Exploratory clinical trial on the acoustic variability index for predicting fluid responsiveness during hepatectomy.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Woo-Young Seo, Hye-Mee Kwon, Baehun Moon, Hyun-Seok Kim, Kyu-Min Kang, Chang-Hoe Heo, Gil-Chun Park, Ji-Jung Park, Sung-Hoon Kim, In-Gu Jun, Jun-Gol Song, Gyu-Sam Hwang
{"title":"Exploratory clinical trial on the acoustic variability index for predicting fluid responsiveness during hepatectomy.","authors":"Woo-Young Seo, Hye-Mee Kwon, Baehun Moon, Hyun-Seok Kim, Kyu-Min Kang, Chang-Hoe Heo, Gil-Chun Park, Ji-Jung Park, Sung-Hoon Kim, In-Gu Jun, Jun-Gol Song, Gyu-Sam Hwang","doi":"10.1007/s10877-026-01427-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The acoustic variability index (AVI), derived from continuous phonocardiographic analysis of heart sounds via an esophageal stethoscope, is a novel minimally invasive method for intraoperative hemodynamic monitoring. We evaluated the ability of AVI to predict fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing hepatectomy and compared its performance with that of the conventional indices. Forty adult patients who underwent hepatectomy were enrolled in this prospective, single-center observational study. After major surgical resection and stabilization, a 500 mL crystalloid fluid challenge was administered. Hemodynamic parameters including AVI, central venous pressure (CVP), stroke volume variation (SVV), and pulse pressure variation (PPV) were recorded before and after volume expansion. Patients with ≥ 10% increase in cardiac output (CO) were defined as responders. Thirty-seven patients were included in the final analysis, of which 12 (32.4%) were classified as responders. After fluid loading, responders showed a significant decrease in AVI (11.4% ± 2.5% to 7.8% ± 2.9%, p = 0.004), while non-responders showed no significant change (7.1% ± 3.2% to 6.3% ± 3.0%, p = 0.356). AVI demonstrated predictive performance comparable to SVV and PPV, with an optimal cutoff of > 9.8% and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.873 (95% CI: 0.743–0.967). Real-time intraoperative monitoring of the AVI shows potential as a predictor for fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing hepatectomy. AVI offers a promising, minimally invasive approach for guiding fluid therapy. Further research is warranted to validate its utility in broader surgical populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":"663-671"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13194251/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-026-01427-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The acoustic variability index (AVI), derived from continuous phonocardiographic analysis of heart sounds via an esophageal stethoscope, is a novel minimally invasive method for intraoperative hemodynamic monitoring. We evaluated the ability of AVI to predict fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing hepatectomy and compared its performance with that of the conventional indices. Forty adult patients who underwent hepatectomy were enrolled in this prospective, single-center observational study. After major surgical resection and stabilization, a 500 mL crystalloid fluid challenge was administered. Hemodynamic parameters including AVI, central venous pressure (CVP), stroke volume variation (SVV), and pulse pressure variation (PPV) were recorded before and after volume expansion. Patients with ≥ 10% increase in cardiac output (CO) were defined as responders. Thirty-seven patients were included in the final analysis, of which 12 (32.4%) were classified as responders. After fluid loading, responders showed a significant decrease in AVI (11.4% ± 2.5% to 7.8% ± 2.9%, p = 0.004), while non-responders showed no significant change (7.1% ± 3.2% to 6.3% ± 3.0%, p = 0.356). AVI demonstrated predictive performance comparable to SVV and PPV, with an optimal cutoff of > 9.8% and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.873 (95% CI: 0.743–0.967). Real-time intraoperative monitoring of the AVI shows potential as a predictor for fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing hepatectomy. AVI offers a promising, minimally invasive approach for guiding fluid therapy. Further research is warranted to validate its utility in broader surgical populations.

预测肝切除术中液体反应性的声学变异性指数的探索性临床试验。
声学变异性指数(AVI)是一种新的微创术中血流动力学监测方法,通过食道听诊器对心音进行连续的心音分析。我们评估了AVI预测肝切除术患者液体反应性的能力,并将其与常规指标进行了比较。40名接受肝切除术的成年患者被纳入这项前瞻性、单中心观察性研究。在主要手术切除和稳定后,给予500ml晶体液体刺激。记录扩容前后的AVI、中心静脉压(CVP)、卒中容积变化(SVV)、脉压变化(PPV)等血流动力学参数。心输出量(CO)增加≥10%的患者被定义为有应答者。37例患者纳入最终分析,其中12例(32.4%)为应答者。加载液体后,应答者的AVI显著降低(11.4%±2.5%至7.8%±2.9%,p = 0.004),而无应答者的AVI无显著变化(7.1%±3.2%至6.3%±3.0%,p = 0.356)。AVI的预测性能与SVV和PPV相当,最佳截止值为bb0 9.8%,受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.873 (95% CI: 0.743-0.967)。术中实时监测AVI显示有可能预测肝切除术患者的液体反应性。AVI为引导液体治疗提供了一种有前途的微创方法。需要进一步的研究来验证其在更广泛的外科人群中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.60%
发文量
144
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing is a clinical journal publishing papers related to technology in the fields of anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, and peri-operative medicine. The journal has links with numerous specialist societies, including editorial board representatives from the European Society for Computing and Technology in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (ESCTAIC), the Society for Technology in Anesthesia (STA), the Society for Complex Acute Illness (SCAI) and the NAVAt (NAVigating towards your Anaestheisa Targets) group. The journal publishes original papers, narrative and systematic reviews, technological notes, letters to the editor, editorial or commentary papers, and policy statements or guidelines from national or international societies. The journal encourages debate on published papers and technology, including letters commenting on previous publications or technological concerns. The journal occasionally publishes special issues with technological or clinical themes, or reports and abstracts from scientificmeetings. Special issues proposals should be sent to the Editor-in-Chief. Specific details of types of papers, and the clinical and technological content of papers considered within scope can be found in instructions for authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书