day LA protocol (discharge within 24 hours) and to refine patient selection criteria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A two-phase observational study was conducted, including a retrospective analysis followed by prospective validation of predefined eligibility criteria for one-day discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 812 LA patients, early discharge was achieved safely without increased complications or readmissions. In the prospective phase, 132 patients met criteria and 90 were discharged within 24 hours. Logistic regression confirmed operator-dependent factors - especially drainage and longer operative time - as primary barriers to protocol adherence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A structured one-day LA protocol is safe, feasible, and effective in selected patients. The one-day pathway is now standard of care for uncomplicated AA at our institution.</p>","PeriodicalId":29847,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Surgery","volume":"81 1","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5691.25.11021-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Short-stay and ambulatory pathways for laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) have gained increasing acceptance, yet conventional hospitalization remains common practice for acute appendicitis (AA). This study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of a structured one-day LA protocol (discharge within 24 hours) and to refine patient selection criteria.

Methods: A two-phase observational study was conducted, including a retrospective analysis followed by prospective validation of predefined eligibility criteria for one-day discharge.

Results: Among 812 LA patients, early discharge was achieved safely without increased complications or readmissions. In the prospective phase, 132 patients met criteria and 90 were discharged within 24 hours. Logistic regression confirmed operator-dependent factors - especially drainage and longer operative time - as primary barriers to protocol adherence.

Conclusions: A structured one-day LA protocol is safe, feasible, and effective in selected patients. The one-day pathway is now standard of care for uncomplicated AA at our institution.

一天阑尾切除术:与其说是挑战,不如说是机遇。前瞻性协议。
背景:腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)的短期住院和门诊路径已经越来越被接受,然而传统的住院治疗仍然是急性阑尾炎(AA)的常见做法。本研究旨在评估结构化一天LA方案(24小时内出院)的安全性和可行性,并完善患者选择标准。方法:进行了一项两期观察性研究,包括回顾性分析,然后对预定的一天出院资格标准进行前瞻性验证。结果:在812例LA患者中,早期出院安全,无并发症增加或再入院。在前瞻性阶段,132名患者符合标准,90名患者在24小时内出院。Logistic回归证实了操作者相关因素——尤其是引流和较长的手术时间——是协议遵守的主要障碍。结论:结构化的1天LA方案在选定的患者中是安全、可行和有效的。一天的途径现在是我们机构简单的AA的标准护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerva Surgery
Minerva Surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
320
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书