Association Between Social Vulnerability and Postoperative Complications and Readmission Among Cardiovascular Surgery Patients.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Ria Tilve, Guangjin Zhou, Jean-Luc A Maigrot, Siran M Koroukian, Edward G Soltesz, Wyatt P Bensken
{"title":"Association Between Social Vulnerability and Postoperative Complications and Readmission Among Cardiovascular Surgery Patients.","authors":"Ria Tilve, Guangjin Zhou, Jean-Luc A Maigrot, Siran M Koroukian, Edward G Soltesz, Wyatt P Bensken","doi":"10.1177/19427891261428802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the well-established importance of health-related social needs in shaping patient outcomes, gaps remain in the literature examining these relationships at the individual level among patients undergoing cardiac surgery. This retrospective study used data from the 2016-2018 Nationwide Readmission Database to evaluate postoperative complications and readmissions in patients undergoing cardiac surgery (coronary artery bypass grafting, aortic surgery, valve surgery, or a combination) using individual-level social vulnerability clinically acknowledged using ICD-10 Z-codes. Six domains of ICD-10 Z-codes (employment, family, housing, psychosocial needs, socioeconomic status, dependence) were considered social vulnerabilities. Data were analyzed using stratification by social vulnerability status and multivariable logistic regression. Among the 846,837 included patients, dependence-related needs were the most documented domain. Patients with social vulnerability at any point were younger, had a longer length of stay, and had a higher prevalence of comorbid conditions, readmissions, and complications. For patients with social vulnerability, the odds ratio of complications was 1.12 (1.03-1.22), and the odds ratio of 90-day readmissions was 1.15 (1.03-1.27). Clinically acknowledged social vulnerability at any point was associated with higher odds of complications or readmissions after cardiac surgery. Z-codes may be useful for identifying nonmedical factors that can affect patient outcomes, but further standardization and assessment are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":20396,"journal":{"name":"Population Health Management","volume":" ","pages":"19427891261428802"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population Health Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19427891261428802","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the well-established importance of health-related social needs in shaping patient outcomes, gaps remain in the literature examining these relationships at the individual level among patients undergoing cardiac surgery. This retrospective study used data from the 2016-2018 Nationwide Readmission Database to evaluate postoperative complications and readmissions in patients undergoing cardiac surgery (coronary artery bypass grafting, aortic surgery, valve surgery, or a combination) using individual-level social vulnerability clinically acknowledged using ICD-10 Z-codes. Six domains of ICD-10 Z-codes (employment, family, housing, psychosocial needs, socioeconomic status, dependence) were considered social vulnerabilities. Data were analyzed using stratification by social vulnerability status and multivariable logistic regression. Among the 846,837 included patients, dependence-related needs were the most documented domain. Patients with social vulnerability at any point were younger, had a longer length of stay, and had a higher prevalence of comorbid conditions, readmissions, and complications. For patients with social vulnerability, the odds ratio of complications was 1.12 (1.03-1.22), and the odds ratio of 90-day readmissions was 1.15 (1.03-1.27). Clinically acknowledged social vulnerability at any point was associated with higher odds of complications or readmissions after cardiac surgery. Z-codes may be useful for identifying nonmedical factors that can affect patient outcomes, but further standardization and assessment are needed.

社会脆弱性与心血管手术患者术后并发症和再入院的关系
尽管与健康相关的社会需求在塑造患者预后方面具有公认的重要性,但在接受心脏手术患者的个体水平上研究这些关系的文献中仍然存在空白。本回顾性研究使用2016-2018年全国再入院数据库的数据,评估心脏手术(冠状动脉搭桥术、主动脉手术、瓣膜手术或联合手术)患者的术后并发症和再入院情况,使用ICD-10 z码临床承认的个人层面的社会脆弱性。ICD-10 z代码的六个领域(就业、家庭、住房、社会心理需求、社会经济地位、依赖)被认为是社会脆弱性。采用社会脆弱性分层和多变量logistic回归对数据进行分析。在846,837名纳入的患者中,与依赖相关的需求是记录最多的领域。在任何时候具有社会脆弱性的患者都更年轻,住院时间更长,合并症、再入院和并发症的发生率更高。社会弱势患者并发症的优势比为1.12(1.03-1.22),90天再入院的优势比为1.15(1.03-1.27)。临床承认的社会脆弱性在任何时候都与心脏手术后并发症或再入院的几率较高有关。z码可能有助于识别可能影响患者预后的非医学因素,但需要进一步的标准化和评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Population Health Management
Population Health Management 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Population Health Management provides comprehensive, authoritative strategies for improving the systems and policies that affect health care quality, access, and outcomes, ultimately improving the health of an entire population. The Journal delivers essential research on a broad range of topics including the impact of social, cultural, economic, and environmental factors on health care systems and practices. Population Health Management coverage includes: Clinical case reports and studies on managing major public health conditions Compliance programs Health economics Outcomes assessment Provider incentives Health care reform Resource management Return on investment (ROI) Health care quality Care coordination.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书