{"title":"Trends in Selection Into Medicare Advantage.","authors":"Anuj Gangopadhyaya, Bowen Garrett","doi":"10.1002/hec.70091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Medicare Advantage (MA) enrollment more than doubled from 2013 to 2023, raising concerns about risk selection, spending, and the continued use of traditional Medicare (TM) spending as a benchmark for MA payment. This study examines trends in selection into MA from 2009 to 2020 using administrative and survey data from the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey. For each survey year, we estimate a regression model of Part A and B spending among TM enrollees based on demographic characteristics, self-reported health status, limitations in activities of daily living, and enrollee group type (e.g., dual eligible, institutionalized, disabled). We apply this model to MA enrollees to estimate their predicted TM spending. We find that since 2017, MA enrollees have had higher predicted costs than TM enrollees-5-6% higher from 2017 to 2020-driven largely by the growing share of dual eligibles in MA. Within enrollee group type, however, we observe little evidence of differential selection. We further use the model results from just our baseline year, 2009, to predict both MA and TM spending in each subsequent year. We find that although MA enrollee characteristics did not trend observably healthier or sicker over this period, TM enrollees' characteristics appear to have shifted in ways associated with lower predicted spending over time. These findings suggest that the nature of selection into MA has qualitatively shifted over recent years and raises further questions about how well the current risk adjustment system reflects appropriate differences in risk as the enrollee characteristics in these groups continue to diverge.</p>","PeriodicalId":12847,"journal":{"name":"Health economics","volume":" ","pages":"978-994"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.70091","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Medicare Advantage (MA) enrollment more than doubled from 2013 to 2023, raising concerns about risk selection, spending, and the continued use of traditional Medicare (TM) spending as a benchmark for MA payment. This study examines trends in selection into MA from 2009 to 2020 using administrative and survey data from the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey. For each survey year, we estimate a regression model of Part A and B spending among TM enrollees based on demographic characteristics, self-reported health status, limitations in activities of daily living, and enrollee group type (e.g., dual eligible, institutionalized, disabled). We apply this model to MA enrollees to estimate their predicted TM spending. We find that since 2017, MA enrollees have had higher predicted costs than TM enrollees-5-6% higher from 2017 to 2020-driven largely by the growing share of dual eligibles in MA. Within enrollee group type, however, we observe little evidence of differential selection. We further use the model results from just our baseline year, 2009, to predict both MA and TM spending in each subsequent year. We find that although MA enrollee characteristics did not trend observably healthier or sicker over this period, TM enrollees' characteristics appear to have shifted in ways associated with lower predicted spending over time. These findings suggest that the nature of selection into MA has qualitatively shifted over recent years and raises further questions about how well the current risk adjustment system reflects appropriate differences in risk as the enrollee characteristics in these groups continue to diverge.
期刊介绍:
This Journal publishes articles on all aspects of health economics: theoretical contributions, empirical studies and analyses of health policy from the economic perspective. Its scope includes the determinants of health and its definition and valuation, as well as the demand for and supply of health care; planning and market mechanisms; micro-economic evaluation of individual procedures and treatments; and evaluation of the performance of health care systems.
Contributions should typically be original and innovative. As a rule, the Journal does not include routine applications of cost-effectiveness analysis, discrete choice experiments and costing analyses.
Editorials are regular features, these should be concise and topical. Occasionally commissioned reviews are published and special issues bring together contributions on a single topic. Health Economics Letters facilitate rapid exchange of views on topical issues. Contributions related to problems in both developed and developing countries are welcome.