{"title":"Illusion of choice? Implicit coercion and assisted dying in clinical practice.","authors":"Ruslan Zinchenko, Sheila Hollins","doi":"10.1136/spcare-2026-006164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this article, we argue that the narrow focus on explicit coercion in assisted dying obscures more pervasive forms of implicit coercion operating at interpersonal and institutional levels. Drawing on complex adaptive systems theory, we conceptualise healthcare systems as environments in which coercive dynamics emerge non-linearly and cannot be adequately mitigated through linear procedural safeguards.We look at the potential for implicit coercion within the unique context of terminal illness and consider how end-of-life emotional distress and attachment style shape individuals' responses to vulnerability, dependency and care, influencing how choices are expressed. We also examine the erosion of personal identity in terminal illness, arguing that beyond decision-making capacity and voluntariness, the authenticity of decision-making should be an important consideration in requests for assisted dying.We then turn to structural and institutional coercion, focusing on the influence of social roles, norms and professional authority. We examine how structural constraints and choice architecture affect freedom of choice. The Mental Health Act in England and Wales is used as a case study to illustrate how institutional coercion can emerge in practice despite the presence of statutory safeguards.Finally, we argue that assisted dying legal frameworks fail to adequately address implicit coercion and offer mitigation strategies to reduce the risk of it arising in complex healthcare systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":9136,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":"1102-1108"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2026-006164","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this article, we argue that the narrow focus on explicit coercion in assisted dying obscures more pervasive forms of implicit coercion operating at interpersonal and institutional levels. Drawing on complex adaptive systems theory, we conceptualise healthcare systems as environments in which coercive dynamics emerge non-linearly and cannot be adequately mitigated through linear procedural safeguards.We look at the potential for implicit coercion within the unique context of terminal illness and consider how end-of-life emotional distress and attachment style shape individuals' responses to vulnerability, dependency and care, influencing how choices are expressed. We also examine the erosion of personal identity in terminal illness, arguing that beyond decision-making capacity and voluntariness, the authenticity of decision-making should be an important consideration in requests for assisted dying.We then turn to structural and institutional coercion, focusing on the influence of social roles, norms and professional authority. We examine how structural constraints and choice architecture affect freedom of choice. The Mental Health Act in England and Wales is used as a case study to illustrate how institutional coercion can emerge in practice despite the presence of statutory safeguards.Finally, we argue that assisted dying legal frameworks fail to adequately address implicit coercion and offer mitigation strategies to reduce the risk of it arising in complex healthcare systems.
期刊介绍:
Published quarterly in print and continuously online, BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care aims to connect many disciplines and specialties throughout the world by providing high quality, clinically relevant research, reviews, comment, information and news of international importance.
We hold an inclusive view of supportive and palliative care research and we are able to call on expertise to critique the whole range of methodologies within the subject, including those working in transitional research, clinical trials, epidemiology, behavioural sciences, ethics and health service research. Articles with relevance to clinical practice and clinical service development will be considered for publication.
In an international context, many different categories of clinician and healthcare workers do clinical work associated with palliative medicine, specialist or generalist palliative care, supportive care, psychosocial-oncology and end of life care. We wish to engage many specialties, not only those traditionally associated with supportive and palliative care. We hope to extend the readership to doctors, nurses, other healthcare workers and researchers in medical and surgical specialties, including but not limited to cardiology, gastroenterology, geriatrics, neurology, oncology, paediatrics, primary care, psychiatry, psychology, renal medicine, respiratory medicine.