Investigating optimal warming techniques for hypothermia in a swine model of ischemia

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
American journal of surgery Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-03 DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2026.116912
Hannah Palmerton , Brooklyn Williams , Grace Pak , Bobby Zhang , Beau Prey , Andrew Francis , James Williams , Luke Pumiglia , Erik Roedel , Mike Lallemand , John McClellan , Nicholas Ieronimakis , Jason Bingham
{"title":"Investigating optimal warming techniques for hypothermia in a swine model of ischemia","authors":"Hannah Palmerton ,&nbsp;Brooklyn Williams ,&nbsp;Grace Pak ,&nbsp;Bobby Zhang ,&nbsp;Beau Prey ,&nbsp;Andrew Francis ,&nbsp;James Williams ,&nbsp;Luke Pumiglia ,&nbsp;Erik Roedel ,&nbsp;Mike Lallemand ,&nbsp;John McClellan ,&nbsp;Nicholas Ieronimakis ,&nbsp;Jason Bingham","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2026.116912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>With trauma, hypothermia is associated with increased bleeding and worse outcomes yet the pace of rewarming is unproven and its influence unclear. We hypothesized that the rate of rewarming influences outcomes and evaluated its impact in a porcine model of trauma.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Pigs underwent controlled hemorrhage and hypothermia to 32 °C for 1 h, followed by rapid or slow rewarming for 3 h. Hemodynamics and coagulation were compared along with liver gene expression.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The mean temperature reached between fast (37.9±0.13 °C) and slow groups (34.5±1.2 °C) was significantly different (p &lt; 0.01). The slow group had a lower heart rate and the mean arterial pressure (MAP) was lower with both slow and fast. No major differences in lactate, pH, coagulation or gene expression were observed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our study supports rapid rewarming for reversing hypothermia post hemorrhage. Further research is needed to evaluate long-term outcomes within clinical settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"256 ","pages":"Article 116912"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002961026000954","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

With trauma, hypothermia is associated with increased bleeding and worse outcomes yet the pace of rewarming is unproven and its influence unclear. We hypothesized that the rate of rewarming influences outcomes and evaluated its impact in a porcine model of trauma.

Methods

Pigs underwent controlled hemorrhage and hypothermia to 32 °C for 1 h, followed by rapid or slow rewarming for 3 h. Hemodynamics and coagulation were compared along with liver gene expression.

Results

The mean temperature reached between fast (37.9±0.13 °C) and slow groups (34.5±1.2 °C) was significantly different (p < 0.01). The slow group had a lower heart rate and the mean arterial pressure (MAP) was lower with both slow and fast. No major differences in lactate, pH, coagulation or gene expression were observed.

Conclusion

Our study supports rapid rewarming for reversing hypothermia post hemorrhage. Further research is needed to evaluate long-term outcomes within clinical settings.
研究猪缺血模型中低温的最佳加热技术
对于创伤,低体温与出血增加和更糟糕的结果相关,但复温的速度尚未得到证实,其影响也不清楚。我们假设复温率会影响结果,并在猪创伤模型中评估其影响。方法对大鼠进行控制出血和32°C低温1 h,然后快速或缓慢复温3 h,比较血流动力学和凝血以及肝脏基因表达。结果快速组(37.9±0.13°C)与慢速组(34.5±1.2°C)的平均温度差异有统计学意义(p < 0.01)。慢速组心率较低,平均动脉压(MAP)在慢速组和快速组均较低。乳酸、pH、凝血或基因表达均无显著差异。结论:本研究支持出血后快速复温逆转体温过低。需要进一步的研究来评估临床环境中的长期结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
570
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Surgery® is a peer-reviewed journal designed for the general surgeon who performs abdominal, cancer, vascular, head and neck, breast, colorectal, and other forms of surgery. AJS is the official journal of 7 major surgical societies* and publishes their official papers as well as independently submitted clinical studies, editorials, reviews, brief reports, correspondence and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书