Woo-Young Seo, Hye-Mee Kwon, Baehun Moon, Hyun-Seok Kim, Kyu-Min Kang, Chang-Hoe Heo, Gil-Chun Park, Ji-Jung Park, Sung-Hoon Kim, In-Gu Jun, Jun-Gol Song, Gyu-Sam Hwang
{"title":"Exploratory clinical trial on the acoustic variability index for predicting fluid responsiveness during hepatectomy.","authors":"Woo-Young Seo, Hye-Mee Kwon, Baehun Moon, Hyun-Seok Kim, Kyu-Min Kang, Chang-Hoe Heo, Gil-Chun Park, Ji-Jung Park, Sung-Hoon Kim, In-Gu Jun, Jun-Gol Song, Gyu-Sam Hwang","doi":"10.1007/s10877-026-01427-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The acoustic variability index (AVI), derived from continuous phonocardiographic analysis of heart sounds via an esophageal stethoscope, is a novel minimally invasive method for intraoperative hemodynamic monitoring. We evaluated the ability of AVI to predict fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing hepatectomy and compared its performance with that of the conventional indices. Forty adult patients who underwent hepatectomy were enrolled in this prospective, single-center observational study. After major surgical resection and stabilization, a 500 mL crystalloid fluid challenge was administered. Hemodynamic parameters including AVI, central venous pressure (CVP), stroke volume variation (SVV), and pulse pressure variation (PPV) were recorded before and after volume expansion. Patients with ≥ 10% increase in cardiac output (CO) were defined as responders. Thirty-seven patients were included in the final analysis, of which 12 (32.4%) were classified as responders. After fluid loading, responders showed a significant decrease in AVI (11.4% ± 2.5% to 7.8% ± 2.9%, p = 0.004), while non-responders showed no significant change (7.1% ± 3.2% to 6.3% ± 3.0%, p = 0.356). AVI demonstrated predictive performance comparable to SVV and PPV, with an optimal cutoff of > 9.8% and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.873 (95% CI: 0.743–0.967). Real-time intraoperative monitoring of the AVI shows potential as a predictor for fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing hepatectomy. AVI offers a promising, minimally invasive approach for guiding fluid therapy. Further research is warranted to validate its utility in broader surgical populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":"663-671"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13194251/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-026-01427-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The acoustic variability index (AVI), derived from continuous phonocardiographic analysis of heart sounds via an esophageal stethoscope, is a novel minimally invasive method for intraoperative hemodynamic monitoring. We evaluated the ability of AVI to predict fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing hepatectomy and compared its performance with that of the conventional indices. Forty adult patients who underwent hepatectomy were enrolled in this prospective, single-center observational study. After major surgical resection and stabilization, a 500 mL crystalloid fluid challenge was administered. Hemodynamic parameters including AVI, central venous pressure (CVP), stroke volume variation (SVV), and pulse pressure variation (PPV) were recorded before and after volume expansion. Patients with ≥ 10% increase in cardiac output (CO) were defined as responders. Thirty-seven patients were included in the final analysis, of which 12 (32.4%) were classified as responders. After fluid loading, responders showed a significant decrease in AVI (11.4% ± 2.5% to 7.8% ± 2.9%, p = 0.004), while non-responders showed no significant change (7.1% ± 3.2% to 6.3% ± 3.0%, p = 0.356). AVI demonstrated predictive performance comparable to SVV and PPV, with an optimal cutoff of > 9.8% and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.873 (95% CI: 0.743–0.967). Real-time intraoperative monitoring of the AVI shows potential as a predictor for fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing hepatectomy. AVI offers a promising, minimally invasive approach for guiding fluid therapy. Further research is warranted to validate its utility in broader surgical populations.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing is a clinical journal publishing papers related to technology in the fields of anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, and peri-operative medicine.
The journal has links with numerous specialist societies, including editorial board representatives from the European Society for Computing and Technology in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (ESCTAIC), the Society for Technology in Anesthesia (STA), the Society for Complex Acute Illness (SCAI) and the NAVAt (NAVigating towards your Anaestheisa Targets) group.
The journal publishes original papers, narrative and systematic reviews, technological notes, letters to the editor, editorial or commentary papers, and policy statements or guidelines from national or international societies. The journal encourages debate on published papers and technology, including letters commenting on previous publications or technological concerns. The journal occasionally publishes special issues with technological or clinical themes, or reports and abstracts from scientificmeetings. Special issues proposals should be sent to the Editor-in-Chief. Specific details of types of papers, and the clinical and technological content of papers considered within scope can be found in instructions for authors.